Post news Report RSS Mac Abilities...

i cant decide how these units should play so im putting it to a vote...

Posted by on

Hey
Im trying to make up my mind and i cant.
The issue is a fairly simple one
Should the UNSC (and ori, if i say mac i also mean ori beam, since they are setup the same) have there mac attack as an ability or not, theres three choices. How it is now, and 2 other posibilities.

1) Right now the UNSC has its MAC as an ability that u need to turn on, it stays active for around 1 second firing 1-3 mac shots and then deactivates. It also stops the other weapons from firing for that time and slows the ship down. But the AI cant caim it. And from what i can tell doesn't use it.

2) One option i was tihnking of was to make it an on/off option. Either its on and the mac fires, but nothing else, or its off and all the other weapons fire but not mac. Again the AI may nto use it, but itd be more efective than its current use. Either way there would be a cool down so that u cant jsut swap back and forth doing stupid levels of damage

3) Make the MAC canons a normal weapon with a 15 second delay. This would basically make it work like the ability but it wont need to be activated as it will always be on. This opens a host of balancing issues but is quick to implement.

So those are the choices. Personally i like them as an ability, and i think option 2 would work really well, but i also owe it 2 u guys, the players (Eventually) to decide how this will work
So either post 1, 2 or 3. And ill tally them up in a week or so and thatll be that
Have fun
Spino

Comments
SpardaSon21 Online
SpardaSon21

If the AI can use it, #2 would be the best. If the AI can't figure it out, you'll have to go with #3 and probably nerf those spinal weapons to not insta-kill stuff.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+6 votes
ComradeWinston
ComradeWinston

2

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
arkangel101
arkangel101

#2 sounds the best since mac rounds are really strong.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
dron1885
dron1885

Agreed with SpardaSon21.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
HaydenB
HaydenB

3

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Vithar-133
Vithar-133

2 or 3, leaning to 3 with nerfed MACs.

I think the biggest issue with the AI is that it tries to aim as much fire power as possible at the targets (evident with the pathing if the player tells the ships to attack a target) and they move the ships around a lot, never really giving the ships time to orient anyways.

So, 3, either with nerfed MACs or a longer recharge.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
mapayne
mapayne

Cut the power down and use 3. The AI is crap enough as it is and does need some sort of help.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Adrien_Victus
Adrien_Victus

2 we all know the power of the mac sooo 3 aswell :D

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
SwiftBlizz
SwiftBlizz

Go for 3 with increased cooldown.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
joey5452
joey5452

my opinion would be let the mac be a normal weapon and give it a diff ability

like for example damage control ?
or as i would do it power to the engines cause frigates have to use their agility in battle or they will get slaughtered

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
stargate157486
stargate157486

i say 3

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
first299
first299

3 with a longer cooldown and if 3 dosnt work use 2 but i would really prefer 3 :)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
LucianoStarKiller Online
GDI_Commander
GDI_Commander

2

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
BlackDanaraki
BlackDanaraki

2 if you can get the ai to use it 3 (powered down of course) if you cant.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
p*a*t*t*o*n
p*a*t*t*o*n

3

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
Wardarth
Wardarth

i don't know much about the Mac Cannon however the Ori beam could fire at the same time as all it's other weapons however it had a very narrow angle of fire. So i'd gowith option 3 but have a small window of fire for them. Again i'm not sure how the Mac Cannon works, if it's like the main cannon in Tyber Zann's ship the Merciless then this setup should work as a tactical advantage ie it's powerful but the enemy could avoid it's arc of fire which would balance it out.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
FlySpyGuy
FlySpyGuy

1

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Spinobreaker Author
Spinobreaker

Looks like 3 will win easily enough, thought it would

How does one set (1-4 shot depending on ship) every 20-60 (again the more shots the longer the reload) seconds sound?

Reply Good karma+5 votes
pontus_08
pontus_08

Sounds balanced to me.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Adrien_Victus
Adrien_Victus

well the spitit out putting what was it 8 macs? id say a reload of a minute would balance it out

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Spinobreaker Author
Spinobreaker

good point, 1 shout = 30 second reload, 2 shot = 60, 3 shots = 90 etc

Reply Good karma+1 vote
LucianoStarKiller Online
LucianoStarKiller

more or less because larger ships are supposed to be more powerful so i suggest
1=30s
2=55s
3=80s
4=100s... or something like that

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Vithar-133
Vithar-133

I'd say add fifteen seconds per shot after the first 30.

So...

1=30
2=45
3=60
4=75

Alternatively, it could be thirty seconds per shot, so four shots has a two minute charge.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Joe756m
Joe756m

2

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
alfalfa140
alfalfa140

2

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
IanVanCheese
IanVanCheese

3 gets my vote, just with a balanced delay

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
SPARTAN291
SPARTAN291

I would go with 3 - truth be told, it's the closest to canon and wouldn't be all too hard to rebalance. As it is the Archer missiles barely used any power, and the MAC cannons did have a period where they needed to charge before firing, about 10 to 15 seconds at last counts (the Super MACs could fire a shot every 5 seconds). Balancing wouldn't be too difficult, either - just tweak the damage a bit, probably around the same as the Aggressor class destroyer's orange shot. As it is they're basically two weapons with the same idea and purpose in mind, and were of similar power, although the Aggressor's shot spread for area of effect damage upon impact, rather than fragmenting and piecing a single target as MAC rounds were designed to do.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
LucianoStarKiller Online
LucianoStarKiller

i agree

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Redbot6
Redbot6

2

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
capt10kirk
capt10kirk

two

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
ODST_General
ODST_General

Shame really as I rather liked it as an ability, I am not much for balancing stuff. So I will leave that to you guys.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
theprivate
theprivate

1 or 2 sounds the most fun........Oh my bad voting was over then NvM

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment
Sign in or join with:

Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.

News
Browse
News
New
Post news
Report
Report
Share
Related Games
Related Groups
Cyclic Productions
Cyclic Productions Developer & Publisher