it is fact... trust me...
All there evidence is aimed at breaking down modern science and moving it back to the dark ages
Science is the process of understanding the world by natural means, thats the whole point...
all ID does is take a non answer and replace it with another non-answer... how did life form, by a creator, everything needs a creator.... then thhe next logical step is, who created that creator, and who that one, and who that one...
see what i mean
ID is a waste of everyones time, as all religion is, and it should be purged from this planet or we dont deserve the right to go out to the stars...
ermm i dont want to seem disrespectful but
the ultimate creator was the big bang.And then you ask what created the big bang and the answer is nothing. Time didint exist before the big bang so time could not have passed in order to the big bang to start.That leaves us with the conclusion that the big bang has always existed, and always started at the big bang so therefore we know it all started with the big bang BANG!
just a little thing, The THEORY of evolution states that order comes from chaos evenutally (random amino acids combine to make protines those to make single celled organisms and so on), but the proven LAW of entropy states that all systems go from order to chaos unless energy is put into the system to counter act it. and as organisms got more complex more energy would be needed to be input into the organism. Also look up irreducible complexity. And most examples of evolution are actually examples of natural selection not evolution. There has been no proof ever of evolution, not even the fossil records prove it. The fossil records don't show the "tree of life" that darwin imagined, it's more like a lawn of life with a great many blades of grass. Oh by the way, did you know that darwin's evolution also says that white people are the highest form of man, followed by asians, blacks and then australians. Look it up, it's the second less well known part of his paper. And all the dating methods are inaccurate and based on assumptions about when time began. even tho if the world was as old as "science" says, the most basic protiens still would have taken billions of years to form randomly, by accident, and against the law of entropy. It's not about evolution vs intelligent design, it's about getting people to look at the real science (not just what the media and textbooks feed them cuz there are a great many mistakes and known frauds amoung that information) and then to make a choice for themselves whether or not they can still follow the religion of evolution.
the law of entropy HAS NOTHING to do with evolution. All EVOLUTION is is change over time, it has NOTHING to do with entropy, which has more to do with the universe at its full scale than stuff at a tiny scale...
and for the lvoe of crumb cake
EVOLUTION IS NOT A ******* RELIGION
and ID HAS NO EVIDENCE to prove it, all it does is waste peoples money.
If u want to prove evolution wrong
LEARN WHAT EVOLUTION IS...
unless the big bang was crated by an other universe. That would happen when that universes black holes sucked up all the matter in the universe and it was all pushed out in a big bang. But that however does not work together with kvasars becouse a kvasar supposidly occurs when a black hole gets filled up and ionized gas shots out for lightyears.
These are the things that keep me up at night.
P.S. this was supposed to be a response to my old comment
well there are ways to for a universe to come into existance all on its own. There is a way that a quantum particle can spring into existance all on its own and then disapear again. It hapens all the time on a scale that is almost to small to imagine. There is another factor called expansion that allows one to expand exponentially, and guess how much energy is released... enough for a universe. Thats right, a universe can spring up from nothing randomly. And its all in the math.
The odds are just insanely insanely low. But the best part, the coolest part is that it has a higher chance if a universe expands to a maasive size. So one theory is that our unverse has apeared in the remnants of an older universe. And again the math is in favour for it.
Cool no?
the math for a theory that can't be proven in any way shape or form. and ID doesn't take modern science and try to take it back to the dark ages, it's trying to get the truth out there. Why do science texts books have diagrams and experiments that they scientific community has known to be either wrong or frauds. And about religion, you show me one person who has had their life completely changed for the better, who was a drunk or a prostitute, or an abuser, or murderer, by the religion of atheism, and I will show you thousands and thousands of people who have been by theology.
bored... very very bored....
Wow
Deff way to bored
funny but thats your opinion not fact
it is fact... trust me...
