R.E.A.R.M. - "Rearmament Expansion And Redesign Mod" is an unofficial Homeworld 2 expansion and it adds number of new interesting and various units.
Posts | ||
---|---|---|
Further Frigate Fun(ctionality) | Locked | |
Thread Options | ||
Mar 4 2010 Anchor | ||
Ok, I realize that this may be a bit late and you are trying to 'wrap up' frigates as a class so you can move on to other classes (like the intriguing Battleships) but this idea won't let go. If you like it (and it's do-able) maybe you could come back to it? Imagine this situation: You are playing as the Vaygr. Things have gone badly. You have ONE Artillery Frigate left, you are running and....hiding in dust clouds. (This has happened to me, I had one Artillery Frigate and one Adv. Heavy Missile Frigate left once. The idea was three ideas in one, all dependent on each other 1) Add Resource Collectors to the build list for Artillery Frigates. So now you can start harvesting again. 2) Allow the Artillery Frigate to build a Module Base, either top or bottom, upon this you can then build a single Module. Once this is built the Platforms and Modules build tabs become available. If you had enough RU left, you could bypass this step and go straight to, yup you guessed it; 3b.) Build a Hyperspace Module and Hyper in a Carrier/Supercarrier/Shipyard. So this would let you come back to a full Fleet (less MS) from a single Artillery Frigate and some RU. Or, go 'Frigate Only' and just have a bunch of Artillery Frigates, each with a single Module and Probe Production Facility. This may not 'fit' at all with what you want for your mod and that's ok, I realize that some suggestions I've made before have been well off the mark for what you want to do, just say nah if you no likey. And it won't work if the scaling is off, I need to check this tonight but had to post this idea out of my head. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ok, I've checked the scaling, Resource Collectors would fit coming out of the ArtyFrig either sideways or head first no problem; Modules though, are HUGE! I never really noticed before but a single Module easily out masses a whole Frigate. ~So. If the physical size of the Module is diminished, the strength of the Module should also be correspondingly diminished, so all values would be modified weaker. I realize the whole concept could be a rather massive compromise to HW2 canon and not at all a direction you want to go and that's all good. (It wasn't too hard to convince myself that these hugely advanced space-faring people couldn't start miniaturizing their technology, as our (human) race seems to love doing, to the point were a 'mature' technology like Modules could be effectively miniaturized to fit on a Frigate Chassis. END EDIT*
Edited by: tadamir |
||
Mar 5 2010 Anchor | ||
You're right that I want to wrap them up. And the closer I am to finish them, the more I want it. Yeah I know this kind of situation. In fact I remember myself spending more than hour attacking the enemy AI (also without production ship or maybe just carrier) who had one destroyer, one BC and bunch of useless working resource collectors and refineries plus some frigates. i was hiding my only three Artillery Frigates in a big dust cloud protecting myself with a large minefields made by the minelayer drone, building minetraps and sending them to death and building countless number of squadrons of scouts to attack something they're not meant to attack. And from some reason, I won the game eventually, but yeah, I won't be in the mood to repeat it again when something similar will happen. 1) I was about to reply that I'll check the size, but then I saw the picture and read your edited part and I can see they fit. In this case I would have to clone the collector models (because the original ones aren't depend on any subsystem), so there would be no problem to make then more expensive (which I definitelly want), or make a new model for them -why not, i have new model for the minelayer just for the frigates, I from some reason enjoy making ship which will be used only in some specific situations. It will make them unique in some point of view and from some reason, it seems logical and amusing to me. Someone else would see it to be pointless and useless. 2) Yes. Well, I have no problem with the concept. Well, I can't say even this, I have some problems with the concept, but now the techincal part of it, where the problems definitelly are: 3) The sections is called "Ships" and people tend to place their ship suggestions here and I'm fine with it. It's better to have all the ship topics together, as I said, it's called ships so it's technically correct. 4) Modules are huge. Yes they are. But... You're saing that like you've never notticed the modules on your very favourite frigate. Or the Command frigate: It has even the HS inhibitor, but very weak (I just realised i should probably make it even weaker). or wait, do you see a difference in the "module" and "sybsystem" term? Is it something different? I guess I've missed that and I've never saw it as two separate categories. Conclusion: Suggestion! Is this answer good enough? Or you've expected more. I may have written a bunch of total nonsense, but it's too late in night to read it after myself. I'm sorry, you will have to take it with all the grammar errors you'll find. I... have... no... energy... for anything better than that. Edited by: Pouk |
||
|
Mar 7 2010 Anchor | |
