This member has provided no bio about themself...
Would be cool.
When the main menu is shown there's a delay before I can press any button, like a threading issue or something.
The character creator flickers a lot whenever I press something.
You can't cancel the character creator.
When selecting character and game mode I can't see what I have chosen, like, if I press the empty "GAME" field and choose single player, the field remains empty but I can still continue
The text when choosing character or game is blurry, might have something to do with the fact that I'm using a 4k monitor and I have it set at 125% to make things easier to read.
The wind resistance when jumping is insane, you lose vertical speed incredibly quickly.
Escape closes the chat and it can't be opened again.
This looks amazing.
Just a question though, about the replay system, is it only for multiplayer or can you after finishing any battle in the campaign just view replay to see for example why you lost or why one enemy seemed immortal?
With the now seemingly improved AI, giving orders is more important, so it would be really useful to see just how all your men reacted after a certain order was given.
Wow, this IS a good idea, rare these days.
Also, will offline LAN be possible?
I ask because there are times you can connect to other PCs without having access to internet (like at school).
Could you post a link to images of the weapons?
I want to know what the pack gives but I don't want to download it until I do.
What was the code now again... MaxSimultaneousof?
Time to remove all those again.
Also, the rendering and lighting makes it look like it came from diablo 2.
Will invading black march be extremely hard/almost impossible?
Oh... I have thought like forever that this wasn't even a real thing since there were no download links nor any gameplay videos.
I have been watching this for at least a year or so...
You really should mention that fact that you can download the game somewhere, maybe put up something in the download-section.
I sort of feel responsible for not saying "Great work on the mod!" when he released.
>That still gives none of you any right to criticize someone's work because you would not want someone to do the same to you.
>..., so just stop being so judgemental
>... I respect people's opinions, but not offensive ones that are against this mod
My critique of the author even considering modelling this ugly thing isn't justified?
We're all judgemental, including you.
>Next time think before you judge someone else's hard work that they made their own time for in order to provide us with entertainment.
The fact that they upload this means they like hearing people say good things about it, for what reason other than to gain notoriety or to satisfy selfish desires to give people "free" things would you do anything without getting paid?
What I mean is that what we (the consumers) say actually matters in some way, and thus I can only hope that my message gets across and they spend less time on baby carriers and more on... Something else.
>Just because you all may not find it to your liking doesn't mean you should disrespect it.
If I don't like a person's opinions then I don't respect their opinions, and thus I don't respect them either.
Also, where was any disrespectful discussions about this baby carrier taking place?
I say this looks like **** not because the author is bad, on the contrary, if someone made a ****** baby carrier for this mod I would think "Oh, good, nobody wasted talent on that".
>those arguments are not valid
No, my arguments for why it's a baby carrier are as follows:
The dreadknight has a harness that is reminiscent of those you use to keep children safe (in cars and such).
That it's attached to the front of a humanoid vehicle (two arms, two legs).
Just the harness on anything else would make it look like a roller-coaster seat.
>To be honest they are nothing like baby carriers.
And the argument for that is?
The fact that SoB is fully attached and the dreadknight isn't and also that SoB has no armour IS a good enough of a reason to differentiate between them.
The SoB strap people into those - exposing them to enemy fire - as punishment to allow those condemned to repent.
The gray knights do that for no explainable reason.
I would not call it a baby carrier if the gray knight wasn't wearing armor and he was permanently attached, as long as the harness didn't look like a baby carrier.
>The driver on the dreadknight on the other side still needs to show himself enough to be promoted to a dreadnought
Wait, what? Dreadknights are better than dreadnaughts, dreadknights can go up against greater daemons. And what do you mean be "promoted"? Or are you implying the grey knights use the dreadknights because they like to show off? Because that would be retarded.
Oh, and I don't disrespect, this is a good looking retarded and ugly thing, shame the author spent time on this, but no matter how well you implement a ****** idea and concept it still won't be good.
"******" in the sense that it's not awe-inspiring or interesting, it's fun to laugh at and that's about it.
The person in the penitent engine isn't wearing armour, and is completely attached.
Besides, it's the SoB, it's not strange for them to have retarded vehicles (organ-artillery amongst other things).
"The repentant Heretic is hard-wired into the front of the war engine, and unlike Space Marine Dreadnoughts, which are fully enclosed, the penitent sinner is fully exposed to enemy attack, relying only upon the Emperor' judgement to keep them safe or take their life." - wh4kwikia
I know it's a wikia, but still, it makes sense.
However, the baby carrier does not.
Nice to see progress!
I had this long message, but I think only my final point is important:
"My point is not to say that sjws are retarded or right, well, they are retarded, but so are the people saying they they're retarded, but rather, that arguing about the state of society is stupid while arguing about the arguments about the state of society is not."
It's the actual link itself, if I see a small link I assume it's unimportant or advertisement, like, a link to a friend's blog or something like that.
And that was my friend's fault... I should seriously stop commenting the second something goes wrong...
Now i'm getting desyncs all the time, like, at 0 seconds into the game.
Oh, downloaded the patch...
You really should make the patch more obvious for people who have difficulty finding things like me.
I encounter serious errors, what do?
I must say, there's too much cavalry, like, every tournament is just like normal mount and blade, which is a shame.
It's a cool mod, but there are no "ideas", like, there's the obvious "mount and blade with vikings" but what about raiding coastal and neutral cities? Or what about the fact that there were no kings with supreme power? Or the fact that there were no stirrups so you couldn't use both hands for weapons on horseback?
I've been to... Wait, do you mean Netherlands in Europe or do you mean whatever the "Kingdom of Netherlands" is? Because let me tell you, there are no mountains along the coast in the Netherlands in Europe. What did you even mean by "the Dutch coast"?
Shouldn't the option/choice depend on the governments stance on intervention? If the government repair broken factories and homes some people will be (for some reason) ******.
Oh, and 5% of the population is like 1.7 million people if we go by google's population of California 2000, which is a bit much.
There is already press rights, and free press is part of that. Expanding on "press rights" could be done, but I think it's better to fix what's broken instead of adding features and then fixing them.
Compulsory church attendance. Since that was, like, a thing.
Possibly compulsory school attendance, not too sure about that one though.
It keeps desyncing, why? Are there any fixes?
inb4 kebab removal.