this is a sequel to the Gizmotron user-mod for Axis and Allies. there will be new types of weather, more territory maps in skirmish mod, (larger maps in skirmish mode as well). new experience ranks and bonuses (regiments keep getting bonuses up to 2000 exp points). nearly 100 special ops, new water-based units like cruisers and submarines (with torpedo attacks). nations to be included are Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Communist China, Croatia, Czechoslovakia, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Japan, Nationalist China, Netherlands, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden, and the United States. more nations available for WW2 mode, see images for details. tentative Alpha-test release date is March 2014, the final version will hopefully be done by November 2014

Image RSS Feed Latest Screens
Division Azul HQ & Infantry CO portrait Division Azul packable & unpackable artillery bunkers
Blog RSS Feed Report abuse Latest News: Eras of War

2 comments by Gizmotron on Aug 18th, 2014

eras have been done before-- like in Stukoke's excellent World at War Mod.
 the big problem was where to put everything and how to organize it.  if we were serious about dividing things into era there could be as many as three or four times as many division tents as what we already had!  some techs weren't even available early in the war.  so we had to think about making multiple copies of each faction... even tech buildings.
 the Corps HQ special op presents another complication.  which Corps would you use?  the op will only summon one actor every time.  in Stukoke's mod he had the default special op Corps HQ limited to JUST early war tech.  I understand why this was done-- because it penalizes players for losing.  but it doesn't really make sense to be playing in the year 1944 in an RMC map and then have to revert to 1938 units because you lost your Corps.  this becomes a major disaster in SP campaign games.
 
another problem is the WW2 Metagame.  Stukoke had players spend extra money on late-war armies.  this still didn't stop players from buying late war armies as early as 1941.  I figured the only way to discourage this was to use stacking tech limitations.  one year had to be researched before players could advance to the next year.  if advancing one year in tech cost $200 players would have to think hard about whether they wanted those late war units at the risk of having fewer armies.  one late-war army could defeat numerous early war armies.
 the challenge was how do we add multiple time periods but have it work in both SP campaigns AND in WW2 mode?
 the idea I came up with was a "Universal Corps HQ".
 the Universal Corps HQ that would recruit era-based Corps HQ trucks.  this building would have a year-based techs. players would start with 1938 techs and then have to invest each year in chronological order.  it would use the same layout as heavy tanks being required before super-heavy tanks.  you couldn't use 1943 units without first researching previous years.
 the advantage is that we could leave the tech buildings largely unchanged. we could limit the units available through era-based division tents recruited from era-based Corps HQs.  it would be confusing enough to have era-based division tents let alone era-based tech buildings.
 it would also require minimal changes to the Metagame.  we wouldn't need to add dozens of new period-based armies with different price tags.  players could simply purchase the normal armies and know that they were already limited by yearly tech.  it also prevents late-war units from being used in the Metagame too far ahead of schedule.
 the Universal Corps would become the default special op building.  players could summon a new Corps but wouldn't be forced to travel back in time.  they would also still be limited to the tech they had previously researched.  if they wanted to research their way into the future that would still be an option in RMCs.
 the plan was to divide each faction into roughly three eras.  (early, middle, and late)
 all that being said... we decided that we weren't going to do eras until after we finished the basic version of the mod for the whole war.  if we tried to implement it now it would probably push the project back about 6-8 months (at best).  it's not just the major nations now.  we currently have 20+ nations in this mod.  if we do eras it would have to nearly every country.

 

Post comment Comments  (0 - 10 of 496)
1skeip1
1skeip1 Sep 16 2014, 8:36am says:

I wanted to send you a file with photographs of all Italian tanks but do not know how

+1 vote     reply to comment
Gizmotron
Gizmotron Sep 17 2014, 1:03am replied:

thanks for the offer-- but I've found that with Google Translate, and some key Italian words, finding pictures isn't too hard to do.

+1 vote     reply to comment
kingofhugs
kingofhugs Sep 15 2014, 2:48pm says:

Have the dynamics for snipers changed? Could you make them operate similarly to targeted artillery? Being able to fire from afar without taking fire themselves? and be able to target individuals?

