A real-time strategy game where you design airships and then fight with them. The aim is to have pretty chaotic explodey fights and interesting ship design choices.

Purchase includes future versions up to 1.0!

At its core, the game is about designing airships and fighting with them. Ships are put together out of modules, and the layout of modules matters a great deal: everything on board is done by individual airsailors who need to run around, ferrying coal, ammunition, water and repair tools - and sometimes their fallen comrades.

You can command fleets of airships both against the computer and against other players across the Internet.

In addition, there is a single-player strategic mode, where you use your fleet to conquer city after city, unlocking new modules and bonuses with each of them.

The game has an authentic-ish system of heraldry where you can create your own coat of arms, and register it with the game forums as unique to you.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Post article RSS Articles

I like writing about bugs in Airships. I don't want to present myself as some infallible rock-star Indie developer, because I'm anything but. Airships is a game for builders and tinkerers, and I have seen again and again that you like reading about its creation, warts and all.

So today we delve into The Mystery of HMS Longcat.

I was alerted to a weird bug by several users: their very largest airships would fail to reload their cannons. The first salvo would fire just fine, but new ammunition would never arrive, despite plenty of crew and ammo stores.

One user helpfully supplied me with a ship design where this was happening. As an aside, this is basically the perfect setup for me to quickly diagnose and fix a problem:

  • Tell me what you expect to happen: the cannon should be reloaded.
  • Tell me what actually happens: the cannon does not get reloaded.
  • Give me a simple and reliable way to see the problem for myself: a ship design where this reliably happens every time.

So I was able to load up that design, the Pale Mare 2, and see for myself what was going wrong.

And indeed, after the initial salvo, crew members started walking to get ammo, only to stop and return to their posts, over and over again.

Once a problem can be reproduced reliably, the next step is to try and reproduce it in as simple a way as possible. The Pale Mare 2 was a huge ship. It would be hard to pick out the exact problem from all the activity going on in the ship.

The working hypothesis was that this problem only happened in very long ships, so I constructed the HMS Longcat:

This ridiculous design was much simpler but still as long as the Pale Mare 2. If the problem appeared here too, it was likely that length was the actual culprit. If it did not happen, perhaps it was related to the overall size of the ship instead.

And indeed, it happened again.

Next, I rebuilt the HMS Longcat into the HMS Shortcat, a ship with essentially the same modules, but more compact.

And behold, the problem went away! Crew started fetching ammunition perfectly reliably.

There was one last thing to test before I started digging into the code: was the problem related to the overall length of the ship, or to the length of the part of the ship actually accessible to the crew? Given that the problem could be related to pathing, maybe the pathing failed if the crew-accessible area was too big?

This resulted in the HMS Shortcat with a Tail:

And the problem was back! Simply attaching a long line of struts to a ship caused the bug to reappear.

It was time to put in some logging.

I started logging cases where a crewman abandoned a task for any reason, to see if I could catch them abandoning the ammo-fetching. And indeed, the log rapidly filled up with messages that crew kept on abandoning ammo jobs.

I improved the logging to indicate the reason why a task was abandoned, and it told me that the ammo fetching got abandoned because there was another, much more important task to be done.

So I homed in on that case and added logging to indicate the nature of these more important tasks, and the relative priority values of the old task and its replacement.

Now these priority values are meant to be roughly between 0 and 1. A task with priority 1.0 is super-important and must be done immediately, while one with a priority less that 0.1 is something an air sailor can do if there's nothing else to do. Which is why I knew things had gone a little wrong when I got the following log message:

AmmoJob (priority -0.81) replaced by ReadyJob (priority 0.0000003).

Negative priorities were... not meant to be a thing. So the crewman was sent out to fetch ammo, but the next time the ship re-evaluated crew assignments, it would see that there was a much more important job for him to do: stand around at the ready in case something needed doing.

The ship would then promptly re-assign the ammo job to the crewman, and the cycle would start anew.

Next stop: the code for calculating the AmmoJob's priority, where I discovered the culprit, a single-letter typo:

return staffJobPriority(ship, self, type, x);

The staffJobPriority function calculates the appropriate priority for a normal job, such as fetching ammo. It's meant to be given the following information:

  • ship, the ship the job is in
  • self, the module it's for
  • type, the module's type
  • n, the number of the job

Here, instead of n, it was given x. In this context, x is the x-coordinate of the module in the ship's grid.

So what is the job number meant to be for? A module can have multiple jobs of the same type - two people to fetch ammo at the same time, or many people to put out fires or repair it. To break ties, each job beyond the first has a slightly lower priority.

Based on the job number, the priority is calculated as follows:

0.7 - n * 0.01;

So the first AmmoJob is meant to have a priority of 0.69, the second 0.68, and so on.

But the code passed in x instead of n. Which meant that the further to the right of the ship a weapon was, the less important was its AmmoJob. And on very long ships like the Pale Mare 2, where x was greater than 70, the resulting priority became negative.

And indeed, upon fixing that line to read

return staffJobPriority(ship, self, type, n);

everything started working just fine!

What's more, I found the same typo in the priority calculation for supplying coal to modules. It had lain there undetected simply because coal-using modules tend to be at the back of the ship, where the x-values are low enough to keep the priorities positive.

