This member has provided no bio about themself...

Comment History
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

A nuclear strike for a abrams tank ? HEllO thats a TYP 59D!!!!!! The Abrams is special optimized too destroy these tanks -.- his armor can absorb the kinetic power of THESE tanks without problems.His weakness lies in asymetric warfare or RPG 22 or better.Also roadbombs can stop him but no simple tanks like Type 59 or 89 on this mod...First of your arguments i 100% agree its always harder too fight on the soil of an other country.And third BK mod is famous because on ww2 you needed 5 sherman or more for 1 tiger thats fact and also i think you will need more than 3 typ 59D too destroy 1 Abrams.

Good karma0 votes
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

TEXT:
Us Budget $ 692,000,000,000,000
China Budget $ 100,000,000,000,000
1,500,000 soldiers Us
Chinese soldiers 2,300,000
that means,
1 soldier of the Chinese may have a (theoretically) military technological benefit of $ 43,478,260.87.
1 soldier of Americans, however, can have a (theoretically) military technological benefit of $ 461,333,333.30
This results in:
100% = $ 461,333,333.30
? = $ 43,478,260.87
ERGO: 9.42447 .. %
This Means That the probability that china is able to win a war against United States is by 9-10 percent.
What i want to say with that is fact that the balancing of your Modern Combat mod is heavy **** ...I mean i played the game in the conquest mod and thought wow i ve got 3 abrams nice i will win( against normal Ki...i lost against 5 Typ 59 D and one Ztz tank.. are you kidding me????? In real they would lose none- max. one tank ^^I really like your work and i have a great opinion of the modding team, good work guys on modelling...etc. but you can`t cause that a type 59D Chinese tank can damadge a M1A1 Abrams tank ... in reality, impossible =) Your mod would be so great!! Problem: Those balancing the PLA should have his manpower and the US the better technologie..So my suggestion guys make this mod more like Blitzkrieg mod (USA = Axis) power (China = U.S.) power, means Abrams is like king tiger - Typ 59D= Sherman for example. Then it would be a real grat and realsitic Modern Combat mod, in time the balancing is pure **** and provocation for myself and many of the other players.

Good karma-2 votes
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

The hardcore mode hase verry nice new upgrades and you can build more of the powerful tanks thats nice but it dont make sense too buy them because they are verry bad( a RPG team easily take them down, the PLA Pak also 1 0r 2 hits and the range is huge you cant setback your tanks).The ZTZ or ABrams tanks cost verry mutch but dont have a chance on hardcore mode.Stryker and LAVS are down with 1 hit also the special forces units are verry bad (only the airborne on the US doctrine and the new PLA special forces are good units the marine airborne troops are wasted money^^), its unplayable vs PC ( i think on multiplayer the balance is better)but on ki mode no chance it only nervs ^^.

I also want too say the normal mode is verry balanced and nice too play it really makes fun nice work :D.

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

Hello
this mod is unplayable vs ki on conquer mode you cant win.Also i think the PLA pak is too strong and has too mutch range (conquer mode) a abrams tusk cost 1000 credits and is with 2 or 3 shots down and also can be damage by the PLA flaktanks main gun wtf ???

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

thank you verry mutch that was the problem its really easy too fix ^^

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

hello,
My friend has a huge problem with modern combat mod since 3 weeks.If he try too start a multiplayer match the game closed down with a crash report always he klicked on multiplayer button in the game single player works without problems.I tried too reinstall the whole game (use steam version),install latest patch (1.016), new driver for graphic card but always same problem.I had the same problem too but after 2 days the multiplayer does work again dont know whats the problem please help me.

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ European Warfare : Napoleonica

IS this mod dead or alive ???

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

Hello,
I startet modern combat(full installer 1.015) klicked on multiplayer an become a crash report( game ends)whats the problem?

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

Hey guys
I downloaded the full installer 1.015 but the game wont start?I use COH on the new steam version.Shell i install the mod in the COH or the COH RELAUNCH folder?

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

the navy seals dont wear boonies is this a bug ?

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ The long awaited Patch 1.014!

I dont use the steam version dot know how tooo install...

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ The long awaited Patch 1.014!

Hey guys can you explain me how i install the patch 1.014 manuell it doesnt works ^^

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Campaign Commander

THanks for the fast answer :)

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Campaign Commander

hey nice mod:)).Ive a question how i can turn the popcap higher than 9 i dont find the XML doc for max buildable units can you give me an answer please.

Good karma0 votes
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

Thanks for answer :D.The hardcore mode should be a realistic variant of the game right? I like this mode respect guys.But i think it it would be preferable if the PLA have mutch cheaper tanks=more of these units and the US vehicles should be mutch more effective(technologie stand is mutch higher..)like Udssr vs german Wehrmacht.I hope i do not tread on you XD.

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

That sounds fair but the PLA have mutch more tanks for all situations and the abrams is the only heavy thing(tank) on the US side.I mean striker and blank are wasted money because they have not enough range.Could you test the game balance with striker or blank with same range as the PLA anti tank cannon?(Sorry my english is not perfect XD).

