Modern Combat transports players into the midst of a high-tech war between the current-day Chinese and U.S. militaries. Incorporating all-new factions, units, doctrines, gamemodes, artwork, music, maps, and singleplayer missions, we aim to craft the most immersive and enjoyable strategic representation of 21st-century combat possible on the PC.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Report RSS USdoctrineUI (view original)
USdoctrineUI
embed
share
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Post Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
Henry12
Henry12 - - 17 comments

shouldn't it be Close Quarters Battle ? :)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Darkbladecr Creator
Darkbladecr - - 1,039 comments

Both mean the same thing, and CQB may be more related to personal battles, while CAB is more related to large scale warfare.

Reply Good karma+8 votes
nizzemancer
nizzemancer - - 8 comments

Urban Combat or M.O.U.T. Warfare would probably have sounded better.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
heavy_metal49
heavy_metal49 - - 2 comments

yes and no, close quarters battle is house to house room to room where you engage combatants at a very short distance, eg hand to hand. Close area battle is when the enemy is close enough to throw a grenade at but not to engage in hand to hand.

Reply Good karma Bad karma0 votes
I_am_a_Spoon Creator
I_am_a_Spoon - - 1,878 comments

"Close Area Battle" isn't even a common pre-established term... Google that exact phrase, and this mod will be the first to mention it.

Google.com.au

Reply Good karma+2 votes
TalonFive
TalonFive - - 84 comments

No worries, these sites are literally paradise for this kind of smartasses, never able to do their own project and only keep lecturing. For me it's awesome and good luck with it. Can't wait to play it ! ;D

Reply Good karma Bad karma+5 votes
iambatkam
iambatkam - - 5 comments

You are correct Mr. Spoon :P

You could always ask an active duty (or recently retired) infantryman/armor crewman for info on stuff... I have found most websites are wrong anyways.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
56er
56er - - 1,253 comments

Amoured Warfare all the time baby!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
onrAArno
onrAArno - - 115 comments

I think you should change the
>>>
---- Bonus:

Thing. It looks somewhat ugly.

Reply Good karma Bad karma-2 votes
Yanivvv
Yanivvv - - 483 comments

dont know what about you but >>>> ***** seems good enough fot me

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Darkbladecr Creator
Darkbladecr - - 1,039 comments

It's to highlight to new players what the doctrine givess as a passive upgrade. Similar to the PE kettenkrad passive benefits

Reply Good karma+2 votes
onrAArno
onrAArno - - 115 comments

But can you change it so it hasn't the >>>> ---- part in it?

Maybe you can write it in the text? Like this:

This doctrine also makes the ... upgrade available for your riflemen.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
I_am_a_Spoon Creator
I_am_a_Spoon - - 1,878 comments

It's supposed to be easy to pick out at a glance. One giant-*** blob of text looks uglier, I assure you.

Reply Good karma+3 votes
onrAArno
onrAArno - - 115 comments

But there are other ways to make something easy to pick out at a glance, like the... return/enter button.

But please make it look a little smoother. With some visual effects or something.

Sincerey onrAArno.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
TalonFive
TalonFive - - 84 comments

Sorry don't want to be a smartass (as i mentioned it here, this is just a hint) but i'm up for it too, perhaps you could write in italic and with slight orange or gold or whatever color to make it more intensive so no one can miss it.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Euphoria_21
Euphoria_21 - - 488 comments

THIS MOD IS GONNA BE AWESOME! :D

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
AirborneRangerZz
AirborneRangerZz - - 75 comments

Are there going to be Helicopters in this mod?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
MonkeySoldier
MonkeySoldier - - 624 comments

Jup, Little Bird, UH60 and Apache are featured in the mod.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
ASESINOdePUERTO-RICO
ASESINOdePUERTO-RICO - - 155 comments

Hey how many M1A2s and M1A2TUSKs can you have on the field at once(simultaneously)? Reply would be nice thanks:)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
I_am_a_Spoon Creator
I_am_a_Spoon - - 1,878 comments

As of now, as many as you want!

:)

Reply Good karma+1 vote
OnkelSam Author
OnkelSam - - 707 comments

Guess we'll limit it to 1-2.

Reply Good karma+2 votes
Drag0
Drag0 - - 764 comments

''Let the armor make a way''

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
ASESINOdePUERTO-RICO
ASESINOdePUERTO-RICO - - 155 comments

Cool, and by the way I think it should be limit of 3 (3 seems to be optimal) Keep up the amazing work guys!!! :P

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account: