Hey mod devs.
I don't think ( or hope ) this was born out of foul intent, but these are very sensitive topics and your description of the Russo-Georgian could be a bit more impartial. It is basicaly a copy paste of the Russian narrative.
Those conflicts in Georgia didn't exist "always" but became prominent in the 20th century as a result of Bolsehvism and Sovietization. The country is literaly thousands of years old and it's peoples lived, fought and tried to survive mostly against foreign invaders.
Georgia launched a full scale operation, but even the IFFM states it was provoked by the separatists. So it didn't begin by Georgia waking up some day and declaring "hippity hoppity, get off my property".
The conflict escalated as a result of both sides provoking and stinging eachother over the years, and the separatists were able to do so because they had full backing, received support, armament and training from Russia the entire time, violating their peacekeeping mandate, which states them to do the exact opposite and remain impartial, a gorillion times over. Even Russians don't hide the fact they do so just to prevent Georgia from joining NATO. They openly boast about it. Heck, I even understand their perspective and reasoning on that, but it has absolutely nothing to do with "peacekeeping". That is laughable. They have occupied territories that lay far beyond any conflict borders into the main land itself and most of the world recognizes it for what it is. An occupation.
I'm not writing this to start a political debate or to push a pro-Georgian narrative. I would just welcome if the descriptions were a bit more impartial. Maybe I'm reading too much into this, but that's just the impression I got. That's all. Thank you.
Kindest regards,
Yuri.
CommanderYuri
joined
This member has provided no bio about themself...