An expansion/overhaul mod of epic proportions, with entirely rebalanced gameplay, expanded factions, new gametypes, graphical overhauls, and five new factions; stealth-based Confederate Revolutionaries, tower defense-inspired Atomic Kingdom of China, economy-focused Mediterranean Syndicate, DotA-esque Order of the Talon and spammy Electrical Protectorate.
Posts | ||
---|---|---|
If you could have one piece of Paradox tech... | Locked | |
Thread Options | 1 2 | |
|
Jan 6 2011 Anchor | |
What would it be? -- Quick its 2am! Do you know where your base is? |
||
|
Jan 6 2011 Anchor | |
duh. the time machine. use it and create MORE paradox tech. Edited by: GearsGoAwryMan --
|
||
|
Jan 6 2011 Anchor | |
Apoc Tank. Never have to worry about traffic jams ever again! -- Yours faithfully, That guy who does hammy stuff on a regular basis. |
||
Jan 6 2011 Anchor | ||
The Mecha Tengu. So I can drive while I fly while I drive |
||
|
Jan 6 2011 Anchor | |
Spacefolding. I could sell it to the government for a ton of money, it would make real-life fusion a breeze, and faster than light travel would be just around the corner with it. |
||
Jan 6 2011 Anchor | ||
Advanced Nanotechnology would probably have some interesting uses. |
||
|
Jan 7 2011 Anchor | |
A Ushanka... wait, already have one An airship that is apparently made of Depleted Uranium cladded with Chobham armour, is filled with more bombs that one can ever EVER use, and is still capable of flying. That would be awesome )) |
||
|
Jan 7 2011 Anchor | |
I'd like to get my hands on some Syndicate Railguns - simply because I've always loved the sci-fi aspect of railguns and kinetic-kill weapons. Plus the power cells that can generate the kind of power that railguns need would be worth a pretty penny. A close second would be zero-point energy. Probably more beneficial to the world as a whole but less personally exciting for me. So, what can we conclude from this? Edited by: Joshh -- ------------------------------------- |
||
Jan 7 2011 Anchor | ||
Chronotechnology. If I just get myself a car, I can see the world for free. With no CO2 emissions! |
||
|
Jan 7 2011 Anchor | |
The Achilles and its related technology and blue prints to make its fuel and repair it. Traveling into holidays never was easier. -- 4d 61 70 70 65 72 20 69 6e 20 74 72 61 69 6e 69 6e 67 |
||
Jan 7 2011 Anchor | ||
I personally don't think I could handle not getting majorly airsick in an Achilles. I'll take a Rosen Bridging tank over that any day. (On a much less impressive note, the thing is amphibious- meaning boat trips and possible fishing anywhere in the world!) Edited by: Galgus |
||
|
Jan 7 2011 Anchor | |
I personally would like Cybernetics over my be-loved PAWI. It has the potential to increase life-span and expand our knowledge in prosthetics. -- Quick its 2am! Do you know where your base is? |
||
|
Jan 7 2011 Anchor | |
Nope, I just live where everyone drives everywhere, and despite having a reasonable set of motorways and public transport and a relatively small population; everything turns to crap in peak hour. From my house, It'll take you an hour maybe even an hour and a half to reach the city center. Having a tank starts to make sense. -- Yours faithfully, That guy who does hammy stuff on a regular basis. |
||
|
Jan 7 2011 Anchor | |
not when it's so huge you can't avoid killing EVERYTHING in your way... |
||
|
Jan 7 2011 Anchor | |
That's when everything gets out of my way! -- Yours faithfully, That guy who does hammy stuff on a regular basis. |
||
Jan 7 2011 Anchor | ||
That's when the police shoot you down from the helicopter - 1960's armor would be vulnerable to modern armaments, and you only get those rocket pods at heroic! |
||
|
Jan 7 2011 Anchor | |
They'd have to call in the national guard, nothing the police or swat teams have could penetrate Apocalypse armor. Probably nothing short of national guard Apaches and Bradleys could do anything to the Apocalypse. And besides, you probably have crushed enough idiot drivers to become heroic. -- ------------------------------------- |
||
|
Jan 8 2011 Anchor | |
Then you own the apaches with missiles. --
|
||
|
Jan 12 2011 Anchor | |
I would like a nuke. Oh wait, I already have one. *Facepalm* Fine. I would like two nukes. -- >.< |
||
|
Jan 14 2011 Anchor | |
erm, a heroic apocalypse on the road would have the allies release their new weapon, the future-futuretank X 5000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 --
|
||
|
Jan 14 2011 Anchor | |
Good luck transporting it halfway across the planet before I've finished stomping people! *remembers chronosphere and how it doesn't exist because noone decided to bring that; then pitifully attempts to return thread back to topic* -- Yours faithfully, That guy who does hammy stuff on a regular basis. |
||
|
Jan 15 2011 Anchor | |
Ever hear of the smiple method of firing the thing with a cannon? As long as it lands on yo, it's fine. Edited by: GearsGoAwryMan --
|
||
|
Jan 15 2011 Anchor | |
aw, to sad tayya brought one... |
||
|
Jan 15 2011 Anchor | |
Crap... Puny Allied stuff gets crushed under my tank. -- Yours faithfully, That guy who does hammy stuff on a regular basis. |
||
|
Jan 21 2011 Anchor | |
I'd take the MCV since it has all those teches built in with an additional License To Crush Everything Smaller Than A House. --
|
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.