Posts | ||
---|---|---|
Battle for Middle Earth 2 | Locked | |
Thread Options | ||
|
Feb 18 2006 Anchor | |
demo's been out for awhile now and i like it despite some total disobedient ai from units discuss. -- < insert subject games here >
|
||
|
Feb 18 2006 Anchor | |
Its kinda horrible in my opinion, a failed copy of Warcraft3, with like you said shitty AI, and hard game play and basically no relavance to LOTR, and im usally a fan of their games. |
||
|
Feb 18 2006 Anchor | |
I'd hardly describe it as a copy of Wc3 - it's basically BfME, based on the war in the north from the novels (with a bit of liberal interpretation) - a large part of the features were requested by the community (such as wall building and independent structures). The demo doesn't really reflect the final product very well. It's not a bad game when it comes down to it, but at the moment, multiplayer is a little off - hopefully that'll be fixed right up by the release. |
||
|
Mar 1 2006 Anchor | |
Did you guys see Moddb.com this mod?
|
||
|
Mar 1 2006 Anchor | |
took me a couple days to dl edit: first one was fun tho, specially in multiplayer Edited by: Tomato-Killer --
|
||
|
Mar 20 2006 Anchor | |
What is the model that you currently have? Edited by: Baza |
||
Mar 20 2006 Anchor | ||
Don't base your entire opinion of a game off of two people, Baza. If that was the case, then no one would like any game in the industry. Everyone has something to gripe about, but in this case, try the demo first before forming an opinion. That's all I can recommend. -- "He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster." |
||
|
Mar 20 2006 Anchor | |
I'd mostly ignore it, the big hitters for BfME II are likely to include Rise of Rome in their ranks, but I'm hardly bothered about the game being more faithful to the limited book material |
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.