Images - Conservatives of ModDB

Patriarchy is mostly based on religious views. Conservatives are usually pro-religion. Anyway heres the argument for it. For others to copy.

Patriarchy is for the win.

Politics is downstream from culture.
Whoever controls the past controls the future.
Whoever controls the present controls the past.
He who controls the politic controls the present.
Whoever controls the culture controls the politic (politics=downstream from culture).
Whoever directs ideological ideas controls the culture.
Therefore mainly dominant males and intellectuals controls the present, past and future.

Blue Pill- The belief that both genders, possessing equal natures, will on average possess equal proclivities to be moral & responsible given equal qualities & quantities of invested nurture.

Red Pill- The awareness that men & women, having different natures, will on average possess different proclivities to be moral and responsible given equal qualities and quantities of invested nurture, & how this effects societies, micro and macro.

Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies, and feminine democracies give way to tyranny. -Aristotle

The micro cycle (80 years):
Hard times create strong men
Strong men create good times
Good times create baby boomers
Baby boomers create hard times...

The macro cycle (800-1200 years):
Hard times create patriarchy(where rights are dependent on responsibilities, since men usually take more responsibilities than women this system is described as patriarchy)
Patriarchy creates good times
Good times creates feminism(equal rights independent of responsibilities)
Feminism burns everything down, creating hard times...

To Adam God said, "Because YOU LISTENED TO YOUR WIFE & ate from the tree about which I commanded you not to:
Cursed is the ground because of you, through painful toil you will eat of it, all the days of your life."
-Genesis 3:17

Man's hierarchy of needs:
1. Safety
2. Food & Water
3. Shelter & Sleep
4. Social & Sexual needs
5. Communal & self esteem needs
6. Self Actualization

In every category of need in men's hierarchy, women's needs are met better in society, yet every election women vote to take more from men and give more to themselves?!

Women's hierarchy of needs:
1. Equality of Opportunity
2. Equality of Outcome
3. Equality of Authority
4. Equal Authority with no Responsibility
5. All the Authority with no Responsibility for the women, with all the Responsibilities & no Authority for the man or men(especially sexual Responsibilities & Authorities).

A tyrant has 100% authority with 0% responsibility.
A slave has 100% responsibility with 0% authority.
Today marriage, as redefined by the female democratic majority and family court system, makes the man a slave to a tyrant wife, who can divorce him at will, stealing his children, his wealth, and his human dignity.

All womens natural unregulated desire is to have sex with high status bad bad boys and get innocent men to pay for the falling through on responsibility's and avoid consequences (abortions, kids, divorce ect.). That's why women, no matter how meritocratic, should never be able to have this much control over men.

Women want equal rights authority to make all the decisions in their own life when the alpha screws women the opportunity is there. Its when responsibility slowly comes knocking that women want to shift responsibility back over to any of the innocent men. Women want to sit at the poker table of the socio-sexual market place & make bets & authorize promises in the hundreds of thousands in reproductive costs when they can only actually back up a few pennies worth of responsibility. If women DON'T take responsibility for a authoritative decision, then they DON'T have equal authority/rights to the guys that do take responsibilities seriously, and men usually have to to get a stable relationship with a good woman for society to exist. This is why traditional gender roles are good because it facilitates that.

Show me a man that wants to take something away from women, and I'll show you 100s of women who will vote to take away by force from men. Show me one time a women enforces rights through force, and I'll show you all of civilisation where men enforces rights through force. Therefore men who enforce laws/regulations and rights there is therefore a massive power differential between men and women, power only works because of the male-domination and intellectuals of ideological ideas is what determines their willingness to enforce or not to enforce the politics (culture precedes politics, ideological ideas direction controls culture).

"Any society that negates the role of the father in the voluntarily marriage contract from decent civilization building men and replaces it with a involuntary centralized welfare state will not remain civilized for long."

Firstly have a right-wing Plan of Action:

1. Establish a formal political group or enclave, particularly elsewhere in Europe or northeast Asia. That will have a formalized power center to grow membership through and create a new intellectual elite. Seek foreign allies with same goals for creating a global fraternity.

2. Design a striking aesthetics, logo/symbol, typeface and uniform, initiation ritual, command structure, clear nomenclature, efficient organisation, like traditions and standards have to be strictly maintained.

3. Generate funds through frequent fundraising. Subscription online magazines and podcast, outside day jobs in the host city, sponsorships, rumble/odysee/youtube channel, funds gathered from such events.

4. Generate agitprop and stir up controversy. Publicity stunts, post campaign bits on social media, release press releases if possible before and after publicity stunts to the media because of its controversy.

5. Initial group of elites must be established at the beginning, any new members must be vetted and vouched for by many members extensively. Strict control over internal communication.

6. Non-members but who are subscribers can be brought into the fold to help with institutional capture. Can be headhunted or recruited for planting the seeds for the dedicated elite to make their move. Push the tradition and standards to be upheld by the rest of society by such elite and institutional capture membership men.

7. Push these men of our elite intellectuals and leaders into political organisation for a mainstream party and get them elected into office.

In the US women could have had the vote in the 1870s, but the Suffragists knew it would require women to shoulder the same responsibilities as men, and with huge numbers of wounded Civil War veterans walking around, they didn't want that. The Suffragettes (who were beyond military age) were also demanding the vote. Wilson and the Progressives gave the Suffragette leadership the vote because men weren't supporting their political agenda. They did not demand women take up equal responsibilities. The feminists together with the progressives both agreed not to give women less responsibilities or duties.

In England during WW1 the White Feather Girls would hand any apparently able-bodied man a white feather (symbol of cowardice) they found who was not in uniform. That included farmers, munitions factory workers, ship builders and disabled veterans. None of these women ever served a second in the battlefield or nursing the many casualties, and they deprived the Empire of skilled labor when they needed it.

In Switzerland they gave women the vote in 1975, yet while all, male Switzers are still required to serve in the military, women recently voted to continue their exemption to that requirement,
Feminist has always been about gaining privileges and shirking responsibilities.

Feminist has always been about gaining privileges and shirking responsibilities. That idea of responsibilities and duties are necessary for the proper functioning of society including defense against foreign enemies, is never going away. And enforcement of our rights literally depends on men. The enforcement arms are military and police. Which are 95%+ male dominated. Women always rely on men to use force to protect their rights and way of life.

Men are also 95%+ behind building and maintaining infrastructure. Without which there wouldn't be any comfortable air conditioned environments for women to do the easy desk work orientated jobs.

So rather than men feeling threatened its the other way around, women are not doing as much as men are and living life on easy mode. Along with abortion rights which give women the right to terminate life without the fathers consent. That's less rights for men, and more for women. Again a one way street that supports women over men. Basically what I'm suggesting is that women don't do nearly as much laborious, difficulty, dangerous or menial tasks as men do and women rely on men for their defense against other men, so basically for survival... And whether they get to keep their rights or not. Women are STILL dependent on men for the most part.

Feminism is a luxury of highly developed civilization. It cannot exist outside of that. It must rely on the charity, assertiveness and aggression by males for defense and also for it to survive and spread around to other women. It literally cannot exist in a survival group or soldier group. But most importantly it cannot coexist (with maximum rights and zero responsibilities) with what is a Patriarchal society which we still live in and cannot possibly live without because we need responsibilities and duties (especially for enforcement of rights and protection) for society to even exist in the first place.

"Rights aren't rights if someone can take them away. They're privileges. That's all we've ever had in this country is a bill of temporary privileges."-George Carlin