Dawn of the Tiberium Age mod for C&C: Tiberian Sun

1. Primo that would feel alien to the original games, secundo the current combat is complicated as it is, tertio infantry is hardcoded to be turretless
2. That would needlessly make the situation on the battlefield less clear. DTA aims for vanilla games simplicity rather than overly elaborate graphical effects that make the situation unclear.
3...effect of firing from cruiser? Elaborate.
4. Primo, infantry cannot deploy or dig in. It's not RA2. Secundo, most artillery is already pinpoint precise and relies on mobility or burst damage, and the only artillery that could benefit from that is Allied Howitzer which is already very slow to turn and react and its ability would just needlessly complicate how the unit works.
5. Dune 2000 has unfitting graphics scheme and unmatching lore. RA2 and TS factions are just more advanced versions of current factions. Plus, 4 factions at the same time is already a huge burden to balance right.
6. DTA despite being based on TS engine completely disuses its terrain height mechanics because it aims simplicity and TD/RA1 feels. It's not going to get reversed.
7. That would feel really odd. Plus, why would a camouflaged tent give out blue light? Especially in the middle of nighttime operation? It would also largely negate effects of stealth generators. As of spotlights, then I personally could consider it, but for more competitive players it's nothing but sidebar clutter.
8. It's possible to capture neutral structures with engineers already. If you want garrisons in RA2 style - the engine doesn't support it.
9. We have them already and we are working on more.
10...move through scripts? Elaborate.

Disclaimer: What I'm talking about describes mainly Player Vs Player combat, around which most of the balance is focused, and Player Vs AI balance is secondary.

1. Allies
A) Gapgen unavailable, engine limitations.
B) Base defences are actually their strong point, their turrets just got a nerf because they were so damn powerful - Allied defences need no power to function, can chug up nukes and survive (and you cannot say the same about AGTs or tesla coils made of glass) plus they are really damn dirt cheap, you can plop them as a panic option whenever you want with no forward planning - pillbox can mush a commando and a wall of turrets is great alternative to tank group as a meathshield for artillery blobs that often support them.
C) Personally I gotta agree about cruisers - they aren't very strong, and you generally won't get much use out of them. They are somewhat handy best to poke at enemy units and make enemy do something about it over time or in groups to bombard multi-tile enemy structures, but otherwise they are cost-ineffective. If you want to destroy enemy bases efficiently, you are supposed to make amphibious landings with hovercrafts stuffed with tanks.
D) Allied arty is weak?! What?! It's dope! 600 credits per each, you can easily make entire battalions of those to eradicate infantry blobs before they even get close, counterbattery enemy arty, smash defences and even wither down enemy tanks, as long as they get Allied tanks or rocket infantry as close range support. Their real weakness is mediocrity as single units and bad mobility, but that's a little issue for Allies when they fight as a creeping fortress with blobs of units.

2. GDI
A) Medium tank - it's faster than heavies, if you can't fight them in enough numbers to secure a victory then retreat and get support or harass enemy harvesters.
B) Disc launcher - it's fairly expensive and vulnerable, but it used to be overpowered in large blobs. It's better as anti-tank weapon compared to V2 as well, though I also prefer V2 for its ruggedness and ability to win arty-to-arty fights.
C) A-10s are pride of GDI. They are not easy to use though, since they are made of glass - they rape anything and everything outside of AA cover, fry hordes of infantry, can incinerate EVERY SINGLE structure in the game, eliminate artillery blobs and can deal some frightening amount of damage to tanks. Probably only harvesters aren't great targets for those, but orcas can handle them.
But as I said - they are glass cannons, precise scalpels and not blunt hammers.
D) Carriers received the same treatment as cruisers, they are there to slowly wear down enemy and not turn bases to farmlands singlehandedly or in small groups. Their strength is ability to outrange and poke at anything with enough cover from other ships, but you are supposed to make amphibious landings to actually destroy bases efficiently.
E) GDI's commando serves different purpose than Nod's epic units - he is like A-10 a precise operations unit that can cause MASSIVE amount of damage to undefended bases but is easy to deter, so you use him to put pressure on enemy or exploit his unawareness.
F) XO powersuit can very easily outrun a cyborg and can cause more damage over time than Harbinger, plus unlike Nod's specials he has ability to damage multiple enemy tanks in a row with railgun, and can handle multiple weak vehicles much, much faster than the slow-firing plasmagun.

3. Nod
A) SSM works differently than other arties, it's less of raw damage dealer and much more of kiting units - you roll up near enemy non-artillery, you shoot them well outside their range, and you run, they are very fast for artillery and can outrange and out-shock MLRS.
Tanks can resist SSM, but over time the damage from multiple rocket launches will add up and get really obnoxious.
B) Light tank is kinda supposed to be mediocre - Nod is about trickery and they are well adapted to fighting not with the same thing but with different thing - their vehicles are bad against other vehicles, but they have 4 great antipersonel ones - a cheap speedster, a tanky splasher, a long-range kiter and a high-tech lightning bruiser. They are good at fighting tanks with their own infantry - rocket soldiers and chemical warriors can be rapidly unleashed from Stealth APCs to cause massive damage to enemy armor.
Otherwise you are supposed to destroy enemy economy with bikes and stealthies and overcome enemy with sheer numbers.

4. Soviets - they are the most newbie-friendly option since they are good in head-on combat and need little micromanagement. However, they are anything but versatile, in stark contrast to other factions they have very limited options to maneuver on the battlefield, their tanks, APCs, gatlings, V2s - it's all very slow compared to their counterparts from other factions.

I assume you are speaking from a place of playing mainly skirmish? A lot of this doesn't really hold true in online play.

GDI's advantage over the Soviets is speed and flexibility. The Soviets are powerful but also a bit of a 1-trick pony, as GDI you have both speed and brute force. Against the AI a good way to win in this match-up is to out-eco the AI. GDI's versatile defenses and artillery units are really good for defending against the AI until you can build a large economy and push back.

The Nod SSM might not be great alone against tanks, but it has a high rate of fire and more speed than any other artillery, so a group of them can kite slow targets to death, even tanks. They also tend to win artillery wars because of the high RoF.

As for the ships, we wanted to move away from the gameplay where ALL that mattered on naval maps was water control. In previous versions people would get to a point of spamming nothing but T2 and T3 ships, and once you controlled the water you could quickly level the enemy base while he could do nothing.

nahh... but thanks...i tried it also same ..same result i guess the client prevent the game to run in my system...
did the old versions have non-client exe?
maybe non client version will run...
can you give me some suggetions...?