The L.U.R.K. team wants to provide the best possible experience from Stalker: Shadow of Chernobyl, we don't plan to skew the scope of this game, because I, like many others, fell in love with the game because of the story, the realistic gameplay, and the atmosphere. I plan to preserve and improve on that concept to the best of my abilities, and our team has vowed to do so as well. Which is why we took it upon ourselves to provide that experience. We want to fulfill a niche that's otherwise unfulfilled in the modding community. We want to bring as many features to Stalker without damaging or changing the original theme of the game. While improving upon that concept with features that were dropped off the development cycle from GSC, such as stealth AI, and a strong foundation for balance, as well as dynamic A-Life, and an unprecedented visual presentation that no other Stalker Overhaul can touch.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
M4 progress
embed
share
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Tweet Email a friend
Embed Image
Comments
freedomer
freedomer

well that is one beautiful m4 *_*

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Thesoldierintheswamp
Thesoldierintheswamp

Please... I need the mod... I'm dying!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Millenia Author
Millenia

It's not really up to me unless you want a mod that consists entirely out of completely unbalanced weapons :P

Reply Good karma+2 votes
LeNimble
LeNimble

Yea I would rather my stock wasn't made out of lead.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
niick
niick

(buried)

Nice but I prefer the RIS version like in CoD4

Reply Good karma Bad karma-9 votes
Woozle
Woozle

What is it with people and that extremely ugly and uncomfortable RIS?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+13 votes
DrStrangelov3
DrStrangelov3

they think its tacticool

Reply Good karma Bad karma+8 votes
stalkercze
stalkercze

Well i got M4 with ris at home i know its airsoft gun but is almost the same and if you got the ris cover its very comfortable and why keep hand at the handguard if you got Front grip ? :)

Reply Good karma Bad karma-2 votes
ShadowFear
ShadowFear

I know right? Oh yeah let's put on this holosight that can break easily cause we can't hit **** with normal ironsights that's a lot tougher than glass. REAL. SMART.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
Mudhut
Mudhut

Yeah man, Eotechs are so fragile, that's why there are thousands of them being used by the US Army and Marines...oh, wait.

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
Zombiestubble
Zombiestubble

Bro, M16. Vietnam. Extremely Fragile.

The US still uses "unoptomized" weapons in it's army today. FFS, they have the XM25 Airbust GL, but no bullpup-style ARs like GB, Belgium, France, Israel, China, Austria, Australia, and even Croatia(FAMAS clone). And those are just the ones that ORIGINATE from the countries that use them.

Oh, and many weapons are pretty reliable with an internal holographic sight. The G36 and FNF2000 among others.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Semi_II
Semi_II

What'd the point of RIS be? We have no foregrips, LAMs, or rail mountable flashlights in STALKER. Plus the RIS looks ugly as, anyway.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
plime
plime

That looks ******* nice.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Lоner
Lоner

Background is kinda distracting but I really like the progress so far! Will you give it a suppressor / GL as well?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Millenia Author
Millenia

That's the plan!

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Lоner
Lоner

Awesome! :D

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Millenia Author
Millenia

Actually, now that I think of it, I'm not entirely sure if I'm able to give it the GL without making a RIS foregrip (which I really don't want to do) - the engine doesn't allow removing half of the foregrip to accommodate the GL :(

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Lоner
Lоner

No GL is good as well, doesn't really matter and TBH, I like it with EO + suppressor better ;) looks more tactical

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
DrStrangelov3
DrStrangelov3

make a version with RIS, but give it **** handling.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
Semi_II
Semi_II

This is gonna sound sorta stupid, buuuut... Doesn't the AR15 birdcage-type flash hider fit NATO 22mm grenades? I know it'd pretty much be adding a new ammo type just for one or two weapons, but I guess it'd work. Although I suppose animations would be a problem, too. Hmm.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
RobertSteele
RobertSteele

Hmm. Well, you could attach it down there anyway, favoring gameplay over realism. Or halfheartedly explain it's attaching by, say, somehow strapping it on with duct tape. Or make it look like it's soldered on and not allow it to be unattached once attached. Or hand-wave it's attaching by also attaching a rail to the bottom along with the grenade launcher.

Or, expanding on that last idea, maybe you could make it so that Strelok has to bring his M4 to someone, and pay to have him permanently hack a rail onto his M4, and then the player could attach and detach the M203 at will.

Yeah, I like that idea. Something like that, where you have to have someone modify your M4 (slightly increasing weight and decreasing durability and handling in the process) to allow you to attach the M203.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Millenia Author
Millenia

Or maybe I'll just omit the M203 :P

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Badzhur
Badzhur

Looking good man, nice job!
By the way, when you mount an optic, will it just mount it on the carrying handle or remove the carrying handle and mount it on the rail? It'd be neat if it could be the latter.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Millenia Author
Millenia

The engine doesn't allow you to remove pieces when you attach others :/

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Badzhur
Badzhur

Aaaww dangit D: Any chance of a flattop M4A1 then?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Erik313
Erik313

Still needs work?!?!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
ninjaman999
ninjaman999

HAWT

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Lacedaemonius
Lacedaemonius

Why so much focus on the M4 anyways? Where would we find any sort of AR-15 (save maybe stolen M16A1/A2s) in Ukraine? I would personally much rather see more slavshit. But then beggars can't be choosers.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Millenia Author
Millenia

There's a goddamn LR300 in vanilla and you ask where a standard M4 could possibly come from? :P

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Lacedaemonius
Lacedaemonius

There's also a G36, F2000, L85A1/2, SG550, and SPAS-12 in vanilla, despite not having a SKS, nugget, AK-47/AKM, Tokarev, Saiga or any of the other logical choices. I'm probably in the minority but I just thought vanilla did a terrible job for weapons in all aspects.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Clear_strelok
Clear_strelok

It's clearly implied in the game that many organisations like the mercenaries and the ONU observers brought their own arsenal into the zone, including a lot of NATO weapons. So I don't see the problem with the presence of German, Italian and English modern weapons instead of an SKS, really.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Semi_II
Semi_II

This is just kind of a random thought, but is there any way of defining the possibility of a certain attachment showing up on a type of weapon? Because I got to thinking that you could make the carrying handle/lower handguard a seperate part and give them a 100% chance of being on the weapon. Like I said, I don't know if it can be done, but it's an idea. Although I guess if it was possible it would have been done long ago...

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment
Sign in or join with:

Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.

Description

Still needs work. Getting there slowly..

Details
Date
Size
1800×678
Options
URL
Embed
Embed Thumb
Share
Feed
RSS feed