The reapers have returned from dark space. With Earth under attack and the mass relays in a state of chaos from refugees and the councils fleet engaging reaper forces the galaxy is a mess. The outcome is unknown, the warfare is devastating. The galaxy will never be the same.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
RSS feed Report content Cerberus Carrier Cruiser (view original)
Cerberus Carrier Cruiser
embed
share
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Tweet Email a friend
Embed Image
Comments
HaydenB
HaydenB

I'm not sure I like the bow.. It seems too open...

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Shockmatter
Shockmatter

Like the design. Looks a little wide though but that might just be me.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Sapper4-1
Sapper4-1

Interesting with where its going but the bow is too blunt.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
V.Metalic
V.Metalic

Agree, the front is little "empty". Maybe even just the "antennas" would be enough.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Unikraken Creator
Unikraken

I love the bow. It's a carrier in space guys, it has no use for sleek edges. Its whole point is to **** fighters.

Reply Good karma+12 votes
Sweawm
Sweawm

I don't agree with the design either. I know it's meant to be function over looks, but sleeker ships always look better.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
GreenBeret3
GreenBeret3

Yeah, and it should look akin to the other Cerberus ships so this seems fine.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Adrien_Victus
Adrien_Victus

The ship doesnt fit the ME universe, ships in ME are typically long and slim due to the increase in power for the mass accelerators, Carriers should be no exception. Despite being used to house fighters and the absence of a mass accelerator iirc.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
880Zero
880Zero

All those openings would pose a serious structural integrity weakness. Even if the ship could sustain kinetic barriers, it's hull would still buckle from stress.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Geth_Prime
Geth_Prime

Hangars are a structural weakness, I would recommend putting the landing bay in the bow and put launch tubes on the side.

But i like it none the less.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Nanopizza
Nanopizza

I kinda agree with V. Metalic and unikraken, I like the design, I do not mind the bluntness, infact I quite like it but I think it is a little to blunt, I think just some antennas on the front would top this model off perfectly.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
V.Metalic
V.Metalic

Yeah, and maybe to fill the "hole" of the sides on the bow, adding the antennas and maybe some protrusions or small guns in here.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Landkreuzer
Landkreuzer

You do realize that those holes are the hangars?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
V.Metalic
V.Metalic

On the front? I doubt that these two which are on the sides (on bow side) are hangars.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment
Sign in or join with:

Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.

Description

Heavy Cruiser outfitted to carrier several wings of fighters.

Details
Date
Size
1718×932
Options
URL
Embed
Embed Thumb
Share
Feed
RSS feed