« L'homme c'est rien — l'oeuvre c'est tout. » Je suis né et je vis à Babylone, là où les enfants tuent, dealent et volent...

Blog RSS Feed Report abuse So how is it going?

2 comments by feillyne on Jan 15th, 2014

As people were casually asking, well, game dev* goes at a snail's speed (at a mad speed compared to the previous year thou), everything else is snafu or so-so as usual. Constantly getting sidetracked too.

Report abuse Nothing left to say

2 comments by feillyne on Jun 2nd, 2013

Nothing left to say here. :-)

Didn't someone already said that actions speak louder than words?

And PS the previous blog post is just a load of judgmental crap so you have nothing to lose if you ignore it.

Report abuse Gameplay vs graphics vs plot/story

2 comments by feillyne on May 4th, 2013

This blog post was inspired by What is the most beautiful game you've ever played? thread.

Gameplay vs graphics vs plot/story

Which of these is the most important part of a video game? Gameplay? Graphics? Plot, story?

Actually it's an evasive, inaccurate question: importance means nothing here since it's just a highly opiniated personal feeling, it's rather what you focus on in the short run, at a first glance, and what you focus on in the long run, after playing a specific game tens/hundreds of times - especially if you had many "returns", "breaks" and "disengagements".

So what do you focus on before buying, when playing a game? In the short, long run?

Focusing here on:
1) game graphics, or rather the feel of graphics, the style of graphics
2) story
3) and in the long run, many years after the last play... game plot/story again

Well, actually focusing on the game genre first - mainly plaing RTS/RPGs and action "RPGs"/"adventures" (GTA, Saints Row) so that's the real first ninja-thing on the list here.

1. Game graphics vs graphics style?
The question itself begs the question, does it?

Why divide it into game graphics and graphics style all of a sudden? Answers are simple, they begin with "Minecraft" and the "integral part of the game or the gameplay". As a developer noticed here in this thread, there is a huge difference between intentional "bad" graphics and unintentional bad graphics.

Intentional "bad" graphics:
- pixel art
- 2D (or pseudo-2D, some games such as old C&C games mainly use 2D sprites, 3D voxels and the 3D projection, so they are 2D-looking 3D games, 2.5D games)
- text-based

"bad" graphics" which are not "bad" at all, they can only look bad to some people - at least to as few as possible, hopefully. The classic example is Minecraft. The other example is all other pixel art games - where pixelart is not only spotlighted as the main exterior feature but also mastered to perfection.

Unintentional "bad" graphics caused by
- developer's intentional or unintentional omittance, such as a low res texture in place of a high res one
- hardware limits (especially true for many "ancient" 3D games)
- and many other factors, such as time/financial constraints of a developer, etc.

So yes, definitely the graphics style here. It's whether developers succeed at perfecting their style, no matter the style.

Yes yes unfortunately looking at the graphics first when buying a game. The superficial graphics, the fakes. The shallow, banal, repeatable, empty side of the game.

Wouldn't play pixelly-3D Warcraft III, eye-candy Age of Empires III, unhandlable GTA III or tradition-breaking (GUI in the "wrong" place, crawling 3D-only graphics) C&C Generals for their graphics or their graphics style. Gameplay (features, balance, learning curve, non-story missions/challenges, general playability etc) maybe, but definitely not graphics.

Baldur's Gate, needed only a highres/widescreen mod + GUI correction:

High Hedge Friendly Arm Inn

^- no need for any retexture mods at all, after so many years. Originally released back in 1998, that makes Baldur's Gate about 15 years old.

2. and 3. Story?
Yes, the story, the plot, the characters-relationships-and-shit-is-happening-and-someone-has-to-do-something.

That's what... tries, keeps, forces? to return to the game, even after many years. (Yes Baldur's Gates, Icewind Dales, Fallouts looking right at you!)

If a game doesn't have any story - that's bad, since then only gameplay counts, instead of a story. Game balance and gameplay flaws (game breakers, both major and minor tangible nonfeatures) destroy the experience pretty hard. Can't play something that has nothing redeemable (ie a storyline to walk "on" or through and finish) about it to buy it out of its fake-centered misery.

IMHO, neither graphics nor gameplay gives a degree of depth to a game. Not even an ounce. But they are things that make video games immensely interactive, make them different from e.g. books or films. Yes there exist game books - but they are - as the name suggests - game books. Only the plot, the story element is something shared between videogames, books and films.

