Posts | ||
---|---|---|
The LHC | Locked | |
Thread Options | 1 2 | |
Oct 6 2008 Anchor | ||
Do you think that the LHC at CERN will creat a micro singularity? do you think that it will cause an apocolypse? |
||
|
Oct 6 2008 Anchor | |
Any black hole would evaporate via Hawking radiation in an instant. This will happen, a lot. This happens in our atmosphere, a lot. The formation of stable black holes requires a change in the Standard Model to dismiss Hawking radiation, but the problem then becomes with our calculations of the formation of black holes in which the LHC has no quality over the atmosphere to favor the formation. To induce annihilation the black holes need to accumulate more particles to form greater mass and exponentially increase in scale. However, for 4.5 Billion years this has yet to occur, and so the worst consideration is we're off on the enormously small mass of those black holes and we add an insignificant amount to the mass currently in our core, not apparently devouring it. |
||
Oct 6 2008 Anchor | ||
im not a phyisist, just a conspiracy theorist... `.` nice paragraph |
||
Oct 7 2008 Anchor | ||
Apparently the whole mass of earth doesnt suffice to form a stable black hole anyway. So no worrys there :o |
||
Oct 9 2008 Anchor | ||
Black hole can only appear when a sun is destroyed. |
||
|
Oct 9 2008 Anchor | |
In the strictest sense, yes, in the Standard Model of physics the black hole requires the collapse of a massive celestial body. This does not require a star, but stars are thus far the most massive objects in our cosmos and have a method to degenerate and cause collapse in one of two ways: either absorb much more mass or lose a large portion of current mass, which is predictable due to gravitational welling and fusion. However, that is in the Standard Model alone, and when we introduce particle physics, quantum mechanics, etc., the rules change significantly and black holes, as I noted, should form and evaporate constantly around us. We're attempting to observe this phenomenon at the LHC, indirectly due to the formation of theoretical particles. |
||
Oct 9 2008 Anchor | ||
what about antimatter/dark matter |
||
|
Oct 9 2008 Anchor | |
All very much a portion of the same unifying theories of physics: black holes, anti-matter, dark matter, etc., and confirmations on how these come into existence, interact now, and similar. Though I suppose I don't quite understand your question? Edited by: Vangor |
||
Oct 9 2008 Anchor | ||
me niether. |
||
|
Oct 11 2008 Anchor | |
Maybe another important question to discuss is, if we can open the stargates with the LHC. Does it finally give us the microenergy needed to communicate with alien civilisations and will they replace our cranium with a licorice snake? Edited by: SinKing |
||
Oct 11 2008 Anchor | ||
For the nervous persons here. |
||
|
Oct 11 2008 Anchor | |
LOL though i was expecting that. -- "I may not know anything but at least I am smarter then 90% of the people out there." I just killed another form topic just by posting in it "It does not smell like it is going to kill me"-My Brother |
||
|
Oct 11 2008 Anchor | |
I always love that. Sadly the nerd in me rebels and says "you wouldn't see a black hole, nor would it expand in such a fashion, nor this or that!" |
||
|
Oct 12 2008 Anchor | |
Yeah, the same goes for all those sci-fi stories where a blackhole appears in somebody's backard. If it were there, in fact, they wouldn't. Neither would their lawn, their house, or anybody witness such an event, as by that time you are already sucked into the void and compressed to ultralinear energy. Edited by: SinKing |
||
|
Oct 13 2008 Anchor | |
Thats actually the first time ive seen that ... LOL |
||
Oct 14 2008 Anchor | ||
lol that WAS funny, and apearantly impossible |
||
Oct 16 2008 Anchor | ||
yes thats true
I dont think that is cause in an apocolypse, the LHC can not produce enough energy to create a black hole or something else. |
||
|
Oct 16 2008 Anchor | |
|
Oct 16 2008 Anchor | |
Unlike you jiffy I have destroyed countless worlds quite easily. --
|
||
Oct 16 2008 Anchor | ||
Fusion is just the opposite of fission. no big deal |
||
|
Oct 16 2008 Anchor | |
|
||
Oct 16 2008 Anchor | ||
The LHC is a massive particle collider and CERN is the research center that runs it. They both were heavily involved in the book, angels and demons, by the author of the davinci code, who's name i cant recall. Edited by: Robots! |
||
|
Oct 16 2008 Anchor | |
|
Oct 16 2008 Anchor | |
|
Oct 16 2008 Anchor | |
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.