Report poll What FPS Game Engine, is best to MOD?

Poll started by INtense! with 199 votes and 49 comments. Browse the poll archive.

 15%

Quake 1 (29 votes)

 9%

Quake 2 (18 votes)

 13%

Quake 3 Arena (26 votes)

 10%

Unreal Tournmanent (20 votes)

 31%

Unreal Tournmanent 2003 (61 votes)

 2%

Serious Sam 1 & 2 (4 votes)

 2%

Medal of Honour (4 votes)

 6%

C&C: Generals (11 votes)

 13%

Battlefield 1942 (26 votes)

Post comment Comments
INtense!
INtense! Apr 18 2003, 10:03pm says:

The best engine to mod, in terms of 'potential', 'ease of use' and versitility is the Quake 1 engine.

I mean Halflife is built off a modified quake 1 engine, and look how many mods it has. (that is why it is not listed inthe poll)

Sure the engine maybe dated and graphics lacking the lusture of newer titles, but still some fantastic looking stuff is, has and continues to be made for both Quake and Halflife.

+2 votes     reply to comment
hammy-bob
hammy-bob Apr 18 2003, 10:14pm says:

quake 1 is by far the best engine i just looked into coding for it and its so much easier than hl and many other games

+2 votes     reply to comment
GAMESOULjA
GAMESOULjA Apr 18 2003, 11:16pm says:

Im down with UT2003

+2 votes     reply to comment
bigthreesix
bigthreesix Apr 18 2003, 11:27pm says:

ditto to deadsoulja

+2 votes     reply to comment
Darkness
Darkness Apr 19 2003, 1:31am says:

UT UT UT!!! :P

+2 votes     reply to comment
Dragonlord
Dragonlord Apr 19 2003, 8:09am says:

Quake1 was a great engine (that's why hl based on it). It was easy to use and an interesting engine.
Quake2 is also not bad but lacks on some points. Good to mod because Q2 is where the Action Mod (now AHL) has been coming from ( 8) )
Quake3 i'm not really fond of. The whole animation thingy is crap but the skin designing system is interesting.
UT you can crap too. It just forces you too much into UT like style and besides this... using a Script Language to code pure Windows Function Procedures in Scripting is just like a fist on the eye (:sick:).
UT2k3 i'm not fond of too. To much bloat, too much useless features and the Scripting faults they made in UT they took over instead of correcting them. The good thing, great graphics if you are willing to buy you a pc fast enough (i'm not). Other good point that the phisycal system althouh in MP you will never need it nor recognize it but brings down your FPS. Nice trick with vehicals too for people who like it (me not). To mod it's a bit better than ut but no match with Quake related engines (like HL).

+2 votes     reply to comment
Chandler
Chandler Apr 19 2003, 10:43am says:

Strange... I can't vote in this poll, although I haven't yet voted.

+2 votes     reply to comment
hammy-bob
hammy-bob Apr 19 2003, 2:08pm says:

its cause you voted on the public enemy one

+2 votes     reply to comment
GAMESOULjA
GAMESOULjA Apr 19 2003, 2:57pm says:

Dragonlord is biased.

+2 votes     reply to comment
hammy-bob
hammy-bob Apr 19 2003, 5:25pm says:

:D q1!!!!!! its the best im telling you!!

+2 votes     reply to comment
BlueWolf72
BlueWolf72 Apr 19 2003, 6:17pm says:

who is deleting polls that just went up... HOW RUDE!

+2 votes     reply to comment
Dragonlord
Dragonlord Apr 19 2003, 7:12pm says:

Hm... what you mean with biased?

+2 votes     reply to comment
INtense!
INtense! Apr 19 2003, 9:37pm says:

I deleted the poll... didn't really think it was appropiate to have a poll on one modification, need to give all mods a fair go :D

+2 votes     reply to comment
GAMESOULjA
GAMESOULjA Apr 19 2003, 10:06pm says:

how old are u? -_-

+2 votes     reply to comment
Shrimp
Shrimp Apr 20 2003, 2:44am says:

From my experiance, the Unreal engine's UnrealScript makes it by far one of the most versitile and easy to modify engines around.

