feillyne
joined
« L'homme c'est rien — l'oeuvre c'est tout. » Je suis né et je vis à Babylone, là où les enfants tuent, dealent et volent...
A photo of Obama and Malik dressed as Muslims, supposedly when they met in 1985.
And now for the Barack Obama's "facts":
Barackobama.com"
Obama Has Never Been A Muslim, And Is a Committed Christian
November 12, 2007
"In the internet age, there are going to be lies that are spread all over the place. I have been victimized by these lies. Fortunately, the American people are, I think, smarter than folks give them credit for."
— Barack Obama, MSNBC Debate, January 15, 2008
Yes, yes, you are smart to believe without question what you're told. Remember American people, you are much smarter than you are credited for...
A full article:
Ginacobb.typepad.com
Well, of course that he would never say that he was Muslim (if he really was). Hell, everybody in USA would consider him a terrorist becoz this fact. They created a heavy negative propaganda against this religion.
Yeah, that's why he hides it even now. Could be immediately impeached, lynched or riots would spring up as if out of nowhere.
I don't know if he's nessesarily "dressed as a Muslim" so much as "dressed as a local". Besides, playing dressup isn't a foolproof indication of a person's beliefs; I'm no Imperialist, but I have several redcoat costumes. (I am an Empiricalist but that's different :P)
Yep, could have been dressed as a local. Still, despite it, there's more to the story, for example Obama either mocking or heavily criticicing the Bible:
Youtube.com
(A bit bigoted version, commented: Youtube.com)
Doesn't mean that his points are invalid. They may be or not.
He claims to be a Christian, yet claiming doesn't necessarily mean he is one.
So who is he? A Marxist? An Atheist? Or maybe one of those who claim to be God (instead of a single consciousness separated mentally and emotionally from others)?
Ok, so Barack's a Muslim. So? Because he's a muslim he's automatically a terrorist and enemy of the US state? Right? Erm, no.
But if it was totally confirmed/Barack confessed to being one, there would be riots, people would want to kill him, etc.
That's not the point at all!
The point is of being or not being a liar and a deceiver. I don't say anything, it's just... just a matter of perspective.
And yet, he appears to act like all of them, yet being none of them. It's such an ultimate deception.
Why not say anything severe and brand him as a liar?
Let's examine religions and political systems. They all fail because they refuse to accept equality of literally EVERY man (the rich / minorities have more rights, etc.), and because they divide people rather than unite them globally.
Religions introduced into their doctrine or regular activity, pagan celebrations and pagan customs. Atheism is perceived as a doctrine of a lack of morality of ignorance by some of so-called believers.
National identity fails at the global scale, also creating various racist backlashes or national prejudice.
These ALL systems, whether it's Atheism, "Christianity" (Christianity that introduced pagan elements into it is no longer Christianity)... are false, false because they have began their own version of "Christianity", own version of "Islam" (examine the schisms in Islam and you'll see relations between Sunni Muslims and Shias, etc.)...
... do you see?
An ultimate deception. An ultimate... ABSURDITY.
Because he as a single personality mocks the entire world dressing up as everybody (Christian/Muslim/Atheist/Marxist/Buddhist/etc.), mocks the false systems that are now far from the right way they were originally on.
Still, the point is what he does instead of what he claims to do.
By their fruits (DEEDS, what they do compared to what they SAY) ye will know them.
The total absurdity of this situation is astounding.
And the point is of being lawful (avoiding to harm anyone and doing nothing that has no sense whatsoever) or being unlawful (harming others, violating their free will, deceiving them, etc. doing things that are useless and won't help any tiny bit).
Doing vs. saying. Tell us, what's more important?
he's not a Muslim, i dressed up like a priest for Halloween but it doesn't mean im Catholic.
Do you dress as a Catholic during a regular day after having met your friend/relative?
Do you dress in heavy clothes in the tropics? no.
Do you dress in a swimsuit to a funeral? no
This is one of the DUMBEST links in the derp chain called "Birtherism"
I weared this ushanka to school and now I suddenly became a communist D:
Apparently the cloths makes the man, not the other way around!
BTW, that was a great speak by Obama.
Or maybe just maybe it was for fun?
Or he was just wearing the clothes people wear in that region.. just saying.. when in rome.
Oh yes, this OBVIOUSLY proves hes a Muslim. As its already been pointed out, wearing clothing often seen in the region doesnt instantly make somebody a part of some group or religion.
Quite frankly, I dont see why this is such a big issue. Even if he WAS a Muslim, would that really be an enormous problem? Does the leader of one of the most powerful nations in the world have to be Christian to be a valid candidate? Obviously we're at war in the Middle East against many muslimic supporters, but its not like we don't have Christian enemies as well... I might also add that Bush was ten times worse than Obama, and he's just about as American and Christian as you can get.
I also just can't understand why everyone is still stuck on beating up Obama over this sort of thing. He isnt a fabulous president or anything, but from what I can see, his actions havent exactly pushed the United States to the brink of destruction. He may not be anything close to what he promised to be, but I honestly don't think he feels that he needs to intentionally inflict harm the American government...