In the end, a very unlikely-sounding problem was all due to some bad cross-wiring of values. Careful investigation yielded results, and the problem will be gone in the next update.

GUI Scaling

GUI Scaling


I'm working towards a variable-size user interface.

Pirate Flags

Pirate Flags


"Pirates have their own crude tradition of flags and symbols."

The Monster Update

The Monster Update

News 3 comments

The next major release of Airships is done! Headline features include monsters like dragons and giant spiders, new music, and player-created combat scenarios...

Automated Heraldry: Merging Coats of Arms

Automated Heraldry: Merging Coats of Arms

News 2 comments

One of the new features coming in Airships dev 9 is the ability for empires to join into alliances if they're feeling threatened. But what coat of arms...

Add file RSS Related Files
PsyPsyche Designs v2.00

PsyPsyche Designs v2.00

PsyPsyche Designs Full Version

PsyPsyche Designs Version 2.00 | Airships 1472 (+20) | Landships 264 (+21) | Buildings 275 (+133) | Missions: Arena Levels 01-05 | ConstructionAffinities...

The Free Kit v1.04

The Free Kit v1.04

The Free Kit Full Version

The Free Kit v1.04 | A:CTS v9.0.3 | Free Modules | Free Armour | Bonus Modules | No Maintenance Costs | No Bonus Restrictions | v1.04 General update...

Conquer The Future v0.03 Pre-Alpha

Conquer The Future v0.03 Pre-Alpha

Conquer The Future Demo

Conquer The Future v0.03 Pre-Alpha doesn't add much, well, other than; Balanced Audio, Laser Cannon, Auto Cannon, Plasma Cannon, Satellite Communications...

Conquer The Future v0.01 Pre-Alpha [OLD]

Conquer The Future v0.01 Pre-Alpha [OLD]

Conquer The Future Demo

The future has finally arrived. Conquer The Future v0.01 Pre-Alpha doesn't provide much, but enough to take a look; including Audio, Visual, Photoshopual...

PsyPsyche Designs v1.99 [OLD]

PsyPsyche Designs v1.99 [OLD]

PsyPsyche Designs Full Version

PsyPsyche Designs Version 1.99 | Airships 290 | Landships 43 | Buildings 204

The Module Kit v005 Alpha | 1x1 - 1x3

The Module Kit v005 Alpha | 1x1 - 1x3

The Module Kit Demo

The Module Kit for Airships: Conquer The Skies. | Alpha Demo contains 1x1 through 3x1 module iterations. || v005 - Updated Categories, removed ConstructionAffinity...

Comments  (0 - 10 of 62)

This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.


This comment is currently awaiting admin approval, join now to view.


Great game

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes

I did a Let's Play/First impressions on this game! Come check it out if ya like!
Big thanks to the developer for this great game!
Hope you enjoy.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes

Wow! what a nice and original idea. Looks very fun! follow! =D

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes

Looks like a whole lot of fun...and chaos. Definitely tracking this!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes

Great idea - keeping an eye on this :)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote

I love this game soooo much! HAHAHAH!


Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes

Are you planning on adding a map for Multiplayer? I have friends getting the game. Although it looks like they are waiting for another option besides paypal to pay with. .

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Zarkonnen Creator

The issue with making a MP map is that combats and strategy work at different timescales, so you'd spend a lot of time waiting for other peoples' fights. Not sure how to fix that.

Re: PayPal - what kind of payment method would they like? I totally understand that it's not exactly everyone's first choice. Am up for anything, including stuffing money into an envelope. :P

Reply Good karma+5 votes
Post a comment
Sign in or join with:

Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.

Follow Report Profile
Airships: Conquer the Skies
Windows, Mac, Linux
Send Message
Release date
Game watch
Community Rating



22 votes submitted.

You Say


Ratings closed.

Highest Rated (2 agree) 10/10

Great game. I've been playing since Dev2 and it gets better each time. It's a steal for only $5. Reminds me of the Total War games with it's campaign map.

Apr 24 2014 by CanofSodaGames


Latest tweets from @zarkonnen_com

I just discovered the magic of Store.steampowered.com - very useful for filtering out stuff you don't want! #gaming

5hours ago

RT @AlaynaMCole: Two #ResistJam workshops are now available! ✍️Learn the fundamentals of Twine.

6hours ago

RT @Quinnae_Moon: A vital counterpoint to what I just said, and it gives me pause. I see this now, and I'm sorry if I furthered it. T.co

21hours ago

Dear followers, what are the dimensions of an average burrito? I need this for science, er @relativebot

Feb 22 2017

RT @Worthless_Bums: "SUSPECTS." T.co

Feb 22 2017

Embed Buttons
Link to Airships: Conquer the Skies by selecting a button and using the embed code provided more...
Airships: Conquer the Skies
Last Update
365 members
You may also like
Rise of Legends
Rise of Legends Real Time Strategy
Black & White 2
Black & White 2 Real Time Strategy
SpellForce 2: Shadow Wars
SpellForce 2: Shadow Wars Real Time Strategy
Battle Realms
Battle Realms Real Time Strategy
Age of Mythology: The Titans
Age of Mythology: The Titans Real Time Strategy