And as the concept suggests, the story is what acting, voice acting, dialogues convey and it's much less about action, which in moderate quantities serve to intensify experience instead of covering or diminishing the story. To be sincere, it's not always true - some bloodthirsty combat-ridden classics such as Baldur's Gate, Icewind Dale have lots and lots of enemies and opponents to overcome or simply send away packing from the world (to another miserable life in another video game world most likely) still manage to keep players returning to the game because of the usually world-crashing ultrachallenging story. Maybe because gamers ignore all the blood, combat and only remember the story itself? (Which probably gets sucked in by the long term memory.)
Can never know.

Ah, the last thing. The hard-hitting-in-the-face fragment of stories.

It's the revelation of the centrepiece of the story - the person, the thing that started havoc, caused the first riots, began state-gripping and realm-ripping intrigues, and other things turning-the-world-upside-down. It seems pretty awful if it is clearly revealed in the prologue, or the first or the second chapter.

Was extremely enjoying Dragon Age Origins as far as gameplay goes - the thing is - it has all the shitty banalities (especially the "Horde" ouch!), and the plot is revealed right in the prologue and the first chapter. Defeat the evil dragon-demon blah blah and save the kingdom blah blah, slash through evilish hardish hordish mess of monsters blah blah, and all that tropefied... stuff. So in the end, enjoyed Dragon Age II more which was less centered on extreme banalities and the "standard" fantasy side. The Dragon Age II story also seemed to be much less banal than DaO's.

To compare, Baldur's Gate I:
1) what's going on is revealed in the Chapter 6 (unless you know D&D/Forgotten Realms history very well, you basically have no idea of what is going on)
2) the main boss/opponent is encountered at the end of prologue
3) the centre piece is a conspiracy, but not that banal world domination or world destruction plot - but the (spoilers) apotheosis of the godspawn Sarevok - which tried neither to dominate or destroy the world, but to murder his siblings through assassinations or regional wars, to subvert some realms/regions either unknowingly or knowingly to fund his campaign against other children of dead god of murder Bhaal, and ultimately, to become the Lord of Murder himself

So Baldur's Gate feeds players with small bits of the story, of what-is-happening, gradually. Something that suspends mystery and lets it float like a fog over everything you are through.

Something plot-related that seems to be incredible improbable to be featured in the "newer" games. The element of mystery.

Can't believe that developers such as those of Dragon Age Origins (BioWare, but mainly the idea-guy of that... thing) could feed gamers with that fast foodish banalised thousand-times-repeated shit that should have nothing to do with the fantasy genre.
Yes extremely enjoyed DaO - gameplaywise, yet thoroughly loathed the banal plot and the setting. Couldn't return to it even twice (played only once through), while already finished Dragon Age II like 3 times - because of less banal story/setting mumbojumbo.

Another instance of the truth that mainstream sells stereotyped crap because such crap sells.

Uh, this blog post mutated and became longer than planned. Let's finish.

So. Looking at fakes first (graphics, graphics style, game genre), then in the middle and in the end at the game depth (story, plot). Mainly a single player here, that's why. Multi players would probably focus more on the gameplay rather than the story. To note, "player-initiated", custom role playing e.g. in MMOs would be a completely new subject to cover, and maybe something plot/story related as well. Would that count as story/plot or as gameplay? You decide.

Two questions for you.
What do you focus on in the short, long run? Was there any games that you made an exception for, that you played for entirely different reasons than normally?

Licence: This whole text is licensed under Creative Commons Zero (public domain): Creativecommons.org can be diffused, copied, distributed, edited, published anywhere without any credit given.

Report abuse A perfect form of government?

16 comments by feillyne on Jul 7th, 2012


So, what's your idea of a perfect government or a perfect sociopolitical system?

IMHO, a council-based government:
1) abolishment of all godheads/idols/single-concentrated forms of governments - a gov't of Councils rather than presidents/PMs/ministers/whatever, a group-based government, the top power to one specific group without a presidential spokesman or anything similar
2) purely resource-based
3) communication of needs through the Internet or similar technology

Everything for free, and work would be also for free. Any products of work would go to the community. Additional resources & rewards for quality work. (Right now this world is all profit-based: as cheaply as possible as quality as possible.) As high quality as possible and as safe as possible, with less consideration of amounts of resources used to achieve that. More prevention & responsibility-based system. Doing what's needed with high safety measures (instead of doing what's needed but as cheaply as possible resulting in drawbacks, flaws due to economical and time constraints).


1. councils instead of presidents
2. minister groups instead of ministers
and so on.

Generally groups & boards deciding about everything. No central person at all or even any form of a leader of a committee/council.

