This mod also works with Company of Heroes and/or Tales of Valor. Opposing Fronts is not required! There are many features that I added, for example: - a much more realistic Weapon damage system - many new skins for infantry and tanks (and wrecks) also including many of my own made tank skins - many new units for all factions - modified and enlarged Commander Trees (now 16 Upgrades!) - new abilities - new sounds - recommended new maps included

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
New model: StuG III
embed
share
view previous next
 
Post comment Comments  (0 - 50 of 69)
stukatankkiller
stukatankkiller Feb 12 2012, 12:03pm says:

MY LIFE it is complete !

+24 votes     reply to comment
neosdark
neosdark Feb 12 2012, 12:05pm replied:

I second that statement!!

+15 votes     reply to comment
DoctorSchmerz
DoctorSchmerz Feb 12 2012, 12:14pm replied:

TOTALLY AGREED!! I thrid the statement!

+9 votes     reply to comment
Sturminfantrist
Sturminfantrist Feb 12 2012, 12:21pm replied:

Dito, nice camo, Hinterhaltstarnung. Thats early G ,can i upgrade this StuG with Schürtzen and Saukopf?

+10 votes     reply to comment
AwayPeskyFlies
AwayPeskyFlies Feb 12 2012, 8:15pm replied:

Can someone explain to me why everyone loves stug 3? Cuz i just dont get it

+3 votes     reply to comment
burkovski
burkovski Feb 13 2012, 5:00am replied:

the tank with the best performance in ww2... 20,000 destroyeed tanks DA FAK and its LIGHT not heavy TD like tiger, panther ..and it looks badass

+6 votes     reply to comment
Sturminfantrist
Sturminfantrist Feb 13 2012, 8:28am replied:

Thats right, Sir!And very important, it was easy to produce.

+6 votes     reply to comment
QuakeRiley
QuakeRiley Feb 13 2012, 12:20pm replied:

It weights what, about a ton less than a Panzer IV which is big anyway. More produced because of having no turret which meant cheaper, quicker and smaller results.

+3 votes     reply to comment
Rastaman
Rastaman Feb 13 2012, 5:19am replied:

Uhm just look at it!! And it was no tank btw..

+1 vote     reply to comment
DoctorSchmerz
DoctorSchmerz Feb 13 2012, 10:51am replied:

Maybe because its the most produced German fighting vehicle? Or maybe that it could still stop almost any Allied tanks even in late stages of war?

+5 votes     reply to comment
willychong8921
willychong8921 Feb 13 2012, 7:02am replied:

Only the Finest in German Engineering!!!!

+8 votes     reply to comment
doom44
doom44 Feb 12 2012, 12:28pm says:

I hope this will be more common than the StuG IV, because the StuG IV was not produced as much as the StuG III.

+6 votes     reply to comment
kijebe
kijebe Feb 12 2012, 12:34pm says:

funny thing is, in real life i would never be ab;e to tell the difference between this thing and a bush...

GODDAMN CAMOFLAGE!!!!!!!

+2 votes     reply to comment
spetsnaz_stalker
spetsnaz_stalker Feb 12 2012, 1:06pm says:

my fav TD in world of tanks:D

+6 votes     reply to comment
stukatankkiller
stukatankkiller Feb 12 2012, 1:41pm replied:

I like slugger :P

-1 votes     reply to comment
willychong8921
willychong8921 Mar 2 2012, 10:19am replied:

Too bad XD

+1 vote     reply to comment
voyager-m
voyager-m Feb 12 2012, 2:13pm says:

This is in blender? Or max?

+1 vote     reply to comment
Xalibur
Xalibur Feb 12 2012, 2:20pm replied:

it`s a COH WorldBuilder screen

+2 votes     reply to comment
voyager-m
voyager-m Feb 13 2012, 2:44am replied:

I mean in what app. this model was created.

+1 vote     reply to comment
aidas2
aidas2 Feb 13 2012, 8:14am replied:

3Ds max.

+1 vote     reply to comment
JesusOfCalgary
JesusOfCalgary Feb 12 2012, 3:25pm says:

Will there be the amphibious jeep as possibly a jeep replacement? DMz made one and released it to the community this morning!

