Comments - BigglesInSpain

Seeing as you appear to have fervently grasped the wrong end of the stick, I feel I should make it clear that that was simply a joke. At no point did I infer that I was the first person to have considered a game set in the London Underground, nor did I say anything which could be construed as causing offence. Now let's let that be an end to it.

London Underground - All the cool kids are doing it.

After a while longer than I'd anticipated, Radiant is back up and running, so let the mapping commence!

Haven't seen 2D trees since The Italian Job on the Playstation 1...

Bound to come in useful for a few people, thank you for sharing this.

Ha! It was bound to happen. Too be fair, underground after the "apocalypse" is hardly the most original thing any of us have come up with.

Ripped from Frost Nova, much?

I've been having difficulty getting this video to play properly, both here and on Youtube.

Much prefer non-competitive (well, sort of) things.

Itsatrap!

What a brilliantly ludicrous idea!

Yeah, I'll probably edit the graphics quite a bit, later on.

If you've got very low health, chances are you won't last much longer anyway. All sources of damage in Tube Wars are being amplified from Base JKA's. In a way it's intended to get in the way slightly, combined with a couple of other subtle gameplay effects, wounded players are slightly less effective than players with full health.

It took me a little while to realise what it was that I was looking at, which if you're trying to make something realistic is probably a good thing!

If possible you should add your subgroup selection to the brush tool, so that if required the brush tool will only "paint" meshes onto selected groups of other meshes. (For example, if you wanted to add foliage to a group of trees, without affecting other objects nearby.)

Lightsabre blades! Or is it cheating for me to say so?

In which case you'd probably pre-render it an overlay it as an animated shader on a menu.

Wonder where they'll hide the third blade in the sequel...

As it happens my copy of JKA and MD3View are for different operating systems, and I've yet to find a way of making them work together, or a way of cutting MD3View out. If you wouldn't mind, I might ask you to do the menial task of applying my textures to my weapon models at some point. =P

Surely if something is "unending", there can't be anything "after" it....

I'm not interested at all in whether or not Blizzard kick up a fuss about it, I'm expressing my own opinion rather than trying to second guess what Blizzard would do.

"it would just be a modification that has it's own story that does not end the saga" Either way it's not the official ending to the saga, it's fan-fiction. There's no reason why removing the "IV" from the title prevents you from intending it to follow on from Warcraft III, in fact that's generally how fan writers operate. I actually quite like the idea of trying to write your own conclusion, however brazenly calling it "Warcraft IV" just seems rather impertinent.

Anyway, the actual content you've displayed so far looks promising, it's just that one little thing that's bugging me...

What's wrong with just "Warcraft: The Edge of Eternity"? It's not Warcraft IV, don't try and pretend that it is, it just makes you sound pretentious and obnoxious.

What if he's just here casually? Seeing if there's anything specifically of interest to him ever now and again? It was a perfectly reasonable comment.

That would be fantastic, thank you very much!

No he didn't, he spelt it the English way.

Looks fantastic, you just need to blend some of the ground textures around the edges of the road, they're quite flat on closer inspection.

To be fair I am running it under a virtual machine. I don't know enough about Linux to say whether or not you could to the same.

Hang on, I need to defrost the Hi-Tek Heavy.

1. The smoothing is just a result of the renderer I used, I'm not entirely sure how to fix that but it's not going to look that way with the final model.

2. Will do.

3. Another good point. =P

4. Actually it's just split weirdly, far too many polies sharing a vertex. I was hoping it wouldn't be too noticeable but I'll redo that part.

I'm hoping this thing folds up / springs out for use.