Hmmm... interesting points, both of you. I have to side with Pouk in terms of letting frigates -ever- be able to build shipyards. I'd say it would be okay for a frigate to hyperspace in a carrier, but carriers can HS in shipyards, so I'd say no there too. Unless... unless you could hyperspace in a special type of carrier with all sorts of unique attributes, one of which it being incapable of building shipyards. But you have to be careful there, to make sure that the unique carrier is not as desirable as a full blown carrier, otherwise in normal gameplay, players will build the unique one instead of the normal carrier. But at the same time, special carrier, and small station can be pretty much identical, it's just that one sounds like it can be fairly mobile, and the other one... not so much. Personally? I kind of like the idea as follows: Any (or most any, mothership and shipyard at least) production ship can build the special carrier and the special station. The Artillery Frigate may build special resource collectors (faster than normal collectors, but have less capactity, and in total, are less productive)(note that the Arty Frigate cannot serve as a docking point for the collectors, unless you can figure out the technical difficulties, either way shouldn't make too much of a difference). Additionally, the Artillery Frigate (which at this time, may have a name change to modular frigate, or something) can build (HS in) the special station. The special station would be about the size of the super carrier, but has a very low speed (5-40, I guess). The station has point defense guns (about the same number as a refinery (did you know that some HW2 players build refineries instead of anti-fighter frigates because refineries can actually be more effective?)), and some sort of (minor) anti-frigate/capship weapons (whatever works with the style of the ship, could be one destroyer style missile rack, or two destroyer style turrets, or six frigate style turrets, etc.). The station would have six resoruce collector drop-off points (four, nine whatever, remember they have faster movement, and lower storage capacity for RU's)(also, for normal gameplay, if would be nice if the special rescol's used the same resource dock slot as the normal rescol's, so the player can build the station for nomal gameplay, and have it actually be useful, and perhapse even more desirable than the double refinery), one module slot (standard modules, from hyperspace to engine improvement), and either one or two dock/launch bays. If two, one would be for fighters/corvettes, and the other for the special carriers. If one, then it would be large enough for the special carriers, and the fighets/corvettes would also dock/launch from the same bay. Whether or not these production slots need modules or not to do said production is in the air. The stations can build drones(?), fighters, corvettes, platforms (launch from large bay), the special resource collectors, and no other resource ships, utilities, the special carrier, and more stations. To note, you can either be able to hyperspace your frigates around, or build a platform module, and use HS gates, or you can improve you ships attack, or their defence, etc. Also to note, if you have a hs module, you can build more stations, and you can hyperspace the station itself (rediculously expensive, but the primary means of moving large distances). Finally, there is the special carrier to talk about: it is essentially a light carrier/frigate/ hybrid. The carrier may build either a corvette module, a fighter module, or a weapon system. It would be the minimum size possible to feasibly build corvettes. It does not have any module slots (so you can't build a HS module, any ship improvement module, or a platform module on it), nor does it have a resource drop-off bay. That would put its size right about that of a destroyer. I'm thinking that with a production module, it would have the firepower of a normal carrier (point defense guns), and with the weapon modules, it would have the firepower of a frigate, but not the armor of one. It would be more expensive than a frigate or carrier (whichever is cheaper, it's more expensive than that, but less expensive than the other), and generally have poorer everything than if you were to build a full blown frigate, or full blown carrier. If you choose to build a weapon module instead of a production module, your choices would generally be the same as all the kind of frigates. So you could build systems that are similar to the assault frigate, the heavy missile frigate, the command frigate, the artilley frigate (weapons, not the production systems), the laser frigate, the support frigate, etc. Again, the attack damage would be exactly the same as the frigates themselves, but the carrier would be slower, more expensive, and have less armor. With this system, If you should be able to have a few artillery frigates left over, and if you had the foresight to keep some RU's in your storeholds, you should be able to build and HS in at least one station, and a few of those special collectors (from the station or the frigates themselves). Then you should be able to get enough RU's to build drones, fighters, corvettes, platforms, carrier substitutes (special carriers), frigate substitutes (special carriers), and utilities. Once the player looses his last real production ship (other than the station, possibly the only unit that the player may purposefully build when he still has his mothership and shipyards), the only things that he can build that are as effective as before he lost everything are stikecraft, platforms, utilities, and the resource station. Everything else he either has less effective, more expensive substitutes, or can't build at all. Then for the other player(s), finishing off your opponent just means eliminating the rest of the Vay players artillery frigates, and stations (which shouldn't be too hard to find), and the Vay player can no longer get more resources, then eliminate the special carriers to completely kill them (what threat they are, as all the player can do with the special carrier is build some more strikecraft with their remaining resources). Idea's considered, but scrapped: |