All there evidence is aimed at breaking down modern science and moving it back to the dark ages
Science is the process of understanding the world by natural means, thats the whole point...
all ID does is take a non answer and replace it with another non-answer... how did life form, by a creator, everything needs a creator.... then thhe next logical step is, who created that creator, and who that one, and who that one...
see what i mean
ID is a waste of everyones time, as all religion is, and it should be purged from this planet or we dont deserve the right to go out to the stars...
ermm i dont want to seem disrespectful but
the ultimate creator was the big bang.And then you ask what created the big bang and the answer is nothing. Time didint exist before the big bang so time could not have passed in order to the big bang to start.That leaves us with the conclusion that the big bang has always existed, and always started at the big bang so therefore we know it all started with the big bang BANG!
just a little thing, The THEORY of evolution states that order comes from chaos evenutally (random amino acids combine to make protines those to make single celled organisms and so on), but the proven LAW of entropy states that all systems go from order to chaos unless energy is put into the system to counter act it. and as organisms got more complex more energy would be needed to be input into the organism. Also look up irreducible complexity. And most examples of evolution are actually examples of natural selection not evolution. There has been no proof ever of evolution, not even the fossil records prove it. The fossil records don't show the "tree of life" that darwin imagined, it's more like a lawn of life with a great many blades of grass. Oh by the way, did you know that darwin's evolution also says that white people are the highest form of man, followed by asians, blacks and then australians. Look it up, it's the second less well known part of his paper. And all the dating methods are inaccurate and based on assumptions about when time began. even tho if the world was as old as "science" says, the most basic protiens still would have taken billions of years to form randomly, by accident, and against the law of entropy. It's not about evolution vs intelligent design, it's about getting people to look at the real science (not just what the media and textbooks feed them cuz there are a great many mistakes and known frauds amoung that information) and then to make a choice for themselves whether or not they can still follow the religion of evolution.
the law of entropy HAS NOTHING to do with evolution. All EVOLUTION is is change over time, it has NOTHING to do with entropy, which has more to do with the universe at its full scale than stuff at a tiny scale...
and for the lvoe of crumb cake
EVOLUTION IS NOT A ******* RELIGION
and ID HAS NO EVIDENCE to prove it, all it does is waste peoples money.
If u want to prove evolution wrong
LEARN WHAT EVOLUTION IS...
Amen brother! as the good lords book says, uh... thou shall step on the moon?
I have seen a lot of random things before, but this just makes me say: WTF?
lol, i was in a bit of a mood after watching 2 many create-tard videos lol
unless the big bang was crated by an other universe. That would happen when that universes black holes sucked up all the matter in the universe and it was all pushed out in a big bang. But that however does not work together with kvasars becouse a kvasar supposidly occurs when a black hole gets filled up and ionized gas shots out for lightyears.
These are the things that keep me up at night.
P.S. this was supposed to be a response to my old comment
well there are ways to for a universe to come into existance all on its own. There is a way that a quantum particle can spring into existance all on its own and then disapear again. It hapens all the time on a scale that is almost to small to imagine. There is another factor called expansion that allows one to expand exponentially, and guess how much energy is released... enough for a universe. Thats right, a universe can spring up from nothing randomly. And its all in the math.
The odds are just insanely insanely low. But the best part, the coolest part is that it has a higher chance if a universe expands to a maasive size. So one theory is that our unverse has apeared in the remnants of an older universe. And again the math is in favour for it.
Cool no?
didin't know that.I lern something new every day.
BTW BARNAY IZ A REALZ DINOZAUR!!
the math for a theory that can't be proven in any way shape or form. and ID doesn't take modern science and try to take it back to the dark ages, it's trying to get the truth out there. Why do science texts books have diagrams and experiments that they scientific community has known to be either wrong or frauds. And about religion, you show me one person who has had their life completely changed for the better, who was a drunk or a prostitute, or an abuser, or murderer, by the religion of atheism, and I will show you thousands and thousands of people who have been by theology.