Just stay away from the GUI stuff :D

+2 votes     reply to comment
ShortCutMan
ShortCutMan Apr 20 2003, 7:03am says:

UT. You don't need to have a DLL complier. And you can even add iin DLL's if you want too!

+2 votes     reply to comment
Dragonlord
Dragonlord Apr 20 2003, 9:00am says:

1) I'm 22
2) UnrealScript is ugly. It's everything else but crossplatform and that's the main reason you do a Scripting Language. Or you want to keep people off direct memory access (kinda VM) but in that way US failed too. It's just a useless scripting language (:sick:).
That's why I'm doing my own Scripting Language to get past those ugly flaws (and to have a useful SL).

+2 votes     reply to comment
BaD-cOmPaNy
BaD-cOmPaNy Apr 20 2003, 9:06am says:

UNREAL2K3 TILL I DIE!

+2 votes     reply to comment
hammy-bob
hammy-bob Apr 20 2003, 3:22pm says:

Quake is by far the easiest to code i just started learning quake coding i already made a couple things (ut scrpiting makes no sense to me)

+2 votes     reply to comment
NuKeR
NuKeR Apr 20 2003, 6:21pm says:

UT2003.

Just a note : It doesnt ask what engine is the easiest, they ask "is the best" so Unreal Tournament 2003 is the best engine out there, with the karma engine and fabulous lighting possibilities

+2 votes     reply to comment
NuKeR
NuKeR Apr 20 2003, 6:22pm says:

Oh, and you also need to think about mapping, not only coding. UT2003's editor is one of the easiest to work with, since you can pull off a map in 5-10 hours

+2 votes     reply to comment
Dragonlord
Dragonlord Apr 20 2003, 7:10pm says:

And one of the most unstable... The editor with the most crashes I ever saw, the most bloated GUI. I never saw a bigger mess like that.
Lightning effects? The first I turned off... they didn't impress me but only lowered brutally my fps... switch off what you never will need and isn't thaaaat impressive.
Make the gameplay, animations and that stupid model format better and then, only then you can come with graphics, not before (BTW the biggest disease in todays games... *sigh*).

+2 votes     reply to comment
UberSoldat
UberSoldat Apr 20 2003, 10:44pm says:

I like ut2k3. Well come on. all of those useless features are for use of to the mods. It gives you more freedom of what you want to do.

+2 votes     reply to comment
CLuver?
CLuver? Apr 20 2003, 11:03pm says:

BF1942! Look what the guys over at Desert Combat have produced, only a few months after the release of the game. Bloody amazing. It wipes the floor with every other mod on earth in terms of what it's done (excluding NS :D)

+2 votes     reply to comment
hammy-bob
hammy-bob Apr 20 2003, 11:17pm says:

man quake mapping is easy to i could make a map for quake in like 5-10 minutes haha!

+2 votes     reply to comment
BigBird
BigBird Apr 21 2003, 2:57am says:

although halflife is of the quake one engine, it has been heavily modified, so would that not entitle it to be an engine in its own right?

+2 votes     reply to comment
Dragonlord
Dragonlord Apr 21 2003, 8:08am says:

Half-Life is more than an exstension. It has completle be rewritten and enhanced with sierra internal ideas. BTW: all that useless features you think are usefull for moders, i can tell you that you can do them with almost any engine out there. you thought this is done by the engine? nope, sorry. it's all done by the actor and item code. the engine can only delivere an event to make things a bit easier but the effect doesn't come out of the engine. and thus makes us able to do it on other engines too.

+2 votes     reply to comment
bart2o
bart2o Apr 21 2003, 8:10am says:

best engine is quake1 because it is very easy to modify (sorry for my english)

+2 votes     reply to comment
Maldita_Vecindad
Maldita_Vecindad Apr 21 2003, 10:26am says:

"By Dragonlord
Date Mon 21st, Apr 2003 @ 7:08:38am

Half-Life is more than an exstension. It has completle be rewritten and enhanced with sierra internal ideas. " Since when Sierra codes?....Sry but I though Valve were the ones behing the Halflife engine coding...