2) & 3)
1. The council government distributes the natural wealth and resources. (In the current world "natural wealth" and products are distributed by companies/corporations/banks/etc and people among themselves while the gov't only regulates everything.)
2. This distribution of wealth to those who actually need it would be possible thanks to the Internet or any similar technology. (Communication of needs was heavily limited in tribal barter/resource-based governments.)
3. Only people actually interested in governing, gardening/agriculture, would do their jobs. That includes specialists, passionate hobbyists, etc.
4. In a society & culture where everything is free, there would be still many people interested in doing arts, gardening, hobbies, etc. So still everyone would do their kinds of "jobs". The only difference is that it all would be for free.
5. There would be no jobs such as digging rows at all unless there would be extremely advanced technology to make it lightning fast with very little effort. So less manual labour, everything would be more dependent on right technology to achieve better results with drastically less hard work.

Further points

1. No classes or political parties, only councils
2. Preferably no nations as countries at all, just nations as local/national councils
3. Entire society of geniuses (children from 4 years old up to 8 years old taught ethics and advanced science to have easier & better grasp on studies & science later on)
4. Peaceful technology open/open-source


This whole text is licensed under Creative Commons Zero (public domain): Creativecommons.org

Report abuse Tezcatlipoca

3 comments by feillyne on Dec 4th, 2011

A continuation of the previous blog post titled a secret of Toltec shamans.

The entirety of post below is only a hypothesis/belief.

Belief about reality and deity belief of Tezcatlipoca
Toltec knowledge spoke about a different version of Tezcatlipoca. Commonly, Tezcatlipoca is an Aztec god. The belief that Tezcatlipoca is just a god seems to be just a very personalised and deified version of the whole story.

So was everything about the subject said? No, not all at all, it seems. So what's the real belief behind Tezcatlipoca?

Tezcatlipoca = person is mirrored by other people surrounding him = outer worlds reflect the inner world
Tezcatlipoca is a concept that we all are mirrors and reflections of each other. Your friends, relatives and everybody else you meet is said to be a mirror of yourself. Everybody of your associates and friends is supposed to have some of your features and characteristics, sometimes greatly magnified or standing out, and also, you have something nobody seems to have (and that is a mirror exclusively for your friends) but on the most part you are like other people around you.

The closer people seem to be, the more they seem to mirror each other.

So it works like:
like attract like, similar people attract similar people, and everybody you know is a mirror of yourself (a partial one, i.e. every person you're around mirrors something in you)
atheists attract atheistic people, altruist people attract altruistic people (not necessarily attract "pure" atheists or "pure" altruists just people who have some atheism or altruism in them or in their attitude)

Tezcatlipoca: however partial and partially it seems, people seem to be mirrors of each other and mirror each other, each other's features, characteristics, attitudes and goals and many other things.

For example an ignorant, quick-to-angry RPG gamer would naturally attract other RPG gamers, ignorant people, angry people. They would constantly stumble on each other. The surrounding world of his friends/associates as a whole would mirror his own attitude to life.

Summing up
All of above is just a belief that reality is so, that we are mirrors of each other. Whether it's true or false, it's only for you to decide.

Report abuse A secret of Toltec shamans

10 comments by feillyne on Oct 30th, 2011

A secret of Toltec shamans
It seems Toltec shamans either discovered or were given a long time ago a peculiar secret about "luminous beings", a secret about humans, animals and other beings of light (those composed of atoms/energy). So what's the secret?

It's simple: Everyone has a twin, a double that is dreamed by a person (called the dreamed). Moreover, this very double can dream about his own twin (himself) in his dream. (A dream within a dream.)

What does that mean? Well, it may mean that we (our bodies) are light that may reflect itself just like regular light.

So yes, this secret appears very simple... yet it's the awareness of the twin that counts, and the practice to make oneself aware of him, which is the other part (99%) of the whole secret.

The art of stalking
The one who received and mastered art of dreaming (being aware of the dreamed twin, and interacting through it) and art of stalking (watching one's routines, thoughts, feelings, addictions in order to trap them to either have control over them or to get rid of them) was called a Toltec. Anthropology seems to be very little aware of that meaning of the word "Toltec".

What is the art of stalking? It is an art of watching one's mental, personal surroundings: one's own feelings, thoughts, and also addictions.
Once a useless or negative routine, a thought, a feeling, or an addiction is trapped by one's own personal undivided attention, the problem can be easily dealt with and dropped.

If you examined closely your own addictions or notorious unpleasant thoughts (those recurring ones), you see that they have most power when they go without any notice by you. Once you set your utmost focus on them, they are trapped.

For example, person who drinks too much seems to be powerless as long as his attention avoids being focused on the problem. And yes, the same person could make thousands of excuses and create thousands of distractions to avoid facing the problem, even telling himself that he really *knows* about the problem! Knowing about it is nothing; it's the attention on it that counts! Also, person must be willing to do anything, first. Without the said person's decision and own free will the attention seems to remain useless and headless, like a ship without a captain. Dropping anything whether it seems "positive" or "negative" requires one's choice.