||
Mar 7 2010 Anchor | ||
Firstly, thank you for your informative response. -Impressive that you won the game eventually! I must admit I originally posted without fully thinking the concept through, for instance, I missed the fact that you'd need to build a Research Module before any Hyperspace Module becomes available! After more thought, I totally agree that a Shipyard would be a bit much to Hyper-in. Posting from work, so its difficult to write as much as I'd like right now. I want to address all the points you've raised but it's tricky today. Edited by: tadamir |
||
Mar 8 2010 Anchor | ||
I really didn't have the time to respond yesterday, I've read it, I wanted to, but I had no time. Hell_Diguner : At fisrt I was surpsised when you said Supercarrier sized station. I thought it's way too much. But when I thought it through, it makes more sense than hyper in just the carrier, it's slower to make the actual carrier (which I like), it's slow to move and everything it should be. Plus you can't have it much smaller if you want to produce frigate/carrier hybrids (I love the ship idea. I had planned relativelly small production platforms/one-move stations with just an engine and production slot and nothing else, but this carrier/frigate is good, it's very Vaygr. And eventually maybe we can have both.). Back on topic: I like the whole idea, I think it's very good as it is. Just few things: -firtly I had an idea to split the frigate production slot to the utility one and the drone one, in case we will have smaller collectors. I still may do it, one for probes, one for traps and minelayers, but I think when we can have the station, I don't want to build collectors from the frigate at all. Let's keep it a long range warship with the scouting ability (probe production) and with few other usefull military things to build. Just keep the collectors out of this concept, because we can have them eventually from the station. (BTW I know already how would I like the station to look like). -second thing: All right, we have an artillery frigate and it can build something like the HS module/HS beacon. This thing would fit to the Command frigates, but I have to find out, how to justify it for artillery frigates. I know we want it on Artillery frigates (BTW I'm not gonna rename them) and it's not very likely to have one command frigate to survive at the end together with Arty frigates, but how to justify it then? -fistly the module has to be expensive, but that's not really what I'm talking about. I'm talking about "How to make it so it won't seem to be weird to build thing like this on an artillery frigate"... For example call it an "energency HS beacon" or somehow allow to player to build it only when there's no other production ship (I have no idea how), or something else. Do you know what I'm talking about? OR! To make it for both, command and artillery frigate, but make it researchable first. Something like a precautions you have to think about first, you have to plan, or you're screwed when the dissaster happen. Imagine thinking if you should invest a load of money to something you may not use, but what can save you. You don't do it and your MS will die and you would be thinking: "Why, why I didn't research it, it could be a lot easier now" or you do research it but the RU pressure will be to much to handle. Or imagine the situation when you know your MS is going down and you have nothing left except the frigates, you can't jump the MS and you know it will be dead pretty soon. Then you'll try to research this safety system while you still have the research module on your MS and while you still have the MS itself. When you make it in time before it blows up, you can continue. You can build your station from your artillery or command frigate and you're not dead yet. Or you won't research it in time and you're done. I'm looking forward to make the small frigate/carrier, you know how I love hybrids. Actually, if you want me to make something, all you need to do is to call it a "hybrid" and you know I'm in. tadamir: Still waiting for your oppinion/reply you couldn't make. Edited by: Pouk |
||
Mar 8 2010 Anchor | ||
I have no internets at home lately so I printed out both your replies, took it home and wrote responses to bring in today.
Pouk; the ideas in your new reply are great, I especially like the 'must be researched first' idea, the choice of whether to spend RU early if you are harvesting well, to have the research done as a kind of Insurance (defensive), or spend that RU on more ships for your fleet (aggressive). Ignore the stuff below that you have now kinda decided you won't do, a lot of what I wrote last night has become redundant but that's ok. 1) Yes, the minelayer drone you made for the Frigates is really good, it just 'fits' the HW2 style so well and I'd be very interested to see what kind of compact resource collector just for Frigates you might come up with, should you choose to do it. As Hell_Diguner mentioned, it would be faster than standard collector (less mass > higher speeds), and as you say, more expensive (advanced tech?).