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

Hey öhm Abrams accuracy is verry bad in 7 of 10 shots he miss wtf!!.PLA typ 89 is much better as Abrams and have higher range thats really bad one shot and Abrams is a burning wreck hope you will fix this....

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

hey i tested the mod with patch 03 fazit: something is better mutch is to make better the US already have no chance in tank battles because they have no tanks Abrams is no option because you cant build it... stryker is no tank and bradley is anti infantrie... the PLA PAk already same **** with fu... long range artillerie is mutch better because its not longer so strong the new skins and the anti tank for airborne is nice.The Abrams has an faster tower and hits better but it could be a little bit stronger because its the only option to win a tank battle with an vehicle.Stryke hmmm biggest **** ever sorry couldnt be friend with this unit it only sucks anti tank gun is LOW hitpoints are low all is low only the shoot distance is good but cant beat the overpowered PAK.If you play vs pc this mod is only nerving and boring.ALL in ALL its fine with mutch to make better.

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

THank you verry verry mutch for this new patch yet the mod is verry nice and balanced the new helmet and protections are great its not longer cold war its modern combat maybe with the next patch they will look like in MW3? :D verry nice.

Good karma-2 votes
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

IS this vietnam or todays war ? Look like US are Vietnam age

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

Why does the PLA have more artillerie as the US i wont believe it but this game sucks the US are bad dont have enough variants of weapons and the PLA are over and over and overpowered -.-

Good karma-4 votes
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

Sorry guys the Abrams is the same **** unit as Stryker.Stryker is no vehicle to fight vs tanks but its ingame the only cheap option.The Abrams look verry nice good work guys but his balancing is verry bad the tower moves to slow the damage to low and ZTZ is also faster and wins all the time.Abrams cant be build on tech3 house thats also bad and he cost verry mutch.One question: is this the Abrams version with an 105mm main gun or the 120mm gun as the leopard a2?One other problem i think is that the PAK from the PLA has too mutch power and kills the Abrams too fast.I think thats little problems and easy too fix with an patch :-)

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

Yes and stryker is in real mutch better as ingame (resistent for RPG because of the extra technologie armour for close area battle) and abrams is with the exception of leopard2/A6 the best tank on this planet.ZTZ and Typ 96 are next generation tanks of the China forces but never good enough too beat an Abrams or an ABRAMS TUSK -.-

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

HWy does the PLA have TYP 96 gun realased 1995 and the US M4 Carbine the US already use m416 or SCRA-H bzw. ACR and dont answer with regular US troops use M4 because regular PLA troops dont use Typ 95 ok they have this upgrade but why does the us dont have an weapons upgrade or ceramic armor upgrade would be verry nice.ALL IN ALL this mod is verry good

Good karma-4 votes
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

The new patch is nice but wtf barrett cal. 50 dont shoot into tanks AHHH not really ?? AND why the PLA have 3 nice tanks ztz type 96 and type 89 and the US only have ABrams one Abrams that is soo ***** *** ahhhhh.please give the US more good tanks or 2 Abrams PLEEAASSEEEE

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

Ok Ok fine you said balance but the PLA have much more Unit variations, tanks, airtrikes, PAk 86 overpowered etc...thats all verry cool and detailed units nice work but whats with the US army forces?? to beginn of a game the US can rush with hmmvee and thats all PLA build one tank and all is lost because the US dont have a good tank to build. Stryker is fail all the time ENGINE DAMAGE.......his main gun power is also not good and the Bradley cost verry mutch and is only verry good vs infantry, jewelin troops really nice units but they dont come to shoot theyr rockets because of PLA overpowered snipers knocked them out.WHy the PLA have mutch more units as the USA? I think its mutch harder to play with US and hope you can fix this to create a better game experience :-)

Good karma+2 votes
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

Hello

WHats with the PLA PAk86 i think that is a really unreal **** because you need mutch hits with ABRAMS to get it down O_O so unrealistic one hit with tank and it must be destroyed or the crew is dead.You never kill a modern tank with a WW2 Pak -.- please make it cheaper take the damage level down and let it be destroyed with one hit from abrams and 3 hits from stryker.All in All a really nice MOD :D

Good karma+1 vote
Reclaimerable
Reclaimerable - - 28 comments @ Company of Heroes: Modern Combat

Verry nice mod really good work!!

But i have Some suggestions:
THE PLA have mutch middle heavy tanks and the USA only Stryker and Bradley i think thats verry bad because the PLA can build mutch more tanks zb.: Typ 89 heavy tank,Typ 96 heavy tank and the ZTZ 99 A1 verry heavy tank.The USA only have Abrams(1 Abrams) i think thats verry unfair and boring.
Next the A-10 Thunderbolt is too low and you have no chance on tis fraction because you only can build stryker and bradley and the Airborne Troops cant use special attacks like a AT-4 or an weapon upgrade.

The balancing is good but with the US fraction is mutch harder too win because they dont have enough tank variants.I hope i can help you with this ideas do make a mutch better game experience.

Good karma+5 votes