Toltecs would also stalk their own daily routines simply to get rid of them, and live a more mysterious, exciting life. :-)

Report abuse Desura publishing

2 comments by feillyne on Jun 27th, 2011

Yeah, slacking off publishing various stuff on Desura now.

So, for a start, the most notorious & important issue for C&C fans: Generals mods. What about them? When will they be published?

Desura installs standard mods (those that install to a separate folder and are run through a command) quite fine. Only there seems to be a few problems with installing and testing complex ones, such as mods for Generals Zero Hour or Age of Empires III.

So publication of them may be a bit delayed (a couple of weeks or so).

* * *

Controversial non-gaming related blog posts (you read them at your own risk!):
lie/truth blogpost
to end it (a final note)

PS Pleiadians.net ;-P

Report abuse To end it

2 comments by feillyne on Apr 23rd, 2011

Previous blog posts:
lie/truth blogpost

As previously, you can disbelieve or believe whatever written here - still, checking at least some of it (at least who or what are Pleiadians) would be much more appreciated. To be sincere about that, believing or disbelieving without question anything they tell you, whoever tells you, seems to be quite foolhardy.

You may consider it complete dreck, yet do you think that pro's, e.g. scientists, are right all the time? So what about former fringe theories, for example, the contintental drift? What about them? Maybe you can tell us. Same was with Mendeleev - at first he was laughed at when he was juxtaposing the periodic table. How has it ended? Who had the last laugh? Still, all of it doesn't make Mendeleev a saint or a person right about everything. Nobody is truly a saint or a culprit yet there are many who would lionise* some groups and completely damn others to hell. We are who we are, yet the collective 'what' of what we've done seems to consist of both wrongs and rights interpreted variously by different groups and thinking systems - more so if we take alternative costs into consideration.

* BTW, to nail it, lions are filthy slackers sitting on their arses while it's lionesses that do their dirty work (including hunting) - and more. So to 'lionise' would be a very accurate expression here.

Cutting the bullshit short
Let's browse through other examples of the so-called "extraterrestrial" (extra-egoist, extra-yourself, extra-your-OWN-not-other's-Earth-or-planet-isn't-it-you-egocentric-mankind?) influences on the human writings & culture.

Quote:As I looked at the living creatures, I saw a wheel on the ground beside each creature with its four faces. This was the appearance and structure of the wheels: They sparkled like topaz, and all four looked alike. Each appeared to be made like a wheel intersecting a wheel. As they moved, they would go in any one of the four directions the creatures faced; the wheels did not change direction as the creatures went. Their rims were high and awesome, and all four rims were full of eyes all around.

Just a fragment of the first chapter of book of Ezekiel. (Ezekiel, 1:22-24)

So, did you figure out what is actually described here by now?

If not, then you can read the first whole chapter of Ezekiel's book to obtain more insight. And BTW, you'll probably have to take "LORD" out of it, it's a pagan coating over it. Bhaal, Baal, means "lord" and the Bible uses extensively the already corrupted (by Roman Catholic scholars) Latin/English translation that contains "LORD" (Baal's) name instead of the Hebrew and other more appropriate terms. You can check dictionary to find out the meaning of "Baal" for yourself.

Noted should be also the difference between the "LORD" as the highest title that replaced aforementioned many different, original and more proper Hebrew terms, and the "lord" or "Lord" as a mere name or a polite/gentle attribute that changes nothing - i.e. "our Lord Christ" (e.g. in Romans 16:18) used for Emmanuel.

Other examples, featured in the previous blog posts as well:

Quote:The Nephilim were on the earth in those days — and also afterward — when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.

Genesis 6:4
Sons of God = heavenly sons = Ouranos = cosmic men
Daughters of men = earthly daughters = Gaia = earthly women

The Greek mythology must have conceptualised it so much that suddenly it became "creation" of the whole world.

So who messed up? Who made up religions?

Humans made religions, customs, rituals, feasts, and "holidays" (or unholy-days as you like).

And isn't it humans alone who wore and still wear priestly robes as their "religious" (non actually existent, only political/mental) source of power? They say the so-called God is omnipresent yet they say "He" is in Heaven! So not in the ground? Not underground? Not in the Earth, not below it? And... what Heaven? The sky? The universe? Not other cosmoses and universes, not space, not other dimensions, only this 3-dimensional "Heaven" (Clouds, isn't it?) that all followers of routine feasts, rituals and celebrations are to be granted?