Hm, maybe the frigate built collectors are unmanned drones?
A Frigate crew must be fairly limited, can't be losing vital men and women to crew collectors?
(Not that I'm really worried about that much realism, but it's interesting to think of now and then).
So even if the Module side of the idea doesn't pan out, Frigate built collectors could be cool.
Come to think of it, ironically, they'll most likely end up salvaging destroyed Frigate hulks
more than anything, which has a pleasing sort of efficiency to it.
I had a further idea towards the Frigate RU drop-off problem -
your Support Frigate has a nice slot along the top of both hangars
that I can see a collector 'swiping' through on its left edge (bridge out).
Increased functionality to the Supp Frig, build an RU drop-off on the roof?
-Nice big hold for RU.
Hmm, or make a third version of Support Frigate entirely; no strikecraft, no lasers,
just 2 RU-Controller-style swipers on top of both hangars? (pathing!?!)
Would you be willing to modify a version of the SF geared for RU Drop-off?
With an enlarged hangar opening capable of accepting salvaged Frigate hulks
(just moving the opening up slightly looks like it may do it?)
and swipers on top and bottom of front hangar.
Wait, would Frigate hulks being stuffed into Frigates be silly?!
So in the 'Frigates able to harvest' scenario you'd need to save at least an Arty Frig and a Supp Frig? It's a two ship system.
And must be researched beforehand too (like your Hyperspace Beacon idea). Vaygr have 3 RU drop-off behaviors as far as I can tell; 'swiping' through the Controller, (Frigate Sized)
'touching down' on the Carriers pad,
and 'passing thru' with the MS and SY (which is still 'touching down').
I thought of ways each of these could be used with the Artillery Frigate,
and recently now with the Support Frigate, which suddenly made sense.
2) You have a good point, it may all be too much, and may cross that line from good game play to just annoying.
I can imagine the whole idea mirrored with the Hiigs too though -The Module-Base thing;
I thought it would be too easy and inelegant to just slap a scaled down 'Module build area' texture
straight down on the Arty Frig and build the mini-module on that.
A Module Base subsystem allows the mini-module placement to look and 'fit' better I guess.
The complication was deliberate, add to the expense, add to the hassle and time it would take for the player
to get to the module, maybe as punishment for getting so hammered.
I admit I hadn't thought of the scripting/coding issues.
3) Damn, I didn't fully think of the implications of a Hyperspace mini-module on a Frigate!
I was so focused on just being able to Hyper-in a proper build capable ship like a Carrier (or the outpost)
to recover from those units being wiped out that I didn't think that now your last few Frigates can go Jumping
around as much as they can afford (assuming they get RU collectors and drop-off points,
this may be fairly indefinite!) (Hyper-Beacon solves this)
Yeah, that could make for an annoying end-game for some people I guess.
At some point you just gotta take the loss, you're right.
-I'm honoured that you'd offer to send me a modified ship, I honestly am.
However, I would feel bad knowing that precious time and effort is being used that could go towards Mod content for everyone,
so thank you but don't worry. 4) 'Modules are Huge!' - You know, I never really did do a studied comparison of a Module and a Frigate, or any other ship really.
Seems silly now.
Don't know if you are aware of this beautiful HW2 site, it really explains it much better than I can the whole Subsystem thing;
Rakrent.com Go to the 'Subsystems' page (won't let me link direct for some reason) *Huh. You said the solution; instead of building a Hyperspace Module ON the ArtyFrig, (scrap the whole complicated Module idea) build a Beacon that comes out of the Probe Facility like it was a probe, looks appropriate for a hyper-beacon though, one shot movement of course (so you can send the Beacon where you want the Outpost/whatever to arrive), and this Hyperspace Beacon then allows you to Hyper-in an Outpost or Light Cruiser.
