Tiberian Apocalypse is a Partial Conversion for Command and Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars with the goal to create a true Tiberian Sun sequel. GDI, Nod and the Scrin are getting a complete overhaul.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
view previous next
Post comment Comments
Sarge_Rho Author
Sarge_Rho May 29 2011, 9:50pm says:

I thought the TS Hover MRLS is way too iconic to replace it with something. Would you prefer this, or the current one?

+5 votes   reply to comment
Jeffman12 May 29 2011, 11:43pm replied:

I kinda wanna see a side-by-side. But I like this one.

+4 votes     reply to comment
((;^GrimReaper^;)) May 30 2011, 2:01am replied:

i like this one..i mean the older was ok but i like this one..it looks like the hit-n-run vehicle i remember..brings back ts memories...the other and this one are both great but i have to vote for this one

+5 votes     reply to comment
yoda589 May 30 2011, 6:15am replied:

considering that Tib apoc, is ment to be something like an tiberian sun sequel, i think that the older version looks better, looks a lot newer and updated from the original tiberian sun Hover MRLS, but you can add both, just the this one is faster but less armored while the old model is slower but more heavily armored. just an idea, dont want your model to go to waste :D

+1 vote     reply to comment
PetrifiedPenguin May 29 2011, 10:02pm says:

Looks great but I personally preferred the older model.


+10 votes     reply to comment
MrTaxikiller May 29 2011, 10:15pm replied:

karma for you for the old render

+3 votes     reply to comment
SlayerX3 May 29 2011, 10:26pm replied:

I second that. That older model does look great, but it would be nice not jumping into conclusions before seeing how this new one will be skinned.

+4 votes     reply to comment
opscomm May 29 2011, 10:19pm says:

I like this one better

+5 votes     reply to comment
SG1Shadow May 29 2011, 10:25pm says:

this one looks better

+6 votes     reply to comment
AYBABTU May 29 2011, 10:35pm says:

I like this one better to

+4 votes     reply to comment
Miko101 May 29 2011, 10:46pm says:

Use the older one please.

+3 votes     reply to comment
LULZferBAKON May 29 2011, 11:11pm says:

I look the older one honestly.

+2 votes     reply to comment
LULZferBAKON Jun 1 2011, 3:39am replied:

Like* Seriously, why do I come back to these older posts days later and find blatantly obvious spelling errors?

+1 vote     reply to comment
Chinka May 29 2011, 11:23pm says:

This model looks lighter - I don't know whether too light

+3 votes     reply to comment
THRRRPT May 29 2011, 11:45pm says:

I prefer this one as well. Just looks more well-designed.

+5 votes     reply to comment
Anubis_theDark May 30 2011, 3:18am says:

Yeah sorry MC, but the old one just looks more high-tech and more massive so i totally prefer that one. This one is cool, but it just looks to much like the TS one. The old one has a more modern feel to it :P .

+6 votes     reply to comment
CandCJosephNoob May 30 2011, 3:41am says:

This is better keep up!!

+4 votes     reply to comment
Keksz May 30 2011, 4:47am says:

This one! ^^

+5 votes     reply to comment
php_bg May 30 2011, 12:09pm says:

I really like the rocket pods on this one better. I vote for this one.

+1 vote     reply to comment
GooberTrooper May 30 2011, 12:31pm says:

I vote for the older model.

+2 votes     reply to comment
RaGod May 30 2011, 9:54pm says:

I vote for the older model

+1 vote     reply to comment
php_bg May 31 2011, 8:14am says:

The old model is too bulky, IMHO, while this is a lot sleeker, which is something I've always loved about the TS MRLS. Maybe some will argue that being bulkier, the old one fits GDI's heavy steamroller style better, but don't forget that the MRLS is still designed to be a light, fast hit&run hover vehicle.

+2 votes     reply to comment
master_oli-p May 31 2011, 10:10am says:

personally, i prefer the older one too

+1 vote     reply to comment
darkdust43 May 31 2011, 6:39pm says:

this one looks more strike force where the other one looks more assault like its a support unit for the tanks and walkers but can still take a decent amount of damage. maybe use both one as a scout/light strike force with multi role missles and the other as a large assault support unit (large assault i mean a good sized force) with heavyier missles that have to be switched from anti-ground to anti air or just only one missle that is only anti-ground

+1 vote     reply to comment
willychong8921 Jun 2 2011, 8:59am says:

How is this MLRS supposed to fire? Is it like rocket barrage or precision missile strik? Personally I prefer precision missile strike with barrage ability(long cool down time :) make it more useful

+2 votes     reply to comment
DaViperDragon Jun 5 2011, 1:36pm says:

i prefer the Current one if possible

+1 vote     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Image Details
May 29th, 2011
Embed (big)
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only