The reapers have returned from dark space. With Earth under attack and the mass relays in a state of chaos from refugees and the councils fleet engaging reaper forces the galaxy is a mess. The outcome is unknown, the warfare is devastating. The galaxy will never be the same.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Media RSS Feed Report media Cerberus Carrier Cruiser (view original)
Cerberus Carrier Cruiser
view previous next
Post comment Comments
HaydenB Apr 14 2012, 1:45am says:

I'm not sure I like the bow.. It seems too open...

+3 votes     reply to comment
Shockmatter Apr 14 2012, 2:17am says:

Like the design. Looks a little wide though but that might just be me.

+3 votes     reply to comment
Sapper4-1 Apr 14 2012, 2:23am says:

Interesting with where its going but the bow is too blunt.

+2 votes     reply to comment
V.Metalic Apr 14 2012, 3:04am says:

Agree, the front is little "empty". Maybe even just the "antennas" would be enough.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Unikraken Creator Online
Unikraken Apr 14 2012, 3:07am says:

I love the bow. It's a carrier in space guys, it has no use for sleek edges. Its whole point is to **** fighters.

+12 votes   reply to comment
Sweawm Apr 14 2012, 3:37am says:

I don't agree with the design either. I know it's meant to be function over looks, but sleeker ships always look better.

+2 votes     reply to comment
GreenBeret3 Online
GreenBeret3 Apr 14 2012, 3:37am says:

Yeah, and it should look akin to the other Cerberus ships so this seems fine.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Adrien_Victus Apr 14 2012, 5:30am says:

The ship doesnt fit the ME universe, ships in ME are typically long and slim due to the increase in power for the mass accelerators, Carriers should be no exception. Despite being used to house fighters and the absence of a mass accelerator iirc.

+1 vote     reply to comment
880Zero Apr 14 2012, 5:40am says:

All those openings would pose a serious structural integrity weakness. Even if the ship could sustain kinetic barriers, it's hull would still buckle from stress.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Geth_Prime Apr 14 2012, 11:59am says:

Hangars are a structural weakness, I would recommend putting the landing bay in the bow and put launch tubes on the side.

But i like it none the less.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Nanopizza Apr 14 2012, 4:15pm says:

I kinda agree with V. Metalic and unikraken, I like the design, I do not mind the bluntness, infact I quite like it but I think it is a little to blunt, I think just some antennas on the front would top this model off perfectly.

+1 vote     reply to comment
V.Metalic Apr 14 2012, 4:16pm replied:

Yeah, and maybe to fill the "hole" of the sides on the bow, adding the antennas and maybe some protrusions or small guns in here.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Landkreuzer Apr 14 2012, 5:59pm replied:

You do realize that those holes are the hangars?

+1 vote     reply to comment
V.Metalic Apr 14 2012, 6:35pm replied:

On the front? I doubt that these two which are on the sides (on bow side) are hangars.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only


Heavy Cruiser outfitted to carrier several wings of fighters.

Image Details
Apr 14th, 2012
Embed (big)
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only