+2 votes     reply to comment
LethalDosage
LethalDosage Feb 13 2012, 2:30am replied:

really!? i better head over there...

+1 vote     reply to comment
Jkl22d
Jkl22d Feb 12 2012, 6:37pm says:

:o nice work

+1 vote     reply to comment
LethalDosage
LethalDosage Feb 13 2012, 2:33am says:

lovely skin. So i take it from the Credits, that it's based off of DMz's Ambush Dot camo skin? It looks totally different, whatever colour tweaks you aparently did really changed it's appearance!

Will it be able to have both the Roof gunner and and tank commander at the same time, or an "either/or" thing where you can only have one at a time?

+1 vote     reply to comment
Xalibur
Xalibur Feb 13 2012, 3:50pm replied:

Hi Lethal,
yes I tweaked around with the colours because DMz`s released skin was a bit to ...plain and didn`t really fit in BK colour scheme. So I carved out the 3 base colours a bit more ;)

It will be able to show both: the gunner and (if boarded) the tank commander!

+2 votes     reply to comment
QuakeRiley
QuakeRiley Feb 13 2012, 11:34am buried:

(buried)

Sooooooo, what is the point of this? Same speed as the StuG IV, same armour, almost identical dimentions, same gun etc. I seriously can't see how this would fit in.

-5 votes     reply to comment
doom44
doom44 Feb 13 2012, 3:12pm replied:

Based on the Panzer III chassis, so it has better mobility. And, it is not the same gun BTW. It is the 75mm L/43, not the L/48 the StuG IV has.

+1 vote     reply to comment
QuakeRiley
QuakeRiley Feb 13 2012, 4:07pm replied:

I know that, but it is similar dimentions to the StuG IV, same gun.

-4 votes     reply to comment
doom44
doom44 Feb 14 2012, 12:25pm replied:

It is not the same gun. The L/43 was not the same as the L/48 the StuG IV has. Different muzzle velocity and barrel lengths.

0 votes     reply to comment
QuakeRiley
QuakeRiley Feb 16 2012, 5:33pm replied:

I go by latest versions, Ausf. G has the L.48

+2 votes     reply to comment
AwayPeskyFlies
AwayPeskyFlies Jan 13 2013, 2:43pm replied:

so the stug 4 has a better gun, l/48 is better than the l/43

+1 vote     reply to comment
Xalibur
Xalibur Feb 13 2012, 3:57pm replied:

I've only done it to annoy you ;) Another bad bad german vehicle bloating the allready overloaded axis vehicle pool...

Joke aside: I know that it is nearly equal to the StugIV in many ways but I`ve included it because I know that many BK player will simply love it... It was a main part of the axis tank batallions and it was simply missed in COH! The others will know what I mean ;)

+11 votes     reply to comment
QuakeRiley
QuakeRiley Feb 13 2012, 4:09pm buried:

(buried)

It would not be in tank battalions because it's not a tank, it's an assault gun. The Germans have the StuG IV which is nigh identical, it's like giving the Americans a M4 and M4A1.

-6 votes     reply to comment
blitzfire5
blitzfire5 Feb 13 2012, 4:21pm replied:

m4s had 105's....

+1 vote     reply to comment
QuakeRiley
QuakeRiley Feb 13 2012, 4:25pm replied:

They also had HVSS.

+2 votes     reply to comment
doom44
doom44 Feb 14 2012, 12:28pm replied:

They made whole battalions of StuG IIIs because it was a reliable anti-tank and infantry support vehicle. Look it up.

+4 votes     reply to comment
willychong8921
willychong8921 Mar 1 2012, 8:25pm replied:

Well, in Eastern Front some Stug III was attached to the 501st Heavy Tank Battalion along with the Panzer III to bolstered the destroyed Panzer III and Tigers. And increasingly replacing tanks as they are attached into tank battalion as substitute to replace losses which could not be replace with conventional tank, assault gun like stug iii is not the best solution, but at least a powerful stopgap!

