This member has provided no bio about themself...

Comment History
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Natural law

I personally think you don't believe in idealism because you haven't been subjected to that kind of information through logic, common sense or experience. Higher idealism is the eternal laws of nature. Soul is just inherent traits and the desire and inclination for survival imprinted upon us by nature.
The Oera Linda is a naturalistic explanation as to why we behave according to our blood, the inherent characteristics innately are part of the soul. The other books on the topic Revelations of the Eternal Laws of Nature by Jost Turner, Manu For the Man to Come by Miguel Serrano, Eternal Front by Anton Holzner, and The German Faith Movement by Jakob Wilhelm Hauer. Soul is the various levels of expression of personhood, the blood forms that great destiny into that person as the following elements: individual, family, gender, ethnic, racial and human truths. This is obvious from any cursory glance at those readings and including The Next Leap by Ironmarch. It's obvious to me that realities existence is really based on consciousness. It is a projection of a great cosmic will which creates social order. Things like the law of personality/leadership, fight or struggle, hierarchy/pecking order, territory, biological integrity, social darwinism/survival of the fittest, and motherhood.

Also we are being physically replaced by foreign invading people and religions. Firstly by overwhelming taking over communities, towns, cities, neighborhoods by foreign people and this is making us all uncomfortable and less willing to reproduce. If different groups or cliques clash with our identity then they will cause people to become more apprehensive about having children. There's less safe neighborhoods and more people that outnumber who with different religious traditions and interests, you won't feel as happy when your environment overwhelmed by foreign religion and people.

Next argument is direct competition over scarce resources or ecological niche. We find that more and more people will claim their interests are preferred and will undermine the host cultures niche or interests. So physically less money and opportunity for your own people as foreign people and religions change the government and market to suit their own people. The more opportunities are taken by foreigners then the less of resources there are allowed to be utilised by our people.

Thirdly, hybridization. We are being mixed out of existence by coupling between different racial groups. You don't get a white person or black out of a mixed coupling, but rather a mixed race person that has less qualities of both. Weakening the connection to soil, faith and folk. They usually identify with the most collectivist and aggressive culture rather than both of their lineages. So one has to lose. That usually means you get less of both races around and more of invading culture in our case. So hyrbidazation weakens the collective effort to preserve western civilisation and western ethnic culture.

Lastly predation, where through crime and vendetta physically attack our people. Which is born out in the data that human traffickers and gangs target many other ethnic, racial and law abiding peoples. These are the arguments laid out by Greg Johnson in his books, particularly his last few. Like The White Nationalist Manifesto.

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ The Political Spectrum - Left-wing Vs Right-wing

In the US women could have had the vote in the 1870s, but the Suffragists knew it would require women to shoulder the same responsibilities as men, and with huge numbers of wounded Civil War veterans walking around, they didn't want that. The Suffragettes (who were beyond military age) were also demanding the vote. Wilson and the Progressives gave the Suffragette leadership the vote because men weren't supporting their political agenda. They did not demand women take up equal responsibilities. The feminists together with the progressives both agreed not to give women less responsibilities or duties.

In England during WW1 the White Feather Girls would hand any apparently able-bodied man a white feather (symbol of cowardice) they found who was not in uniform. That included farmers, munitions factory workers, ship builders and disabled veterans. None of these women ever served a second in the battlefield or nursing the many casualties, and they deprived the Empire of skilled labor when they needed it.

In Switzerland they gave women the vote in 1975, yet while all, male Switzers are still required to serve in the military, women recently voted to continue their exemption to that requirement,
Feminist has always been about gaining privileges and shirking responsibilities.

Feminist has always been about gaining privileges and shirking responsibilities. That idea of responsibilities and duties are necessary for the proper functioning of society including defense against foreign enemies, is never going away. And enforcement of our rights literally depends on men. The enforcement arms are military and police. Which are 95%+ male dominated. Women always rely on men to use force to protect their rights and way of life.

Men are also 95%+ behind building and maintaining infrastructure. Without which there wouldn't be any comfortable air conditioned environments for women to do the easy desk work orientated jobs.

So rather than men feeling threatened its the other way around, women are not doing as much as men are and living life on easy mode. Along with abortion rights which give women the right to terminate life without the fathers consent. That's less rights for men, and more for women. Again a one way street that supports women over men. Basically what I'm suggesting is that women don't do nearly as much laborious, difficulty, dangerous or menial tasks as men do and women rely on men for their defense against other men, so basically for survival... And whether they get to keep their rights or not. Women are STILL dependent on men for the most part.