This solves the 'never-ending game' problem too, no Frigates jumping everywhere too easily. Perhaps they can hyper-in RU Controllers too, to solve the Drop-off problem? Small hyper-radius, expensive, long build time, all the usual 'make it hard' stuff.* Hope any of this makes sense, it's all a bit chopped and changed now. Edited by: tadamir |
||
|
Mar 9 2010 Anchor | |
Hmmm, so piecing things together, the scenario goes like this: Vay player for one reason or another has researched the (I'll call it) Emergeny Reinforcements Beacon (ERB)(I'm thinking more uses for this later, but now I'm trying to figure out exactly what you, Pouk, immediately have in mind now). This beacon is essentially a probe that can be built by the artillery frigate, and this probe is capable of building the Resource Station, which hyperspaces in as the "reinforcement". This station can then build normal resource collectors (maybe it has two docked already when if HS's in, I know it's possible) which can do their job, and dock with the station. Then the station can build the carrier/frigate hybrid, (and presumably some of the other things I mentioned? Probes, drones, platforms, fighters, corvettes?), and the carrier/frigate hybrid can either go an attack rout, or a production rout. Either way, it can mimic (poorly) almost any frigate and carrier on the Vay side. Things I'd like to point out: So the stations would be: Sized about that of the supercarrier (volume wise I would think, maybe a little smaller), built by the Station Hyperspace Beacons (which may be divided into each type of station, for instance, Resource Station Hyperspace Beacon, or Frontline Defence Station Hyperspace Beacon, just to be sure that the artillery/command frigate can only build that one type of station), be incredibly slow (but can move none-the-less so as to reposition themselves just right after being built), heavily armored, decently armed, have inherent hyperspace gate abilities (or researchable, whatever), and be able to hyperspace itself and other units the normal way too) --Thinking about combining the Line Station and Defense Station together for the Vaygr, and having the two seperate for the Hiigarans... It's late at night though, I'm not going too much further. The cool thing about these stations is they add a whole new dimension of strategy without changing much of anything in the game other than adding the units themselves (hopefully, I see no problem so far...). And these are small stations, there's still room for shipyard sized stations, and even larger stations if you want them Pouk. ...hehe, I used to drive the Complex guys nuts with long forum posts like this. At least they're interesting though. I hope. Too lazy to run this though word for spelling and grammar. |
||
Mar 10 2010 Anchor | ||
I finally have a time to reply. Finally...: tadamir: 3) 4) 5) Hell_Diguner: Not only artillery frigate can build beacons. The large beacons (as I suggested above) would be buildable in carriers etc.) --I can't see no problem in this. Because: --You people are all talking about all those things like they're (or at least I think they are) buildable and unlocked only by the artillery frigate. But I've always saw it as "also" in the artillery frigate. Beacons, stations, hybrids... you can build them in your MS if you want (depends on research, modules, other circumstances, but possible.). So don't worry, I'm aware of the possibility of using it elsewhere. --I understand. I have no problem with no refineries after a player screw up. I welcome that. --yes... (I've wrote it just so you know I'm not talking about the next thing..) --command frigates: because i was talking about beacon subsystem and not beacon probe at that time, let's keep it as probe and let's not build anything from command frigate. It has large sensors already, I'm not sure if it needs probes. But I'm not rejecting the idea. Maybe with research or something. Maybe I'll do it. --yeah. What about the unitcaps? I have to say I want it under carriers, because putting it under frigates would cause the same problem as with the frigate refineries of tadamir. I don't want to enlarge the number you can build of those specific units as refinery and carrier. --good point.... But wait, it can. It can jump close to them to rescue them. I do it often, I'm doing those rescue operations when I jump to my units with carrier in order to save them. I've once even jumped to the badly damaged allied AI destroyer, which was under attack and he's used the HS range of my carrier as I presumed and jumped the DD to safety. --Nice, looks like we both have the same ideas about the HS beacons, except... What? Defense, command ability, building, what else? The thing I wanted is just a beacon. Flying HS module with hyper-in ability. What you have is lot of things. How big is it? Big right? It has to be big when it can do everything what ships in HW2 can do and even the things we just talk about they should do. I'm sorry, my HS beacon will be just what I said it will be, for big stations will be time later. --oh... wow.... that is a great idea actually. Really great idea. Well, I again see it pretty much different way than you do, but what you've said is brilliant. -Surprise, so many HS beacons? I wanted only two... I guess you have different ideas. Maybe, but as I said, it can't be a gate and a turret at the same time. --Don't call it defense station, we are somewhere else again if you want it to be a defense station... --Well, all your station ideas... I didn't read them all, because I don't want to make anymore stations right now and because I have my own stations ideas. Actually, a lot of stations ideas, believe me. Plus stations aren't even a priority, so I'm not even sure if to make all of my own stations... No problem with long post, really. Edited by: Pouk |
