This group is for everyone who like tanks, sci-fi tanks, real tanks, funny tanks, you can put here tank mods, tank maps, simply everything with straps, armor and gun :D

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
Lol Again Kaput
embed
share
previous next
 
Post comment Comments
=СРБ=Ori`verda
=СРБ=Ori`verda May 8 2011, 5:58am says:

Kaput is Serbian for hat.

+8 votes     reply to comment
feillyne Staff
feillyne May 8 2011, 6:06am replied:

Kaputt is German for "broken".

+6 votes   reply to comment
☦BalkanB☢y☦
☦BalkanB☢y☦ May 8 2011, 6:56am replied:

Yeah but like feillyne said, it means broken in german,
PS: secas se one reklame za merix, kad im je stao jugo, kaput, gur, gur :D

+4 votes     reply to comment
aidas2
aidas2 May 8 2011, 10:09am replied:

That looks more like ******.

+5 votes     reply to comment
Baineblade
Baineblade May 8 2011, 6:03am says:

You know....I wouldn't be laughing if I was in that tank. Thanks for making a tanker hate you more.

+7 votes     reply to comment
feillyne Staff
feillyne May 8 2011, 6:08am replied:

Should they go inside in the first place? The tank crew are asking for attacks themselves. An armed conflict is an armed conflict, no excuse.

+1 vote   reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert May 8 2011, 9:53am replied:

It's more that fact the OP seems to enjoy seeing destroyed American tanks.

+9 votes     reply to comment
feillyne Staff
feillyne May 8 2011, 4:56pm replied:

Just like Americans enjoyed seeing bombed Iraq? When was it? 2003?

If it is human beings, you don't give a **** about them, when it's a piece of rubble from America, you do. Fine.

But one can enjoy Russian, American, and other tanks being destroyed. It's called freedom of choice, expression, whatever. You'd like to forbid him from doing so?

+1 vote   reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert May 8 2011, 5:47pm replied:

No, i don't forbid anything. But racial hatred for no reason at all is a bad thing, it's even worse if it's in retalation for someone elses racial hatred. They enjoyed seeing Iraq bombed in 2003 because they were at war, i'm not saying that's a good thing, but it's certainly more justified.

Questioning why the Americans enjoyed seeing Iraqi troops bombed is like asking why the Soviets liked to see the Germans bombed in WWII..

+7 votes     reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert May 8 2011, 6:49pm replied:

I would be saying the same thing if it were infantry and were posted up with the same intention.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Captain_Romulus
Captain_Romulus May 13 2011, 6:19am replied:

AGREED! the OP hates the US

+1 vote     reply to comment
Baineblade
Baineblade May 9 2011, 1:09am replied:

I didn't like seeing Iraqis bombed in 2003, I liked it fine in 1991 when we actually had a reason to go there.

This time however I agree with Panzert, seeing an M1 Abrams in flames, and knowing a lot of the Tankers over there, I hate seeing something like this, and seeing the other postings from the guy who put this here, he enjoys seeing American equipment destroyed for no reason other than it's American. I don't agree with it, and I really don't agree with him. Tanks are beautiful sights, but when they're in flames it's a sad thing for any Tanker, or at least it SHOULD be. I hold nothing but respect for most of the world's tankers.

+6 votes     reply to comment
feillyne Staff
feillyne May 9 2011, 2:42am replied:

That's just a piece of equipment. If it was a future tank inventor (an inventor-to-be) burning, you wouldn't give a damn.

+1 vote   reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert May 9 2011, 10:09am replied:

No, i said that i would say exactly the same thing, get that into your head.

+2 votes     reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert May 8 2011, 9:39am says:

I think you're just trolling at this point.

+3 votes     reply to comment
Phenixtri
Phenixtri May 8 2011, 3:21pm says:

This one was disabled by enemy fire then torched with thermite or phosphorous grenades/IEDs. And yet again cold hard chemistry/science owns yet again xD Looks like the devise went off on its side burning trough the bottom right side of the hull if it was thermite. Even the most advanced composite steel armor cant survive 3,000 degrees C. of liquid metal slag :/

Also the crew bailed out & im sure are just fine since the hatches are all open.

+4 votes     reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert May 9 2011, 3:58pm replied:

I highly doubt thermite was used to finish it off, Americans tend to destroy any of inoperable tanks themselves to prevent capture. Why bother torching it with thermite when you can capture it?

It would be extremely difficult to close close to it then ignite the thermite with the crew still inside..

+2 votes     reply to comment
Phenixtri
Phenixtri May 9 2011, 10:31pm replied:

My last post here should be able to help you & other understand how this would be possible. As a static AT trap it could be quite lethal but I am still testing on & off on my free time to eliminate any variables that can affect my data.

Moddb.com

+1 vote     reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert May 9 2011, 11:27pm replied:

I'm not saying it's not possible, but rather that it would be difficult to get close to a tank with a functioning turret/remote MG. Your post sort of implied that they torched it AFTER it was imobilised.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Phenixtri
Phenixtri May 11 2011, 2:27am replied:

Of course its a static tank trap. thermite could only be utilized in an offensive role is one were to some how make a thermite based AT warhead for a high velocity gun, missile, or RPG.

+1 vote     reply to comment
PatoMatador
PatoMatador May 10 2011, 5:39pm says:

Beautifull image, what is bether then see an abrans burn?

Nothing.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Panzert
Panzert May 12 2011, 7:33pm replied:

Please, elaborate on why it is a good thing to potentially see people dying.

+3 votes     reply to comment
Phenixtri
Phenixtri May 12 2011, 7:43pm replied:

The crew obviously got out alive all the hatches are open. :/ But yea im agreeing with you on this one.

+2 votes     reply to comment
The_Freedom_Fighter
The_Freedom_Fighter May 18 2011, 10:19pm says:

Y'know, in that Top Gear episode where the boys were in Alabama, they should've painted "ABRAM TANK - CRAPPIEST TANK EVER" on the sides of a car, followed by a pic of a charred abrams taped on the hood. That would've ****** the locals big time.

Problem?

+1 vote     reply to comment
Cruisn-Metal
Cruisn-Metal Aug 9 2011, 12:11am says:

The reason why there are alot of M1's taken out is bcause they're fighting an unconventional war,M1 tankers got the most experience in combat considering they're in a hostile environment most of the time,well yeah there's the challenger2, but that was just an isolated incident,only facing rpg's, unlike the abrams facing "IED's" w/c the insurgents always use alot.

So saying the abrams is a crappy tank is just damn retarded

+1 vote     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Description

XD

Image Details
Type
Entertainment
Date
May 8th, 2011
Size
416×300
Options
URL
Embed (big)
Embed
Share
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only