Feminism is a luxury of highly developed civilization. It cannot exist outside of that. It must rely on the charity, assertiveness and aggression by males for defense and also for it to survive and spread around to other women. It literally cannot exist in a survival group or soldier group. But most importantly it cannot coexist (with maximum rights and zero responsibilities) with what is a Patriarchal society which we still live in and cannot possibly live without because we need responsibilities and duties (especially for enforcement of rights and protection) for society to even exist in the first place.

"Rights aren't rights if someone can take them away. They're privileges. That's all we've ever had in this country is a bill of temporary privileges."-George Carlin

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ [Braving Ruin] Know Your Place

The fascist state is not reactionary but revolutionary, because it anticipates the solutions to universal problems that arise elsewhere. These are divisions caused by political parties, usurpation of power by parliaments, the irresponsibility of assemblies, the disputes of trade unions, and the need of order, discipline, and morality. This is why I'm not against a authoritarian state on principle.

Freedom isn't always good. Sometimes doing something because you can is bad for somebody else (exploitation by theft, usury, rent), or bad for yourself (porn, big macs, junk food, junk television, addictions e.t.c.) giving people freedom to do those things is just going to give people the right to do bad things to others or themselves, to take advantage of others people's trust or pleasure oneself at the expense of ones health is clearly not suddenly moral or useful just because its "muh freedom".

Good karma+2 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Brutal Doom

Brutal Doom v22 Beta 2, ready for download: Mediafire.com

Good karma+4 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Half-life 25th Anniversary Update

Counter Strike 1 & Condition Zero and Team Fortress - cant even start these!

Deleted scenes, DoD, Ricochet, Blue Shift, Opposing Force has broken UI and controls that scales so badly, very tiny and misaligned in many places in 4k resolution and 200% or 300% dpi scaling (equal to 720p and 1080p by Windows UI size)! Even main menus are now pretty broken! When you start every game in main menu of each game it says "play half life", each game has settings for HEV sounds and missing its own unique settings! And list of issues goes on and on and on!

Also all of game has surround sound broken! I at least expected game to update Miles sound system or at least provide it with dsound to xaudio\openal wrapper to finally restore what Vista broke!

How this update could be released without testing all the other GoldSRC games with shared Half Life engine and without universally fixing them all and applying same UI and control fixed to make them compatible with deck and gamepads and 4k displays and other modern features?

Good karma+3 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Half-life 25th Anniversary Update

They just released a patch on 19th (i.e. new patch today) that fixes mods and official games using the Half-life engine so that they don't crash on startup or after the initial valve logo.

Good karma+2 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ The day of reckoning draws near...

Deservingly at the top list of trending mods on modDB. Keep up the good work, you are doing holy work.

Good karma+4 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Germanic, Celtic and Slavic Pagans of Moddb

Jonathan Bowden:

"Paganism and Christianity are the wrong way round.

Christianity has provided the ethical and aesthetic superstructures through which most Western people think.

But, reality is pagan. Man is pagan. Nature is pagan.

Pagans have reacted against Christianity which is, deep down, a left-wing religion of humanism, love and tolerance.

Contemporary pagans believe that Christians are conservative, that they're stuffy, that they read the Daily Mail and stand for family values.

And Christians think of pagans as woolly, alternative leftists who want to tear things down.

A lot of Christian people are those who remain a bit residually patriotic and right-wing, whereas a lot of pagans are beyond "the Guardian".

But, in actual fact, Paganism is pre-Christian, barbaric, natural-law orientated and morally fascistic, whereas Christianity is a religion of tolerance, love and peace.

So, they're completely the wrong way round.

And, in their false symmetry, they indicate everything that's gone wrong, as part of the generalised tragedy."