||
Mar 10 2010 Anchor | ||
Hi Pouk, 2) It's reassuring that you are unwilling to compromise your core vision for what your mod should be, but it is also good that you are willing to listen to people's ideas, like Hell_Diguners' above, and perhaps incorporate them. 3) Ha, don't get me wrong, I would enjoy it immensely, was being humble I guess. 4) Yeah I face-palmed again when I re-read some stuff, of course you already have Modules/Subsystems on the Command Frigate, sorry! 5) Ok, that all makes sense, far more sense than what I was thinking and yes, for Vaygr Only. The solution you wrote is way better. - Conclusion; sit back and let you get on with what you are doing, and doing so well. (Man, you would've hated my lame idea for a Laser Frigate! Feel free to point and laugh; that's 6 BC point defense lasers scaled down maybe 30%, with at least a 30% reduction in stats. The grey stuff is Ion Cannon Frigate 'steam' animation to represent the heat given off by the huge batteries of power generators for the lasers. To be clear, I'm not suggesting this, just showing you a thought experiment!) Edited by: tadamir |
||
Mar 10 2010 Anchor | ||
2) I listen, I do. I'm curious what you guys come up with and it's already absolutely certain that I'll make the resource base and the hybrid and it was your people idea, based on what you have started. But I know what I want to do, I know it exactly and sometimes it doesn't fit into my plans. I'm willing to implement anything, but it have to make sense in the bigger picture. My opinion sometimes may be about personal preferences, I'm human as everyone, but I really do try to base it on logic (and game logic) and Homeworld tradition. You've said "unwilling to compromise your core vision" and I guess you're right. But that's how it is. I'm not sure if I'm not too strict in this, but I do listen to new ideas and when someone has a different opinion than me or say that I'm wrong, I want him to explain it and I think about it. 4) I did. It's a great site, I have downloaded everything about the ships once from there, but I've forget about it, now I've recalled. 5) lame? It's not lame. It would be lame if you would actually want to base it on the support frigate hull, but the concept isn't lame at all. Let me think... Only problem is that my laser frigate (which is only on paper yet) uses the same weapons (which I mean lances, well, modified lances). What to do?... Edited by: Pouk |
||
Mar 11 2010 Anchor | ||
2) I said this - "unwilling to compromise your core vision" as a very good thing, I'm really glad that is how it is. So many other mods don't seem to have a strong enough concept/vision to start with and allow too much external input to compromise the original idea. Stay strict! Don't water it down! ~Ironic for me to say considering some of the crazy ideas I've suggested, but anything I suggest I'm glad will be put through your logic test, and you've been right a few times already. 4) Choice 5) I thought it lame because I did base it on the Supp Frig. I don't have that creative spark of originality. Conceptually I don't think it's lame, I'm thinking now that a 30% reduction in size and stats won't be enough to make those massive laser apertures fit, but that number must be the easiest part to figure out. Also I thought that 6 may be too much; 4 at most, considering the BC is so much larger and only powers 4. I don't think using those lasers is lame at all, it makes sense to me; they have the tech already, I can imagine the Vaygr using what they already have in different ways. |
||
Mar 11 2010 Anchor | ||
2) Ok then 5) Wait a minute... I'm not sure what exactly are you saying, if to use this for the laser frigate hull I've planned or something else, and I can't really process it very well (I didn't sleep last night and now I'm on redbull to keep me awake because of some other work... But don't worry, the mod release isn't in danger)... So I don't really want to think today. |
||
Mar 11 2010 Anchor | ||
5) Haha, I know that feeling only too well; No Sleep+Work=Redbull. Ah, which "holes" are you referring to? No need to reply today, take the day off! |
||
Mar 11 2010 Anchor | ||
No problem, it will be short: |
||
Mar 11 2010 Anchor | ||
Haha, ok, that makes it very clear, cheers for the clarification Pouk. |
||
|
Mar 11 2010 Anchor | |
