The reapers have returned from dark space. With Earth under attack and the mass relays in a state of chaos from refugees and the councils fleet engaging reaper forces the galaxy is a mess. The outcome is unknown, the warfare is devastating. The galaxy will never be the same.

Add media Report RSS Cerberus Carrier Cruiser (view original)
Cerberus Carrier Cruiser
embed
share
view previous
Share Image
Share on Facebook Post Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
HaydenB
HaydenB - - 256 comments

I'm not sure I like the bow.. It seems too open...

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Shockmatter
Shockmatter - - 1,005 comments

Like the design. Looks a little wide though but that might just be me.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Sapper4-1
Sapper4-1 - - 214 comments

Interesting with where its going but the bow is too blunt.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
V.Metalic
V.Metalic - - 2,440 comments

Agree, the front is little "empty". Maybe even just the "antennas" would be enough.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Unikraken Creator
Unikraken - - 3,224 comments

I love the bow. It's a carrier in space guys, it has no use for sleek edges. Its whole point is to **** fighters.

Reply Good karma+12 votes
Sweawm
Sweawm - - 116 comments

I don't agree with the design either. I know it's meant to be function over looks, but sleeker ships always look better.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
GreenBeret3
GreenBeret3 - - 28 comments

Yeah, and it should look akin to the other Cerberus ships so this seems fine.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Adrien_Victus
Adrien_Victus - - 3,823 comments

The ship doesnt fit the ME universe, ships in ME are typically long and slim due to the increase in power for the mass accelerators, Carriers should be no exception. Despite being used to house fighters and the absence of a mass accelerator iirc.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
880Zero
880Zero - - 2,557 comments

All those openings would pose a serious structural integrity weakness. Even if the ship could sustain kinetic barriers, it's hull would still buckle from stress.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Geth_Prime
Geth_Prime - - 639 comments

Hangars are a structural weakness, I would recommend putting the landing bay in the bow and put launch tubes on the side.

But i like it none the less.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Nanopizza
Nanopizza - - 85 comments

I kinda agree with V. Metalic and unikraken, I like the design, I do not mind the bluntness, infact I quite like it but I think it is a little to blunt, I think just some antennas on the front would top this model off perfectly.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
V.Metalic
V.Metalic - - 2,440 comments

Yeah, and maybe to fill the "hole" of the sides on the bow, adding the antennas and maybe some protrusions or small guns in here.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Landkreuzer
Landkreuzer - - 354 comments

You do realize that those holes are the hangars?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
V.Metalic
V.Metalic - - 2,440 comments

On the front? I doubt that these two which are on the sides (on bow side) are hangars.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account:

Description

Heavy Cruiser outfitted to carrier several wings of fighters.