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Capitalism and Other Topics Book Recommendations

Tidbits of Wisdom Book Recommendations Part 3:

Tacitus - 'Germania'
Virgil - 'Aeneid'
Cicero - 'On the Nature of the Gods'
Bahagahtvah Gita
The Dharma Manifesto
Patraic Colum - 'Nordic Gods and Heroes'
Homer - 'Iliad' and 'Odyssey'
Grimm's Fairy Tales
John Scheid - 'An Introduction to Roman Religion'
Swain Wodening - "Path to the Gods: Anglo Saxon Paganism for beginners" & "Hammer of the Gods: Anglo Saxon Paganism in the modern times"
Michael J. Smith - 'Ways of Asatru'
Stephen Mcnellan - 'Asatru: Ways of Our Ancestors'
Havamal

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Capitalism and Other Topics Book Recommendations

Tidbits of Wisdom Book Recommendations Part 2:

E. Michael Jones - 'The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit'
Kevin MacDonald - 'The Culture of Critique'
Germar Rudolf - 'Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of 'Truth' and 'Memory''
Nesta Webster - 'Secret Societies and Subversive Movements'
Kevin MacDonald - 'Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition'
Lynn & Vanhanen - 'IQ and the Wealth of Nations'
Oswald Spengler - 'The Decline of the West'
Wilmot Robertson - 'The Dispossessed Majority'
William Gayley Simpson - 'Which Way Western Man'
Francis P Yockey's - 'Imperium'
Revilo P Oliver - 'Enemy of Our Enemies'

Peter Schiff - 'How an Economy Grows and Why it Crashes'
Mary Ruwart - 'Healing Our World' (new edition is called 'The Compassion of Libertarianism')
-note: explains how govt healthcare has been killing people for over 50 years.
Milton Friedman - Socialized Medicine
Charlotte Iserbyt - 'Back to Basics Reform or... OBE *Skinnerian International Curriculum?'

Richard J. Herrnstein & Charles Murray - 'The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life'
-note: the method for IQ test is Ravens Progressive Matrices.
Richard Lynn - 'The Global Bell Curve: Race, IQ, and Inequality Worldwide'
J. F. Gariepy - 'The Revolutionary Phenotype'
Cavalli-Sforza - 'The History and Geography of Human Genes'
John Philippe Rushton - 'Is race a valid taxonomic construct ?'
John Philippe Rushton - 'Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective'
Arthur Robert Jensen - 'The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability (1998)'
Richard Lynn - 'Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis'
"Gene Wars | r/K Selection Theory" Series | Stefan Molyneux
Nicholas Wade - 'A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History'
Carleton Putnam - 'Race and Reason: A Yankee View' and 'Race and Reality: A Search for Solutions'
Michael A. Hoffman II - 'They were White and They Were Slaves'
Warren Farrell - 'The Myth of Male Power'
Roderick Kaine - 'Smart and Sexy'
Nicholas Wade - 'A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History'
Anonymous Conservative - 'The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics'
-note its about r/K selection theory.
Jared Taylor - 'White Identity'
Greg Johnson - 'In Defence of Prejudice'

Aldous Huxley - 'Brave New World'
-note: warned of 'scientific dictatorship', despotism under technocracy, it was based on real illumanitism, social darwinism and globalist idealogy.
George Orwell - '1984'
-note: less refined version of globalism that warned of censorship, secret police, surveillance state and thought control.
Dr David Duke - 'Jewish Supremacy' and 'The Secret Behind Communism'
Protocols of Zion (1903)
Henry Ford - 'The International Jew'
Paul Findley - 'They Dare to Speak Out'
Book-Anon - 'Germania'
Julius Evola - 'Revolt Against the Modern World', 'Men Among Ruins' and 'Ride the Tiger'
William Gayley Simpson - 'Which Way Western Man?'

Kevin MacDonald - 'Culture of Critique'
Yuri Slezkine - 'The Jewish Century'
Ludwig Witgenstein - 'Culture and Values'
Werner Sombart - 'The Jews and Modern Capitalism'
Alfred Rosenberg - 'The Track of the Jew through the Ages'
*more on Jewish interests in US politics, historical revisionism, religiosity and hatred of Christianity.
Maurice Samuel - 'You Gentiles'
Otto Weininger - 'Sex and Character'
Daniel Boyarin - 'Unheroic Conduct'
William Morris' - 'News From Nowhere'
Stephen Mitford Goodson - 'A History of Central Banking'
Neal Gabler - 'An Empire of Their Own'
Ryan Dawson - 'War by Deception' and 'The Empire Unmasked'

Corneliu Zelea - 'Codreanu's For My Legionaries'
Mike King's - 'The Bad War'
David Irving - 'Hitlers War'
Richard Tedor - 'Hitler's revolution'
Viktor Suvorov - 'Icebreaker' and 'The Chief Culprit: Stalin's Grand Design to Start World War II', and watch his lecture
Captain Archibald Ramsay - 'The Nameless War'
Benton Braderry - 'The Myth of German Villainy'
Alan Axelrod - 'The Real History of WW2'
Arthur Kemp - 'March of The Titans'
Charles Murray - 'Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts & Sciences'
Leon Degrelle - 'Story of The Waffen SS'
Hegel's - 'Philosophy of the Right',
Oswald Spengler's - 'Prussianism and Socialism'
Strachan – ‘The First World War’
Otto Straser – ‘Germany Tomorrow’
Carl Levy – ‘Currents of Italian Syndicalism Before 1926’

William Luther Pierce – ‘Who We Are’
Robert S. Griffin – ‘The Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds’
Lothrop Stoddard - 'Revolt against civilization' & 'The Rising Tide of Color'
Lawrence Brown - 'The Might of the West'
Friedrich Herz- 'Race and Civilization'
Peter Nicol - 'Britain's Blunder'
Oswald Spengler - 'The Decline of the West'
Patrick Buchanan - 'State of emergency' and 'Death of the West'
Douglas Reed - 'The Controversy of Zion'
Nesta Webster - 'World Revolution'
Ortega y Gasset Jose - 'The Revolt of the Masses'
Ragnar Redbeard - 'Might is Right'
Paul Elliott - 'The Last Legionary'

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Capitalism and Other Topics Book Recommendations

Tidbits of Wisdom Book Recommendations:

Balthazar Grecian - 'Manual Oracle' and 'Criticon',
Eich Fromm - 'Escape from Freedom and Mentally Healthy Society',
Laroshfuco - 'Maxims and Moral Reflections',
Blez Pascal - 'Thoughts',
Jean de Labruer - 'Characters',
V. - 'Mafia Manager',
Marcus Aurelius - 'Meditations'
Sun Tzu - 'The Art of War'
Machiavelli - 'The Prince'
Plato - 'Meno' and 'The Republic'
Aristotle - 'Politics' and 'Rhetoric'
Friedrich Nietzsche - 'Thus Spake Zarathustra' and 'Will to Power'
Martin Heidegger - 'Being In Time'
Bastiat - 'The Law'
Ayn Rand - 'Atlas Shrugged'

Jean-Louis Panné - 'Big Black Book of Communism'
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - 'The Gulag Archipelago'
Dumitru Bacu - 'The Anti-Humans'
-note: since the left could no longer win, they decided to import people who will reliably vote left (ie third world immigrants with the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965).
Dr. Joseph Goebbels - 'Communism with the Mask Off'
James Bacques - 'Other Losses'
Thomas Goodrich - 'Hellstorm'
Gunter Reimann - 'The Vampire Economy' (on mises)
Roland Huntford - 'The New Totalitarians'
Friedrich A. Hayek - 'The Road to Serfdom'
Carroll Quigley - 'Trajedy and Hope'
Sam Walton - 'Made In America'
Jim Nelson Black - 'When Nations Die: Ten Warning Signs of a Culture in Crisis'
John Glubb - 'The Fate of Empires'
Edward Gibbon - 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
Generation Zero by Steve Bannon

G. Edward Griffin - 'The Creature from Jekyll Island : A Second Look at the Federal Reserve'
Ellen Hodgson Brown - 'Web of Debt: The Shocking Truth about Our Money System 5th Revised ed'
Gottfried Feder - 'The Manifesto for the Abolition of Enslavement to Interest on Money'
John Perkins - 'Confessions of a Economic Hitman'
Thomas Sowell - 'Intellectuals and Society'
-note: reveals how few intellectuals have changed their views, even after evidence has firmly contradicted their views & produced major consequences in the pursuit of those views.
Vox Day - 'Cuckservative: How "Conservatives" Betrayed America'
CULTURAL MARXISM: The Corruption of America
M. Stanton Evans - 'Blacklisted by History - the Untold Story of Senator McCarthy Evans'
Ann Coulter - 'Mugged '

Murray Rothbard - 'An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought'
-note: teaches the core concepts of economics from a historical perspective.
Joseph Schumpeter - 'History of Economic Analysis'
Henry Hazlitt - 'Economics in One Lesson'
Steven Keen - 'Debunking Economics: The Naked Emperor Dethroned?'
Max Weber - 'General Economic History'
Milton Freedman - 'Capitalism and Freedom'
Hans-Hermann Hoppe - 'The Economics and Ethics of Private Property' and 'Democracy: The God That Failed'
-note: This is the author that made the basis for the argument of physical removal.
Michael Huemer - 'The Problem of Political Authority'
-note: NAP has exceptions, but the author assigns the burden of argument to anyone who wants to justify aggression. It's impossible for anyone to defend why any number of state programs they would recognize as immoral for an individual are somehow moral for a state.
The Evolution of the Parasitical Class: Past, Present and Future | Stefan Molyneux

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Putin: US Not A White Christian Country Anymore - Need To Preserve Our Culture

Some points on Christianity for those who believe that we are meant to bow before enemies, outsiders and subversion, and to merely be subservient to the rest of the world.