What churchgoers for... um, heaven's sake? Humans are walking, living churches, cities, blades, torches.
Yeah, you could say that without lamps, electricity or whatever it'll be dark here. So who figured out how to produce & use lamps, who electrified the world with electricity? Lamps did it themselves? Electricity did it itself? Or mayhap it was astrological gods that are in the Rotunda?

And who murders humans? Who steals property depriving somebody of living means or other means? Who does many other similar things clearly violating other's free will? Fucking reptilians? Or maybe fucking HUMANS, humans all the way?...

* * *
* * *
* * *

One line for entertainment industry on the personal profile: there are some Frozenbyte Humble Bundle packages to hand out, nothing in return expected. ;-)

Report abuse The lie - addendum

36 comments by feillyne on Jan 2nd, 2011

An addendum to the truth blog post:

The other reason why the US government keeps the truth from the people, the truth that there are cosmic civilisations out there in the universe beyond the Earth (and even on the Earth itself), is that the US government has a specific deal with one of them - the greys.

In exchange for DNA material (human cells, ovum, spermatozoan, and other things taken from humans), greys provide the said government with an anti-gravitational technology.
Greys desperately try to make their own race reproductive again. What's a bit weird, they are also said to despise higher vibrations (of love, tolerance, etc.).

Not quite know about the exact extent of the above co-operation. It appears they have a very close one, because quite a few of UFO sightnings are being reported very close to human (mostly American) military bases.

Whether you believe or disbelieve in all this, you'll probably agree on one thing: the Earth is a part of the cosmos, of the universe, and therefore we all are cosmic beings. ;-) One way or another.

So what are their main messages?
Pleiadian: to help the poor, support those are truthful (remember those great inventors and thinkers that were opposed and persecuted by the Church sowing propagandae and lies?), spread the message of Love
Andromedan: to take responsibility for one's actions [whatever these actions are]

So now what was promised earlier.

How to get your own proofs

1. Hypnosis of friends. To learn how to do that, you simply need to browse various reliable source files available throughout the Internet.

First, some safety rules:
1) shut off all mental influences of others ("others" in a very broad sense if you catch my meaning) during the session, i.e. you need to rise a mental barrier around your friend
2) ask him to answer only your questions that are critical to the experiment (nothing personal)

Second, the main experiment.

3-20 of your friends consenting to the experiment.
Those friends must have avoided researching/studying astronomy, constellations, star systems, reading science-fiction, etc. (you can ask them during the hypnosis session whether they have consciously researched any of these just to be sure).
Also these friends should have never claimed any abductions, etc.

All set? Okay...

Then ask them to draw or describe (depending on whether they are good at sketches & drawing) Pleiades, constellation/galaxy of Andromeda, Sirius A and B. (And also others, such as a planet Zeta Reticuli.)

That's just a beginning. Now ask them to characterise or draw THOSE who dwell in/on these constellations/systems/planets.

Finally, compare the data gathered from your different friends.


All in our DNA holding the above information, in our subconsciousness... we all know them subconsciously. ALL of us. [Luke 17:20-21, "the kingdom of God is within you" has also a different meaning than that spiritual one.]

2. Direct contact.

You can contact some of those via deep states of meditation, prayer, dreams, etc.

You may avoid contacting Elohim who has chosen Jews to be their selected/favourite people, as communicating with these cosmic beings can be simply bothering or whining to them.

Pleiadians have a different set of symbols, but the common one is a triangle with a circle (or circles) inside it. You can visualise it to reach a mental contact.

And yes, contacting may be bothersome to them (and others out there).

So it's solely you who takes rensposibility for your communication - and also for the change of your world view after the contact.

3. Just wait up to December 2012. According to Yeshua, he'll bring Pleiadians (and possibly others, 10,000 of them all) with him to the Earth:
I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.
John 10:16

Those will be possibly besmirched as devils by presidents e.g. Obama, the pope (or the regent), bankers, etc. all those who are drunk with political or religious power and are blind to these love-filled female-energised (non-violent/aggressive) beings.

The day they arrive, religions and governments as we know them - will start falling apart.

Regarding events that can or can't happen in 2011 and 2012:
everything's a belief system. If you truly believe that you'll meet your friends while going for a walk, then you'll meet him. Same goes for the actual reality.

So what's up with that apocalypse scenario where the US and other countries are flooded & filled with various terrible disasters (and even nuked)?

In fact, there at least 3 different 'major' futures in store for us:
1) The one world government rises to power, there are protests, people are murdered, RFID chipped, there's much pain everywhere... till they [Pleiadians] come and solve the problem (the bestial, rogue one world government) and guide painfully nations into obedience and "kill" (immobilise) those who turn against them with sonic weapons (sonic weapons, the so called "sword coming from the mouth" of Yeshua in the Bible).

