This group is for everyone who like tanks, sci-fi tanks, real tanks, funny tanks, you can put here tank mods, tank maps, simply everything with straps, armor and gun :D

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Soviet Devastator
view previous next
Post comment Comments
Panzert Feb 8 2012, 4:43am says:

Ah, the T-35. The proof that multi-turreted tanks did not work.

+15 votes     reply to comment
CadianConscript Feb 9 2012, 9:09am replied:

Oh, they could work. The major problems with that tank is in it's design. For the crew to enter or exit the tank the main turet had to be rotated at certain angle. Also because of been such a long tank with the same clearance as normal lenght tank played a bad joke as well. The thing is, this tank had way too many design flaws.

+1 vote     reply to comment
ComeradeStalin Creator
ComeradeStalin Feb 15 2012, 6:01pm replied:

Nah, not exactly. If they were totally useless, so why germans used captured T-35s and T-28s? Germans and not anyone else! They definitely knew what they are doing. So maybe, with proper handling and operating, they were not that bad? Of course THOSE superheavy tanks were far from an ideal, but lets face it: nearly 90% of these tanks didn't even see the battle because they were killed not by germans but by technical breakdowns. Germans grabbed them, fixed and they served them well.

+1 vote   reply to comment
rkraptor70 Author
rkraptor70 Feb 8 2012, 6:53am says:

I am felling a little nostalgic,This was the third picture EVER posted in this group.

+1 vote   reply to comment
shroomman Feb 8 2012, 7:49am says:

i think 3 tanks actually severed in ww2, but as panzert allready said, they where not very efficient

+1 vote     reply to comment
Ρrʌжis Feb 8 2012, 9:57am says:

At least it wasn't as much of a bitter fail like the KV Behemoth. From the looks of it the T-35 seems to not have the ability to shoot itself. :P

+2 votes     reply to comment
Cirmisekiz Feb 8 2012, 4:07pm replied:


+1 vote     reply to comment
rkraptor70 Author
rkraptor70 Feb 9 2012, 2:01am replied:

KV?As in the Kliment Voroshilov tank or KV-1?How the hell you consider that tank as a fail?

+3 votes   reply to comment
The_Integral Feb 9 2012, 12:17pm replied:

He's probably referring to one of the failed super heavy tank designs designated under the KV name. Possible this, though it is fictional:

+1 vote     reply to comment
Ρrʌжis Feb 10 2012, 9:04am replied:

Yeah that's the one I was talking about, sorry if I wasn't clear.

+1 vote     reply to comment
ComeradeStalin Creator
ComeradeStalin Feb 15 2012, 6:10pm replied:

Fail? :D But it's still a great joke!

+1 vote   reply to comment
GriffinZ Feb 9 2012, 5:24pm says:

yeah the KV limo.

+2 votes     reply to comment
hj12321 Mar 5 2012, 1:57am says:

Its too heavy,and not have much use in war.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only


For the record,this one ain't photoshoped.

Image Details
Feb 8th, 2012
Embed (big)
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only