What would happen if in 1988, Soviet Leader Mikhail Gorbachev was assassinated? CNC Fallout is a total conversion mod for Command and Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars that postulates this very question.
NATO M270 MLRS and M1A2 Abrams MBT
(view original)
Post a comment
Description
Revealing one new unit and an update on another!
NATO’s M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) is a long range heavy rocket artillery vehicle, able to deliver a barrage of up to 6 rockets in very quick succession, hence its nickname “Metal Rain”. The MLRS, however, is completely defenceless from medium or short range and must be well protected at all times.
The NATO M1A2 Abrams is NATO’s main battle tank, and since last seen has received a texture update, and now looks much nicer!
So the bad guys of the world still haven't learned the most important lesson of all. DON'T MESS WITH AMERICA!!! Some Steel Rain will hopefully persuade them to stop trying to blow us up. And by persuade, I mean blow them up first.
ABRAMS ARE NO MATCH TO T-90S !!!!!!
AND THE MRLS ARE NO MATCH FOR THE RUSSIAN 152MM TWIN HOWITZERS !!!!!
USSR FTW !!!!!!! XD
NEVARRRR THE APACHE WILL OWN YOUR T-90's, AND OUR NUKES WILL HIT YOUR 152 TWIN HOWITZERS!
**** T-90
lol t90 vs m1a2 sep ....abrams wins
t90 uses ERA armor witch its only good vs KE penetrators..... no Composite armor, The new HEAT rounds on m1a2 sep will eat through ERA armor like knife through butter.
Abrams it has Composite, RH armor and Du mesh plating, the m1a2 sep also has slat armor on rear(witch renders shoulder fired AT missiles almost useless), and has additional ERA armor on sides .
and offcourse since its nato and not usa the dev can add the Leopard IIA6 witch its even more armored then abrams....that will render the t90 useless .
T90 has composite armor numbskull. And you have it backwards. ERA is more effective against shaped charges like on HEAT rounds or ATGMs. Most ERA isn't useful against KE rounds (though much of the newer Russian reactive armor has a much thinker plate which in theory should be able to knock a Sabot dart to the side.
1 word warthog
....or you could just rush them with Terror Drones
The USSR can be lucky that the NATO uses the M1A2 MBT and not the
Leopard 2A6. These would be a worthy opponent of the T-90!
Considering that the rounds German army is using because of their ecological laws can't penetrate even T-80
Krieg_91 ....you are SO RONG DUDE .....
The MLRS rocket sistem with a M 26 rochet ...can and it will destroy any 152MM Howitzers.
And the T 90 is crap ...it has no targeting stabilization sistem's.
The Leopard 2A6 is the best tank in the world ...German engineering.
true, true, the Leopard is quite probably the best in the world..
but all the ****** T-90s tended to be the Export Models that Russia sold to Saddam, China, etc. There are the real deal, here, Soviet Mass Production model!
Stabilizing has been around since ww2. All modern tanks, T90 included have it. And the Leo 2 is about on par with the other NATO MBTs.
I want that MRLS!
enough about the T-90 already! the reason the M1A2 abrams and Leopard 2A6 own the crap out of it is because they havent met it's experimental replacement prototype. the black eagle tank! own the crap out of any tank NATO has to throw at them. abrams, leopards, challengers, leclercs, you name it, boom.
The Abrams' turret is still to far to the rear.
And Nyangen, it's not the tank, it's the ammunition. Kinetic Energy Penetrators can defeat any armor out there.
it looks like an abrams but its missing the gun next 2 the hatch T-T.