Lost Alpha is a new episode of the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. series made by dezowave group for free!

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Media RSS Feed Report media S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Lost Alpha (view original)
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Lost Alpha
embed
share
view previous next
 
Post comment Comments
jman94
jman94 Apr 27 2014, 5:47am says:

I will never get tired of X-Ray's lighting engine. Absolutely beautiful.

+21 votes     reply to comment
id.Dav
id.Dav Apr 27 2014, 5:54am says:

Doth versions are absolutely awesome! Great Great Great!

+7 votes     reply to comment
TARCZYN
TARCZYN Apr 27 2014, 5:57am says:

Great job dezowave

+4 votes     reply to comment
Stiven999
Stiven999 Apr 27 2014, 6:01am says:

OHH MYY

+3 votes     reply to comment
Streloker
Streloker Apr 27 2014, 6:02am says:

Xray engine is best engine for me

+2 votes     reply to comment
notecx
notecx Apr 27 2014, 6:22am says:

"A little bit" more grass on r1, heh. :)

+4 votes     reply to comment
phillon
phillon Apr 27 2014, 6:49am says:

Awesome hey! Massive difference, shows just how good the engine is.

+2 votes     reply to comment
chiffmonkey
chiffmonkey Apr 27 2014, 7:01am says:

Stalker has this weird ability to look *real years after release.

+5 votes     reply to comment
Raatokalle
Raatokalle Apr 27 2014, 8:08am says:

in my opinion, both of em look great in their own way.

+1 vote     reply to comment
silwerbullet
silwerbullet Apr 27 2014, 10:49am says:

r1 render looks scary as hell.

+2 votes     reply to comment
dezodor Creator
dezodor Apr 27 2014, 10:54am replied:

i still like it, looks grimm

+6 votes   reply to comment
id.Dav
id.Dav Apr 27 2014, 5:22pm says:

Well no doubt that with R1 render Lost Alpha is the most atmospheric Stalker version ever existed)))

+3 votes     reply to comment
Expack
Expack Apr 28 2014, 8:39am says:

Very nice indeed - quite the radical difference. However, I'd be curious to see a comparison between the R2 and R3 renderers to see how much of a difference there is.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Rus[T]
Rus[T] Apr 28 2014, 1:02pm replied:

Yup, also would want a comparison side-by-side of R1, R2 & R3.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Chaaaaaaaalie
Chaaaaaaaalie Apr 28 2014, 2:25pm says:

How do you switch between r1, r2 and r3?

+4 votes     reply to comment
Chaaaaaaaalie
Chaaaaaaaalie Apr 29 2014, 12:21am replied:

Is this just static lighting vs. dynamic? Or is it something else?

+1 vote     reply to comment
milosv
milosv Apr 29 2014, 4:37pm says:

r3 for me has shadows that are too dark, or contrast is, my eyes hurt sometimes

+1 vote     reply to comment
HunterKiller1
HunterKiller1 May 7 2014, 7:49am says:

I've posted some screens, via Steam and lots of people tell me they look almost real. :)

+1 vote     reply to comment
Strogglet15
Strogglet15 May 7 2014, 2:59pm says:

Remember when they were trying to make STALKER 2? They changed their XRay engine to the Crytek 2 or something. That's horrible! The XRay is a lot better, especially for "dark" games.

+1 vote     reply to comment
boredgunner
boredgunner May 10 2014, 9:47pm says:

R2 for the win, because R3 can't have anti-aliasing while R2 works with both MSAA and SSAA (though I get artifacts when forcing either of them). I beg you to add an in-game supersampling and multisampling implementation for R2.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Description

Some fresh media from the dev team.

Image Details
Type
Promotional
Date
Apr 27th, 2014
By
TKAzA
Size
1680×2100
Options
URL
Embed (big)
Embed
Share
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only