>_< My internet wasn't working for two days, so that's why I had no response. Glad to see some of my ideas you like Pouk. The main point of me handing ideas to you is so you can consider them to fit into your style. My main point of all the stations descriptions etc. was to suggest the idea of frigate to battlecruiser sized -mostly- immovable defensive ships, imply that they have their own unit cap, imply that the unit cap would be large (~corvette sized?), and imply the additional layers of tactical gameply that these units could add to the game. And then to also suggest that larger stations could be implemented as you had previously been planning along with these smaller stations (searching for a better name for these smaller stations... bunkers, garrisons, fortifications ... mining/defenseive/reconnosance garrisons? maybe not). I was talking about different types of HS beacons because I wanted to make sure that the artillery frigate could only build the HS beacon type that could only build the mining station (garrison), and not the other station types. I just wanted to suggest a solution to that problem, there are several other solutions that come to mind too. If the Hiigs don't have HS gates, do they have HS beacons for their own stations? Or perhapse the stations must be built by a carrier or other production ship. No, I don't like that, far as I personally see it, both races must have stations (for back and forth strategic gameplay, you love the Vaygr, don't you want to use all your special purpose super lethal ships on some targets of interest other than the boring old hiigaran production ships, and boring old resource pockets?), both races must hyperspace the stations in with HS beacons (though the Vay beacons might be able to act as HS gates, and the Hiig ones not...), and both races must have a good variety of said stations. Wait, if the Vay HS beacons also have HS gate abilities, is there any point in having seperate units? Then again, the HS gate platform couldn't possibly be produced by a frigate (platforms are larger than rescol's). Maybe make the HS gates a little cheaper, and the HS beacons significantly more expensive (not too much of course)? Oh yes, allow any ship that can build probes to build HS beacons, definitely. But if all your (real) production ships die, then the only unit left that could build the beacons would be your trusty old artillery frigate. Still think it would make sense if the command frigate could build probes and HS beacons though. The command frigate is more the communications ship after all. But that would mean making a production system for the command ship.... ....hmmm, just had another idea, automated scout drones... buildable by the command frigate. Might have to visit that though. Laser frigate: BC laser slit (thumbs up), new laser turret specifically designed for this frigate (thumbs down). Edited by: Hell_Diguner |
||
Mar 11 2010 Anchor | ||
I'll definitelly reply to that later, I just don't have the time nor energy for more now. -Command frigate building probes: yeah, why not. It does make sense and it's not anything complicated, it's a detail, I can give it to you to the 0.0.3b.. (not beacons, just the probe subsystem) -HS beacons, all the Hiigs thing... You know I really don't want to make HS beacons for Hiigaran and of course it's also because I like my Vaygr, but... Listen. Why would I for example couldn't do a whole fleet of stations for Hiigaran and make only few for Vaygr.. for example. Why shouldn't I give HS beacons only to Vaygrs? It's not that great thing, it's handy, it makes them more mobile (which I want) and it's one of the things I like for Vaygr (you know, those nasty surprise, Vaygr definitelly need more nasty surprises and mobility). I'll be giving them all those things which makes you jumping you your chair laughing and clapping, no matter how mature you are, while Hiigarans will get more modularity, more defense, stronger armor... And Hiigarans also get their Hi-tech toys. Hiigaran are Hi-tech race and it's easier to make something like this, some "evil" hi-tech weapon for them then for Vaygr. So don't be surprised when I find something which fits Vaygr very well and I want to dedicate it only to them. Because Hiigarans have it easier, you can make all kinds of ideas for them: defense shields, drones, cloaking, holograms, HS driven mines, black holes emitors, antimatter beams... I could continue (actually I couldn't I can't think now, but normally I could, believe me..) So, beacons are Vaygr only... It makes them mobile, inpredictible, it allows them to rise from dead (your base and hybrid carrier). You don't think it's perfect? I can't hardly think about anything better for them. Anyway... I've said I don't have a time... Well, I guess I'll see the morning sunshine before I'll go to bed. I still have a lot of work to do. I'm not sure if I have anything else to say and it was supposed to be short at first. Edit: There's nothing else I wanted to reply at. Your frigate? Yes you had this kind of frigate, with huge cannon. It's basically a ion frigate with laser or something, I don't remember. Anyway that's why I didn't wanted it for Vaygr, because I thought it's too much like an ion frigate. So what was the essense? You're saying anti-capships and artillery? If it was Hiigaran then what? Edit 2: Edited by: Pouk |
||
|
Mar 11 2010 Anchor | |