2) Somebody nukes Jupiter to grant our wish of Hell - everything goes out of hand on account of Jupiter igniting into a star (all major disasters can be man-made or are a result of a human error/intention, 9/11, the recent Gulf Coast oil spill, and even regular disasters seem to be supposedly possible with HAARP). "Somebody", i.e. a human government, one of those cosmic races, etc. All triggered by multiplied human wish fueled by their hate and ignorance (they believe, fuel it with their hate, somebody else grants their wish, simple). This supposed wish would be a deed, not a word. Humankind doesn't fucking need to think about it at all. All they need is focus.
Pleiadians/Elohim/others would come only to rescue those chosen by them. The rest of mankind would be left to face a new star - Jupiter. The physical "Hell" Yeshua was probably talking about.

3) The human governments are either re-formed or changed, the corruption is uprooted by humans themselves, there's much more human activism and human rights are much more upheld (Pleiadians come only with a good word and to help humans grow).

So why and what for that bet with open_sketchbook? Simply to prepare for the worst. Hoping and fighting for the best, but preparing for the worst. (The bet itself to learn something from it.)

The final truth is that we all (as consciousnesses) are equal. Every single one of us. But we don't fucking see any equality here on the Earth. No fucking equality. And it's about something different from "having more" or "having less", something else than taking material things from each other like a bunch of mad dogs.

It's about RIGHTS themselves. An equal right to breathe, an equal right to water, an equal free right to be provided with everything you need to do your work, to develop yourself, to grow... up. To education suitable for your needs without fucking being enslaved to debts reaching up to e.g. 100,000 dollars.

Can churches of stone, dead temples, serve to worship anything? Can dead astrologically commanded rituals, routine deeds just for purposes of posing, bring you any fruit?

Your body is the temple of God. Your body is the church of God. Not the God Creator, but the God Creator, Preserver, Destroyer <- all of them.

Something comes to life, lasts for a certain period of time, then turns into smaller pieces (entropy). That's the way of material things, our temporary reality.

(re)Creation, Preservation, Destruction. The truth very ancient Terrans knew perfectly, the truth that was corrupted and denigrated into the concept of Osiris, Isis, and Horus - the Father (Creator), the Mother (Preserver), the Child (Destroyer).

You don't need to believe anything here at all. You can disbelieve, disagree with anything you wish. [And one needs to choose sides carefully. If you choose to be neutral, the victorious side will simply ignore you and you won't profit from anything the side won.]

And yes, you can do everything, but only a few actions are truly profitable. Others lead to a fuckin' deep, deeeeeeep ditch. And those involved in pushing for one world government, e.g. Bushes (George Bush senior about the matter), Rockefellers (especially David Rockefeller), Rothschilds, and many others - they plan to introduce a slave equality.

A slave equality based on Marxist ideals, but in practice - a twisted version of Marxism. RFID chipped humans as the slaves, the base of pyramid, and them - the "omnipotent" elite - at the top, the all-seeing eye.

A decision to make - open-source, free energy, freeware, clean pleasures, people, etc., or them - slavery, temporary ignorant pleasures, etc. or even being neutral and having nothing from any of them.

Report abuse The lie

25 comments by feillyne on Nov 24th, 2010

What's the truth?

The truth is that we are not alone. The truth that the governments, particularly the US government, want to hide, want to blind us from, is "extreterrestrial", or rather, COSMIC civilisations consisting of highly intelligent beings (technologically, spiritually, socially advanced) do exist.


Because actually TELLING the people that not only extraterrestrial civilisations exist, but there are 12 of them here going in or from the Earth (according to Robert Dean, a retired Command Sergeant Major), would open the Pandora's box.

Just imagine... riots, a breakup of social structures, and MORE IMPORTANTLY: breakup of the ownership and money, of the POWER of the rich. Simply chaos that is neither handy or useful or controllable to the superrich. The superrich do want chaos, but a CONTROLLABLE one. Not one that gets out of hands.

This truth could abolish any monetary or social/pseudosocial systems, capitalism, communism... could abolish any religions that blindly follow anything that they can't comprehend and claim them to be gods.

But let's cut the bullshit and get straight to the facts. It'd be nice to know that those fucking Hollywood-created green aliens from Mars are pure BS. Lies are lies. Truth is truth.

The life in the universe originated in the Lyra constellation - currently uninhabitated.

Both evolutionists and creationists are wrong, since the evolution is generally true, but the terran human race didn't simply evolve - it was genetically engineered.

Alpha Draconian
Not much about them. A reptilian-like race, they have all the technology we have, etc. they don't like us at all, there's nothing we could offer them except us ourselves - as food, because they pretty much like our meat.