For me the best engine for modding would be UT2003 cause it has great tools for modding. Also Epic support to modding is one of the best ever. They are even planning on making a Modding Contest. Soon we'll see many great mods for this engine. In fact no other engine has been able to produce such quality work that fast.

Q3 modding comes second cause franky..no other engine can breed mods so extremely so diferent from the original version like the good old Q3.

Battlefield engine mods seem great but until we see a serious comitment to modding teams from the developers...it will come on 3rd place.(and Im not talking about that greedy finantial "want to make you retail" EA kind of interest)

+2 votes     reply to comment
Dragonlord
Dragonlord Apr 21 2003, 3:26pm says:

By Maldita_Vecindad:
Since when Sierra codes?....Sry but I though Valve were the ones behing the Halflife engine coding...

Damn it! Read first! I talked about Sierra's own ideas not that they coded those ideas!! :rolleyes:

+2 votes     reply to comment
<*)_><
<*)_>< Apr 21 2003, 4:06pm says:

@Dragonlord
"Make the gameplay, animations and that stupid model format better and then"

Gameplay and animations?
Well sounds like perfect modding material then :)

+2 votes     reply to comment
Sajt
Sajt Apr 21 2003, 4:27pm says:

Quake 1 is the best engine to mod for a variety of reasons. First of all, the language that comes with it, QuakeC, is very powerful and easy to use. It has certain drawbacks, such as the inability to modify things like HUDs and menus, but QuakeC is better than DLL coding because it's so easy to read and write, and it's cross-platform.
Second of all, Quake1's engine source has been GPLed! Thanks to this, as well as some very genius coders, many enhanced engine modifications have been released. Tenebrae is pretty but an outcast, Darkplaces is all the rage. Many of these engines have the ability to compete with all sorts of games on the market today.
Thirdly the Quake community has been whittled down to only the elite. Ever since Quake II's release in 1997, modders have been leaving Quake 1 to go to these newer games. All the while since then, many others have been coming and going. Now, the Quake community is small, but some of them could code the pants off UT2k3 modders and the like. Plus they generally have seven years of experience with the Quake engine, and a lot can happen in that time period.
With the Quake engine, as I am doing with Fniggium, it is possible to create a whole new game, not a mod, without spending a penny. We can modify everything down to the menus, and even add new model and map formats. Is there a bug or annoying limitation in the engine? Who cares, why don't we fix it or improve it. We can also readily add new capabilities to QuakeC with ease.

If you read this post and say something along the lines of 'Oh, but UT2k3 can do ____, and Quake can't'... Well, you'll regret saying that, because someone might just come along and add that feature to Quake.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Croftanator
Croftanator Apr 22 2003, 9:39am says:

Half Life 2 :thumbup:

+2 votes     reply to comment
Dragonlord
Dragonlord Apr 22 2003, 11:14am says:

Really good points PANTS.
I just saw the screenies of some mod on the news page using ut2k3. I agree that those bushes, grass and WTF ever is extremly nice but... Do you need an engine like ut2k3 for that? Nope. All that has been done there are billboards (a horrible lot of them). Billboarding is far one of the most old techniques you can think off (doom and co had them the first and all the game was made with it). It depends on the amount of billboards you plant in the world and wow... look at that... a quake based game would look alike... but with resource consumptions you would go mad of excitement and... 0$.
BTW... why will you never see code of UT2k3 or UT? Because the code is awefull! Have you ever seen this nice Assertion Errors during startup? Yeah? You know what that is? Debugging code!! Assertions are used for (poor) debugging and should never ever be visible nor occure in a finished app because Assertions mean 'brutal, unrecoverable error' and a release app should cath'em. And BTW you can see in those error messages a little bit of their dev-tree and this one is horrible... it's even worse than windows and linux code together!
I would never ever code with an engine under my *** beeing coded so miserable. I would take Quake because this one was made with brains not with $$$.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Guest
Guest Apr 23 2003, 7:18am says:

This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.