Lol, all three of us are on at one time... first time ever. Real post coming momentarily... Edit: (hopefully you notice this edit since editing doesn't update the forum by saying that there has been a new post) The frigate concept was deliberately made to be as non-hiigaran ion cannon as possible. I had two large (laser corvette style) laser type weapons mounted one above the other. The idea was they would fire at a similar speed, maybe even faster than the laser corvette's weapons. Damage would be low (firerate high). Range would be lower than the hiig ion cannon frigate. So the unit would be more like the large calliber kinetic turrets (close range unit) than anything else. All in all, the only thing making the unit like the ion cannon frigate is that it's weapons are fixed foreward, and it fires a weapon that looks a little like a pulsar, and pulsars are associated as tiny ion cannons. I would imagine the Hiigaran version firing either large plasma bombs, or gigantic pulsars. The Hiigaran adaptation would make sense as an artillery frigate more than anything else. If it fires large plasma bombs, I would imagine two to four scaled up bomber styled plasma bomb launchers that recoiled as they fired (vay laser corvette recoil is only example). If it fired gigantic pulsars, I would imagine two to four specially designed weapons that also recoiled as they fired (again, laser vette only example), but I can't seem to think of an example for the new weapons appearence. Best I can do to describe it would be like an ion cannon frigate's weapon innards moved to be externally attached to the frigate, scaled down a bit, and, of course, it fires in quick bursts like a pulsar, not long like the ion cannon. Once the weapon's appearence is solidified, it could also be used on a modular slot for destroyers (heavy destroyer modular fixed foreward weapons slot?) and larger vessels. Come to think of it though, the Hiigarans are the more modular based race, and the vaygr are supposed to be very non-modular. So maybe have a modular frigate hull, with an upper and a lower weapon slot. Then have all sorts of weapon systems that could be placed on either one or the other. Three different anti-capship type weapon modules, two different anti-fighter ones, two anti-corvette (probably 1 fighter only, one both, and one corvette only), two different artillery modules, several (I mean like... seven or more) non-combat modules etc. The flak module would need to "build" the nose of the flak frigate and have the actual turret floating behind it, so in-game it looks like the flak frigate itself. Ditto any pulsar turret system, or any turret system really. You'll notice frigates seem to be more left/right weapon oriented than the vaygr top/bottom. Even the flak turrets can be differentiated as left or right, so it only makes sense that the modules would be left/right. I'd assume the modular frigate would have a "blank" front so fixed foreward weapons won't look strange, and then the turret based modules would need to "rebuild" the left/right sides of the frigate. I'm not jumping the gun by suggesting the basis of the modular frigates though am I? It seemed like it flowed too well to not go ahead and talk about it. This is the "Frigate Fun(ctionality)" thread too... Edited by: Hell_Diguner |
||
Mar 14 2010 Anchor | ||
I like the left/right orientation (I can also use exising modular DD icons icon for this) and it will support the Hiigaran asymmetry. I'll make them. About the laser frigate... I'll see, not for Vaygr. Maybe something I'll make for Hiigaran will be similar to this idea of yours, but I have other plans. |
||
May 2 2010 Anchor | ||
hello everyone first ever post 1)On the Vaygr front. I'm surprised no one has mention it this a hyperspace frigate. it is a frigate with a hyperspace gate mounted on the front. when moving around normally the 4 arms will be closed together but when it is stopped one can chose to activate it. when activated the hyperspace gate's arms open and allow travel through. it would have some sort of defense like 2 of the assault ships turrets, i think as everyone one says "it's very Vayyygar" it would enable long range hit and run to different locations. 2)On the Hiigarans front what about a recon frigate with better sensors (between normal and probe) as well as some sort of EMP burst weapon that affects a radius around the ship to allow for a get away or to be used offensively, what every floats your boat. and some way of self defense apart from this like Hiigaran Gunship turrets or nothing substantial so that is essentially a large scout. could also have the ability for short jumps but doesn't grant the ability to anyone else or some sot of cloaking. ideal it could have a small hanger to carry scouts but not sure. fantastic work so far, i discovered this mod looking for cool concept art the Hiigaran super carrier is beautiful. anywho thats enough of me talking i have alot more ideas if you need them though Pouk Regards Edited by: commander-jao |
||
May 2 2010 Anchor | ||
Hi and welcome. Basically, you have good ideas. 1) I did try, others did try and it's one of the thing that simply doesn't work. Forums.relicnews.com I've found the fact that the gate/ship doesn't shoot after establishing the HS link myself when I was attempting to make advanced gates. Apparently it also won't move. 2) You'll get at least one Hiigaran recon frigate, it's planned. 3) Hmm. I won't remove the turret, sorry. But I was thinking about including the Supercarrier into the more advanced research. Yes, there'll be another level of research for things that will come, I'm seriously considering making research station for level 3 for Hiigarans and research ship for level 2 for Vaygr. Under this research will be Battleships for example and maybe the Supercarrier as well. This way it would be more later ship and it would be fine, because compared to the battleships it won't be that strong anymore. If you have more, say it. I'm curious. |
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.