Said to be dumped to this universe by somebody else, they simply waged war with first true humans in Lyra constellation (humans that dispersed and populated other planets) that lasted for approx. 600,000 years (a relative number / time). Nobody can truly eradicate them. The war hasn't officially ended, both sides simply got bored of it.

They have a caste system. There are only 3 social layers there: royalty, military, workers. Slaves too, but they are not part of their society at all. Things don't have any rights, do they?

Supposedly grey-like beings with big heads and some psychic powers. They destroyed their own planet by heavy exploitation, and also they own race since they can't reproduce. They sell technology to the US government in exchange of allowing them to examine and take DNA samples from humans, intending to make themselves reproductive again. (In other words, kidnapping and installing of "nice" or "hospital-like" memories.) Andomedans (below) say they won't succeed - their race is already extinct.

That's their own agenda, because they serve Alpha-Draconian's agenda - to break up social, moral and generally all human structures so Draconians can... take "care" of this little planet.

The Orion Group
No reliable data on them. They side with Alpha Draconian and greys, therefore they should be considered hostile and manipulative.

Probably cousins of Alpha Draconians, they are an advanced race living here on the Earth, plus colonised some planets in our solar system - particularly Mars. They live underground, 2 to 8 kilometers underneath. They love sun and sunshine, even developped a system underground that imitates the solar light.

The race of Illojim, probably Elohim in the Bible, our "creators", they in fact "invented", genetically engineered the human race in a lab, mingling their own DNA (3%) with an ape indigenous one (97%). They despise our sunlight. They left humankind to pretty their own fucking fate leaving our solar system.

They always described reptilians to their "creations", at least these reptilians living underneath as "evil" and servants of darkness - you can see it throughout the Bible too, the programming of humans to think of reptoid races and any snakes/snake-like creatures and animals, reptiles, etc. as those unanimously evil or those who should be feared. Without an exception.

Christ was a son of Mary and "angel" Gabriel. (Now you know why Mary had to be visited by an "angel" with a "message".) Gabriel was a Pleiadian, so was Christ. He incarnated as a human to guide people and teach them Pleiadian rules. Pleiadians are a race that put special focus on children, mothers and the true Love (God), and have no "money"-based economy whatsoever, people are given what they need depending on their contribution to the community. They are absolutely horrified by "fatherlike" beliefs (or any beliefs at all) of the human race and of human religions they consider to be tools purely for control and abuse of human beings.

They live in Pleiades, on Erra planet that is only 10% smaller than the Earth, and keep their population under 400,000.

Blue-skinned advanced "humans" that take great distance to what's happenning on the Earth, and though they are generally friendly towards human beings and desire them to be responsible for what (us) terrans do and free from religious/scientific/other lies, they also say that if the human race doesn't evolve, they simply wipe us out (no use of retards).
They are from the constellation of Andromeda.

These are only some of THOUSANDS races out there. These particular ones had either great interest or great influence on earthly matters.

Your homework (if you agree to it):
Alex Collier interview (transcript)
Alex Collier interview part 1/12 - 120 minutes of interview, the first part - you can switch off/lower sound volume because of the noise at the beginning
The Lacerta Files - Lacerta was/is a reptilian woman that studied human behaviours
Robert Dean about the facts of "alien" presence
The truth told by Robert Dean

Watch carefully Alex Collier's interview made in 1994. He lies uncosciously once, AFAIK, in the 3rd video. Hint: he scratches his ear. You should be able to spot it and know what he unconsciously lies about (contradicting some things he said earlier).

Also, Alex Collier made some unfulfilled predictions, for example New York destroyed and divided up into islands in the year (about) 2001.

How to spot lies/liars:
How to lie:

Alex Collier appears to speak truthfully almost about everything in the interview - even about the NWO and the UN agenda to dismantle the United States. He tells people in the face to prove him wrong about UN articles 55 and 56 that supposedly deal with the US, and that the American Congress doesn't need to abide by the US Constitution.

What's the catch here? There are absolutely NO, NO mention of it, at least in OFFICIAL UN treaty, articles 55 and 56. NO mention at all. And Alex Collier almost screams "prove me wrong!" - that's most astonishing part!

Still, secret protocols, secret clauses are nothing new. For example, in the original Ribbentrop-Molotov pact, there were secret protocols that dealt with the division and share of the Eastern/Middle Europe. Officially, it was just a non-aggression treaty between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.

How many are aware of the true POLICY, agenda of the NWO?

