The reapers have returned from dark space. With Earth under attack and the mass relays in a state of chaos from refugees and the councils fleet engaging reaper forces the galaxy is a mess. The outcome is unknown, the warfare is devastating. The galaxy will never be the same.

Add media Report RSS Cerberus C.A.R.E. Package cannon Concept Poll (view original)
Cerberus C.A.R.E. Package cannon Concept Poll
embed
share
view previous
Share Image
Share on Facebook Post Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments  (0 - 50 of 127)
Vadernator
Vadernator - - 264 comments

#2 is my favorite. I like symmetry and #1 seems a bit to short for a weapon of mass destruction. That's just my opinion.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
TriggerHappyMan
TriggerHappyMan - - 43 comments

Well the longer barrel would not be needed in space. So would be more cost effective. Though one could argue that you have multiple C.A.R.E. Packages stacked up ready to go, or something else along some other line. Honestly do not really care what one he picks; they all have something I like about them.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Vadernator
Vadernator - - 264 comments

Yeah, I wouldn't complain whichever one he chooses.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
wargames01
wargames01 - - 119 comments

3 and 2 look like hammers!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Glorious_Leader
Glorious_Leader - - 7 comments

It would be cool if it was animated, so when it's readying up to fire the barrel could extend.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Guest
Guest - - 690,250 comments

This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.

Lockerd
Lockerd - - 2,044 comments

#3 for me.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+8 votes
Rallehop
Rallehop - - 262 comments

i would say number 3, the way that the ''wings?'' are only on 1 side really touches me, makes it look like theres actually a bridge or something.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Fireball24
Fireball24 - - 107 comments

I think 2 is good

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
KhevaKins
KhevaKins - - 271 comments

Well number 1 is the scariest looking but I vote 2. I like the telescopic look.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Doshka17
Doshka17 - - 144 comments

Number 1. It's not about size, it's about how you use it.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+27 votes
Wolfrahm Author
Wolfrahm - - 339 comments

Exactly. And besides, I think it looks like a massive inter-system shotgun.

Reply Good karma+7 votes
Doshka17
Doshka17 - - 144 comments

Must suck to be the crew stationed inside this thing though.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+11 votes
LoftySgtTaylor
LoftySgtTaylor - - 344 comments

same, i say 1, the size is just right, and the two wings don't look awkwardly placed, 3 now looks unbalanced, same with the barrel of 2 and 3, they just are too long in my opinion and would be more like a prop for a slap stick comedy in space.

loftysgttaylor votes 1

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
LoftySgtTaylor
LoftySgtTaylor - - 344 comments

forgot to add and asymmetrical like 3

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
MooCowBanshee
MooCowBanshee - - 621 comments

I gotta agree with ya, number one got my eye. Size ain't everything. (Don't tell your girlfriend that)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+9 votes
Shockmatter
Shockmatter - - 1,005 comments

I know I wasn't the only one who had a dirty thought about this.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Hawky_Helldiver
Hawky_Helldiver - - 60 comments

I like #2

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
liberty_wings
liberty_wings - - 925 comments

Number 2#

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
Plejadenwolf
Plejadenwolf - - 520 comments

I can't decide between 1 and 2. 2 looks great because it's some kind of a monumental superweapon but 1 looks more like a badass and compact space station. The asymmetrical concept 3 doesn't fit in my opinion. Hard to answer without texture... Well, because 2 looks way more sleek and similar to the mass relays I say 2.

In the past I had an idea for a superweapon of the Synthesis splinter group of Cerberus which I called the "Lakunae-project". Lacuna means gap which does really fit to Synthesis, the gap which techno-reaper-organics or a new humanity fills up. This project is some kind of a super-mass-accelerator with at least 4 mass relay rings, built in an asteroid laboratory near the Charon portal were even the Alliance didn't notice Cerberus. It's a mixture between Reaper tech and the very best of human resources and research. Designwise a mixture between the Crucible (but Cerberus-like), some mass relays and probably some asteroid parts with antennae. It is able to accelerate ships, projectiles and itself which makes it a mobile superweapon. Maybe overpowered but it could even just be a mobile mass relay... Just wanted to share the idea with you guys being some suggestive thoughts on that side.
The concepts shown here are much better as the beginning concept. Great work and keep it up!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Null12
Null12 - - 111 comments