+1 vote     reply to comment
kingofhugs
kingofhugs Sep 17 2014, 5:10pm replied:

so have it set as an infantry-only bonus? And by being able to target, I meant similar to how if you place an arty barrage on a specific entity, it'll focus fire that entity. Maybe have the same function for snipers? Where when you click 'attack' and then place it on a entity, they'll focus fire that entity then switch to the overall unit once it's kill.

+1 vote     reply to comment
kingofhugs
kingofhugs 3hours 41mins ago replied:

So snipers are, for lack of a better description, becoming obsolete in this mod?

+1 vote     reply to comment
Gizmotron
Gizmotron 20hours 5mins ago replied:

yeah, but that's what mortar infantry and field guns are for.

the game allows you to target specific combat units within an enemy regiment for attack. it's not perfect-- but it's already an option.

so far as I know, after years of experimenting on the game, the kind of target prioritization you're talking about isn't allowed with the existing game mechanics. targets include aircraft, buildings, commanding officers, infantry, vehicles, tanks, and water. you can't mix and match targets-- the game simply won't allow it for anything apart from special ops with multiple components.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Gizmotron
Gizmotron Sep 17 2014, 12:48am replied:

I felt like snipers were over-powered in the original game. now that I've made MG and mortar units deadlier vs infantry it seemed reasonable to give snipers a longer 'reach'.

the problem with giving snipers a special attack bonus against commanding officers (aka 'captains') is that it makes them too powerful against division tents, armored cars, and tank CO units. you could see snipers laying waste to halftrack and armored car regiments. I saw an example where a single sniper regiment could destroy a Panzer IV CO tank in less than half the time it would take a regular heavy infantry regiment to do the same job. it doesn't really make sense in terms of game-play.

we can't add new types of targets without some really awful side-effects. so for now snipers will have to remain basically unchanged.

+1 vote     reply to comment
kingofhugs
kingofhugs Sep 13 2014, 12:02pm replied:

What about aircraft that are designed solely for strafing enemy units? I know that the Germans found a way to attached a 37mm cannon to Stukas and the HE111 for the purpose of AT and AM.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Gizmotron
Gizmotron Sep 13 2014, 1:22pm replied:

I wasn't real happy with the Bordkannon tests I did with the Stuka. I found that bombs were more effective at taking out enemy vehicles. cannons only worked on a single target-- and better results were obtained against enemy regiments with bombs.

I also tried out the Ju-88 P-1. but the lag time between an attack, circling around, and attacking again made them very ineffective. cannons can only effect one target at a time. usually after one target suffered some damage they'd run to friendly supply and start healing again before any serious damage could take place.

the Mosquito Mk.XVIII is the only cannon-armed aircraft in the game. it has a 6-pounder 57mm gun with an AP attack of 80 points. this is the same as the Tempest armed with four 20-mm cannons with 80 points of AP damage. the big difference is that the Mossie XVIII cannon has a 250-point bonus against vehicles. it just wasn't enough to really dent enemy regiments. so I added 5-inch rockets and four .303 machine guns as well. the variant Mosquito works because it has multiple forms of attack-- but the heavy cannons just didn't work out as well as I thought they would.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Gizmotron
Gizmotron Sep 11 2014, 8:29pm replied:

there's really only one aspect of aircraft that we haven't changed yet. and that would be damage resistance. I would be willing to add "Air Combat Training" for a bonus of 10% resistance to gunfire damage and 5% resistance to AP damage.

the old fighter bombers were based on the misconception that only bombers could be assigned to the bomber "attack' position. now that we have dive bomber models most of those dive bombing fighters won't exist anymore.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Icon
Axis & Allies Icon
Platform
Windows
Developed By
Gizmotron
Contact
Send Message
Release Date
TBD
Mod Watch
Track this mod
Share
Style
Genre
Real Time Strategy
Theme
War
Players
Single Player
Embed Buttons

Promote Axis & Allies: Uncommon Valor on your homepage or blog by selecting a button and using the HTML code provided (more).

Axis & Allies:  Uncommon Valor
Axis & Allies:  Uncommon Valor
Statistics
Rank
1,404 of 22,297
Last Update
5 days ago
Watchers
83 members