The agenda of NWO, or rather Skull and Bones, the Illuminati - is purely to destroy morality, destroy societies, to break up governments to have people an easy prey to their dark masters - an extraterrestrial civilisation - who they call Lucifer and his "angels" ignorantly of true luciferian real agenda behind "helping" the rich get their toys and expensive mansions and a moment of useless fame.

What about mainstream religions? The truth is also simple.

The TRUE God doesn't need your worship or belief. AT ALL. Priests and those people who call you to "worship" God in THEIR materialist churches and buildings according to THEIR beliefs are liars and manipulators.

God is God of Love, Freedom and Awareness... the only limit of your freedom is where other's freedom begins. Your freedom ends where other's begins. Simple, isn't it?

If you violate somebody's other will, you bring on yourself a judgement and a punishment. Your will is as precious as any other's. Everybody's equal in God's "eyes".

Materialist churches, whether religious dogmas or scientific paradigms - they all are meaningless and false. They were created solely to control people. Science becomes a religion when it strives to cover up the existence of extraterrestrial civilisations, to put forward a simple "evolution" theory that ignores thousands of UFO encounters & reports, the universe consisting of billions of stars and millions of billions of planets...

... do you comprehend? Even REASON itself tells you that ants are not the only ones on the Earth, they are one of very many! So how come we can be alone in the whole universe?! Do you understand what "billions" and "millions" mean IN PRACTICE?

And many mythology/religious beliefs evolve around these cosmic or earthly beings. Humans, retards as they are, wanted to worship anybody (or call them gods) that was unknown to them and use something they can't truly comprehend.

Look at the history. The Bible itself isn't written by one faction of these civilisations, but by many authors and many influences.

Let's take a look at particular passage of the Bible.

Genesis 6:1-2
When men began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose.

Genesis 6:4
The Nephilim were on the earth in those days - and also afterward - when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.

The Bible describes here two strange sorts of beings. First, the Nephilim. Who were they? They were giants. Second, the "sons of God". Otherwise known as Annunaki, literally those who "fell from the heaven", who "came from the heaven" (either crashed or landed their spaceships here).

There are different sorts of evidence that those beings existed, and the FLOOD following these events, also occurred:
1) cultural: you need to study various ancient cultures, every single one of them speaks of a great flood
2) scientific: pyramids were under water at some point in the past (read analyses of pyramids)
3) archaeological: Youtube.com (giants)

Now dispose of archaeological evidence, dismiss cultural one as pure BS, and misinterpret or lead others into misinterpretations (either by approving it or suggesting it or ignoring it) of scientific evidence. YES, that's our situation.

You're laughing? I'm sure you are.

That's how the world works now. Conscious and unconscious lies are the norm, whether performed by scientists or by priests - no fucking difference. They both do great damage to the KNOWLEDGE and awareness of the human race.

Evolutionists and creationists are both wrong, i.e. the evolution theory is basically correct, but not regarding the human race. The human race was genetically engineered basing on primitive apes here and programmed to be stupid, retarded, and biased - perfect slaves.

You know know why there were so many hoaxes to produce the "missing link"? The missing link is out of this world. The 3% of ourselves. We were "produced" in a lab, then left on the Earth to ourselves, perhaps because that one cosmic race - Illojim - considered it a funny experiment...

Some ending words.

We are weak. Physically. Mentally. One can easily hypnotise any of us. We fail at every possible field and many of scientists believe in or are limited by faulty paradigms. The amount of retards, jerks and other so-called "people" is astounding. An extraterrestrial race could very easily conquer this rich planet and make use of its resources, enslaving us in the process (not all, some of us - others would have to be killed so nobody complains/rebels).

We're simply fucked up.

Don't believe anything here. Contact them, contact Pleiadians and Andromedans - those friendly, those who desire us to be free and responsible for our own actions and desire us to avoid worshipping anybody as God.

Contact them, whether by meditation, lucid dreaming or any other form - seek and you'll find. Don't believe - get your proof!

PS Now I understand what mistake I made saying that "God" is jealous. The true God isn't jealous at all. It's these "gods", Illojim (Elohim) and other manipulators, who are "jealous" and want all to worship them... and to be perfect slaves - slaves, perhaps for mines, for resources they could grab from the Earth, perhaps for something else. They also want to hijack the FREE spirituality, the spirituality of something more than materialism, they want us to forsake true Love and true Freedom.

PPS Or just wait till 2012. If Illojim come and enslave you, you yourselves will be the ones to blame. If Alpha Draconians or the Orian Group come and eat or enslave you, you also will be the ones to be blamed. Only yourselves. Nobody else.

The only thing you need to know: Love. The true Love, the true God, the true Light. Understanding. Nothing more. Even if you lack knowledge, the understanding and the hope that finds possibilites and means can save you.