Personally, I like number three. It makes sense that a massive super weapon of that size would need to have a command and control center, hence the little section jutting out on the side. And quite frankly, never been a huge fan of perfect symmetry with military constructions. There are always small bits that 'stick out', and I like it.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
sirnutty
sirnutty - - 41 comments

honestly,maybe somewhere between 1 and 2. The barrel looks far too long in number 2 (and 3), but far too short in number 1. I think a combination of them all - a command control center on one side and a barrel not a long as 2 but longer than 1

Reply Good karma Bad karma+6 votes
Plejadenwolf
Plejadenwolf - - 520 comments

Yeah, I agree with that. Just take the best parts of the three concepts and merge it into an uber-concept. No but seriously, I just thought the same. The command tower of 3 looks awesome as does the overall structure of 1. In 2 and 3 the barrel is just a little bit to long or should be added with some details (some plates as in the short barrel of 1 for example). In 1 the barrel looks awesome but, yeah, it's to short to look like a superweapon.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
hRDLA
hRDLA - - 28 comments

Number 1
It's not about size, you need firepower too.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
S3TH
S3TH - - 263 comments

it is a mass accelerator!
So size matters ;)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
S3TH
S3TH - - 263 comments

Definitely #2
#1 is too short
#2 is unbalanced (so what I don't like ^^)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Neon-Ghost
Neon-Ghost - - 1,605 comments

3.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Noodlees
Noodlees - - 120 comments

1

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
dds95555
dds95555 - - 172 comments

2

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
VVVVBBBB
VVVVBBBB - - 140 comments

2

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
giggles616
giggles616 - - 20 comments

I think number 3 for super weapon, but I do think a combination of 1's hull and 3's side module would be very cool. I also think that 1 could looks cool as a smaller defense gun, it just lacks the same sense of scale as the other concepts.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
olaf333
olaf333 - - 6 comments

#2 for me, but it is also good 3

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Capt.Keyes
Capt.Keyes - - 518 comments

I like #3.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
880Zero
880Zero - - 2,557 comments

The barrels on two and three are just too long, I much prefer number one because its compact and flows with the design aesthetic. With the other two, all the detail is in the back and theres nothing on the barrel to contrast the design so its just freely hanging out there. On number one, however, its still out there but the barrel isn't subtracting anything from the design and allows the concept to flow from high contrast at the back to a funneled low contrast point on the front.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+5 votes
Wolfrahm Author
Wolfrahm - - 339 comments

When Skylin5gtr models and textures the CARE package cannon ,If either design 2 or 3 is chosen, he'll probably add detail to the barrel, like power conduits, heat disposal panels and the like. Also I didn't do any texturing because texturing on Sketchup is a pain in the *** (and unnecessary for a simple concept), especially on irregular surfaces like the barrel. I personally would prefer either concept 1 or 3.

Reply Good karma-1 votes
skyline5gtr Creator
skyline5gtr - - 392 comments

maybe a 1-2 mix it looks like

Reply Good karma+5 votes
ZashoN
ZashoN - - 16 comments

3

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
IronXZ
IronXZ - - 73 comments

#2 is the best for me

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
KaptenHaddock
KaptenHaddock - - 169 comments

#1 with #3's wings, and a bit longer.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
raiu50
raiu50 - - 5 comments

I like #3 more

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
tt0022
tt0022 - - 666 comments

#1 looks cool but it could be a bit longer.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Urbna
Urbna - - 12 comments

#1 Or a mix betweed 1 and 2. The barrels on 2 and 3 are way too long.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Gul-Dukat(tech)
Gul-Dukat(tech) - - 1,810 comments

3

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
lordrew
lordrew - - 13 comments

1

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
danielob13
danielob13 - - 1 comments

2

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
MrPerson
MrPerson - - 1,801 comments

2

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Vegas
Vegas - - 103 comments

1

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
AceBuck1
AceBuck1 - - 3 comments

1 looks best in my opinion

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Wolfrahm Author
Wolfrahm - - 339 comments

Okay, I'm making my vote then: 1 mixed with 3, but mainly 1.
Total so far:
Concept 1: 13
Concept 2: 14
Concept 3: 12
(Mod members have two votes, except for me).

Ooh so tight. tell me if I miscounted.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account:

Description

These are the three final designs of the C.A.R.E. Package cannon. Go ahead and state which design is your favourite, and if you wish also state why you prefer that design. As you may notice, Concept 1 has a shortened barrel, Concept 2 is the standard concept and Concept 3 is the asymmetrical version of the concept. Please don't state your favourite concept more than once, as I'll be checking which concept gets the most support. I've set up an actual poll on the forums if you'd prefer to vote there (or both).