+1 vote     reply to comment
JesusOfCalgary
JesusOfCalgary Feb 13 2012, 5:51pm says:

PROkiller16, Well for one thing the stug IV was never converted to the StuH (as far as I understand) and so now the StuH is historically correct, and another reason is because it is super f***ing sexy!

+4 votes     reply to comment
QuakeRiley
QuakeRiley Feb 13 2012, 6:01pm replied:

I'm not comparing the StuH 42! I am comparing how they share nigh identical specs. And it looks crapy, I'd go for a Panzer II anyday.

-1 votes     reply to comment
JesusOfCalgary
JesusOfCalgary Feb 13 2012, 6:11pm says:

Well, everything looks crappy to you apparently, that's what I understand from the last few pages, no point in arguing with you.

+3 votes     reply to comment
QuakeRiley
QuakeRiley Feb 13 2012, 6:29pm replied:

I like German engineering, just when it comes with a turret or isn't a German tank. I think Hetzers are lovely little tank destoryers and things to love, but Marders and StuG don't have an appeal. But you seem to make the point it is being added because it's nice looking.

-4 votes     reply to comment
Caselius
Caselius Feb 14 2012, 12:03am says:

StuG is one of my fav tanks, It ain't as crap before think. I readed about one Finnish StuG III destroying an ISU-152 and two T-34/85's in row. Later the same tank destroyed an IS tank.

+4 votes     reply to comment
QuakeRiley
QuakeRiley Feb 16 2012, 11:46pm replied:

Are you sure it killed an IS? Either it hit it in the side or rear at small range or someone was boasting.

+3 votes     reply to comment
Guest
Guest Jun 9 2013, 7:24am replied:

This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.

reflecthofgeismar
reflecthofgeismar Feb 14 2012, 11:25am says:

StuG III – Sd.Kfz. 142, 142/1 = 9241 + 173 upgraded PzKpfW III
totally = 9414 StuG III
StuG IV – Sd.Kfz. 163 = ca. 1100
PzKpfW IV Sd.Kfz 161 = 8254 (all versions)


+3 votes     reply to comment
Szeder
Szeder Feb 14 2012, 2:33pm says:

ME GUSTA

+1 vote     reply to comment
cordenand
cordenand Feb 14 2012, 4:03pm says:

stugs were probably the most efactive german tank destroyers they racked kills like crazy in the ussr lands T34 drivers hated them and were ordered later on not to use face to face rush attacks while fighting stugs lol

+4 votes     reply to comment
QuakeRiley
QuakeRiley Feb 15 2012, 5:55pm buried:

(buried)

Assault Gun. And the T34s had pretty bad armour, it's like a Panther driver boasting a Sherman kill.

-6 votes     reply to comment
ubermensche
ubermensche Feb 15 2012, 6:05pm replied:

One of the main problems of all Russian tank crews was their lack of training. Soviet tank crewmen were mainly composed of draftees while Panzer crews were all volounteers. Soviet tank crews were considered combat ready if they knew how to start the tank, drive it and fire the gun (they were only allowed to fire 3 rounds and one MG mag during their whole training period). However, German Panzer crewmen had up to 6 months of training. Drivers were taught to make independant decisions and to use the terrain, while gunners had to be able to score a number of kills at pop-up moving targets at ranges of 1000m. IMO, you could give the Germans T-34s and StuGs/Pz IV/ Panthers to the Russians and the results would be the same, if not even more advantageous for the Germans.

+7 votes     reply to comment
AwayPeskyFlies
AwayPeskyFlies Feb 16 2012, 9:50am replied:

on top of better tanks Germany had the best radio systems, and the ones who had the idea to install radios in the tanks, Russians did this later in the war but there radios were ****

+2 votes     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Description

The StuG III. This model will also replace the StuH as it was based on Stug III chasis, and not as relic faulty used on Stug IV!

Credits: model by DMz, animation by Eliw00d, skin by DMz, Inukshuk, Beefy & Xalibur (color adjustments)

Image Details
Type
Entertainment
Date
Feb 12th, 2012
By
Xalibur
Size
750×375
Options
URL
Embed (big)
Embed
Share
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only