Which graphics is better L.U.R.K. 1.1 or L.U.R.K. 1.05? Thread - L.U.R.K. mod for S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Shadow of Chernobyl
The L.U.R.K. team wants to provide the best possible experience from Stalker: Shadow of Chernobyl, we don't plan to skew the scope of this game, because I, like many others, fell in love with the game because of the story, the realistic gameplay, and the atmosphere. I plan to preserve and improve on that concept to the best of my abilities, and our team has vowed to do so as well. Which is why we took it upon ourselves to provide that experience. We want to fulfill a niche that's otherwise unfulfilled in the modding community. We want to bring as many features to Stalker without damaging or changing the original theme of the game. While improving upon that concept with features that were dropped off the development cycle from GSC, such as stealth AI, and a strong foundation for balance, as well as dynamic A-Life, and an unprecedented visual presentation that no other Stalker Overhaul can touch.
| Posts | ||
|---|---|---|
| Which graphics is better L.U.R.K. 1.1 or L.U.R.K. 1.05? | Locked | |
| Thread Options | ||
| Sep 29 2010 Anchor | ||
|
Content of L.U.R.K. RC 1.05 decompressed from the archive takes about 3.4 GB whereas that of L.U.R.K. 1.1 only about 1.8 GB of space. Which of them is better. Logically a newer version must brings in some improvment but actually what we see is a decrease in the texture folder volume. I am at loss. Furthermore : there is a folder in L.U.R.K._RC_1.05_Full named "High Level Grass Density" whereas in L.U.R.K. 1.1 there is no such a folder. So, one cannot come to conclusion which of the versions has the better graphics? Beforehand I am grateful to any one for answeres. Edited by: Truchmann |
||
| Oct 14 2010 Anchor | ||
|
Performance wise the 1.05 So far that is all I can tell about it. |
||
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.