Dragonlord
Dragonlord Apr 23 2003, 11:05am says:

Todays engines shall break limits? I'm laughing out loudly!
There's nothing a older game engine couldn't do compared to UT2k3 engine. I saw no engine out there today which impressed me... none (that's why i'm doing it myself, so I get an engine which has what I want and need)!
> You say that graphics, physics 'n' stuff are not necessary. The only thing is a good coding.
Not quite correct. Coding is essential to make a game working (I saw horrible crashes, problems and so on, with UT, UT2k3 and HL). It's true, I'm a hard-coder and I'm interested also very much in the way engines are made but that's not the important point. Good Graphics and Physics are ranking very low in my list of what a game needs to become a good game. All that stuff that people send into battle as arguments for todays engines don't impress me because graphics, sound, models, all that stuff does not depend on the engine. You can make the same super graphics on quake so there's no point in it for me to favorate a bloated engine which doesn't really delivers more.
So my point is clear:
Why shall I use a bloated engine and get lots of troubles when I can have/make a free, fast, and easy to use older/selfmade engine which I can modify to look like the new ones and that just works without making troubles.

+2 votes     reply to comment
leilei
leilei Apr 23 2003, 11:38am says:

Hehe, DragonLord is funny, he's probably never bought any Unreal powered game :P

Q1 all the way, easy to code, and if you complain about the graphics at one point we (I) have you backed up.
Moddb.com

+2 votes     reply to comment
INtense!
INtense! Apr 23 2003, 12:19pm says:

interesting discussion... you had numerous bad experiences with UT2k3 i presume 'Dragonlord'

I was thinking of adding HL to this poll, but a). i didn't think it is deserved since it aint really an original engine and b). everyone would just select it, so i wanted to see what other engines would get a good run :D

prolly should have added Doom 2, tons of nice mods for it... damn mate of mine forces me to admire them all the time :)

+2 votes     reply to comment
NuKeR
NuKeR Apr 23 2003, 1:58pm says:

"And one of the most unstable... The editor with the most crashes I ever saw"

Let me guess :

You're on Win98/ME. 98/ME arent supported by UED3.0. Only NT based OSs are fully supported. I never crashed one single time.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Guest
Guest Apr 23 2003, 2:00pm says:

This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.

leilei
leilei Apr 23 2003, 2:30pm says:

UnrealEd3 works on Win98SE for me.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Dragonlord
Dragonlord Apr 23 2003, 3:13pm says:

I haven't said that my engine is better than others. it's my first one so don't expect a miracle (everybody starts small) and i'm not into competing with the big ones. i wanna achive some special goals that i didn't found this way in other engines. the reason for doing this is the challange and fun, fun, fun :D.

about that winme/98 thingy... yeah, i have a win98 amongst my systems. although fortunatly the troubles have been less the last time i used the editor to view a model (god damn will i be happy as soon as that gme get's finished, then i can drop that shït) i'm not very happy. i once stumbled across some editor field in it but since then i never found it again... haha... an editor you don't find a feature again even with rtfm is just a joke.

But i guess this topic starts to stagnate. i've my opinion and you have yours. it's like c++ vs delphi, it ends in a stationary war in the end.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Guest
Guest Apr 23 2003, 3:48pm says:

This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.

Oddj0b
Oddj0b Apr 23 2003, 5:06pm says:

Yehaa, ut2k3 go for it

+2 votes     reply to comment
Chandler
Chandler Apr 23 2003, 9:53pm says:
Guest wrote:I DO NOT think that your engine is better than all the other engines out there.

How can anyone make a sound judgment without even knowing what they're judging?

+2 votes     reply to comment
Guest
Guest Apr 24 2003, 10:56am says:

This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.

neXus
neXus Apr 24 2003, 11:58am says:
Quote:How can anyone make a sound judgment without even knowing what they're judging?

That sentence of mine does not mean that Dragonlord's engine is worse than the others, as well :)
It only means that every engine has good and bad sites. So the discussion about the best programmable engine should be done by real hard core coders ;)

+2 votes     reply to comment
Guest
Guest Apr 24 2003, 10:55pm says:

This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.

Xenoshock
Xenoshock May 2 2010, 10:57am says:

you forgot source :O:O:O:O

+2 votes     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only