Christianity, is it compatible with our nationalist, socialist or the right-wing movement in general? Yes. Some may think that Christianity is giving all your resources or shelving your political interests for the third world but nothing can be further from the truth. We are meant to put aside ego to satisfy and serve the Truth and community (the organic state). Love god is to love the cosmic order (natural order) Love thy neighbour and its synonym, love thy enemy, does not mean sacrifice your country men or nation's citizens to some other group, sacrificing one group for another is not consistent with Christian divine law. Its meant to explain how man must be in complete service to his comrades rather trying to exploit people. It means abolish personal interests, putting ego aside to put a stop to vice like greed. It also means to not exploit your neighbour for another neighbour. Whats just is to voluntarily sacrifice yourself for others, for that of Truth, the community and justice. Love thy enemy is basically the same commandment. What love thy enemy does mean private enemy in latin and greek, which meant sacrifice your personal interest whenever its conflicting with other common interests and secure the values of justice and community. It refers to renouncing personal interest and refusing duels at the time, i.e. not pursue personal vendetta's. Sacrifice and service for the community is the highest values of Christianity historically amongst all kinds of Christians and its not incompatible with nationalists of all stripes. The point of Christianity is that nobody can rule by way of exploitation over a nation of people with ideals, nothing is as great as to give ones service and life for divine Truth and justice.

God hates gays, pedos, and is against all false religions. Benevolence and mercy is for the weak, and not for the damnable, evil, those who betray god and the church and those who are outright hostile. Scripture is only referring to personal enemies, to forgive them for their sins. Not to forgive political/public enemies which is very clear in the Greek translations.

Thats why in many english translations the bible seems schizophrenic and seems to "damn people to hell" one moment, with righteous indignation or what people call a "righteous mind". While the next moment being all about peace and tolerance. Its PEACE THROUGH TRUTH, not by accepting falsehoods of any kind and tolerating public enemies that want to destroy you and the artifacts/architecture that you believe in

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ The Way of the Sith - The Dark Side Philosophy and Compendium

Some threads about Sith philosophy:

The Power of the Dark Side: Reddit.com
Magickal Worldview: Reddit.com
Tools and Persona: Reddit.com
Path of Bold Action: Reddit.com
Sith Rede: Reddit.com
True Strength as it leads from Passion: Reddit.com
Success with Passion: Reddit.com
Mental acuity, Unfettered and Unbroken: Reddit.com
Habits, Orderly environment, Precommitment or Commitment ritual: Reddit.com
Awakening Strengths: Reddit.com
Sith Sorcery & the Sith Code: Reddit.com

Good karma+5 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Dark Side - Passed

There are currently 2 texts that can be of use to you, the first and second books.

Here is the main link for anyone interested: Mediafire.com

Drive.google.com (first book of the Sith)

Drive.google.com (second book of the Sith)

These are the collective writings Of the Sith Order, made by members of the Order.

Also readings from the Sith Realist/Sithist community called the Grand Book of the Sith: Mediafire.com

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Conservatives of ModDB

Looks like experts were wrong and it wasn't common sense after all. New mask study in 600K study shows no evidence they work to as promised: Youtube.com

Link to study: Cochranelibrary.com

According to the Cochrane review: “Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory-confirmed influenza/SARS-CoV-2 compared to not wearing masks.”

Even fitted N95 masks in health care settings; involving 7779 participants "The use of a N95 respirator compared to just a medical surgical mask, probably makes little or no difference for the objective and or the more precise outcome of laboratory confirmed influenza infection".

Technocrats and media pundits have dropped the ball giving people false hope, controlling people and actually could have caused more infection spread by still getting people to walk around strangers who might be infected and coughing.

Good karma+3 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ The Way of the Sith - The Dark Side Philosophy and Compendium

There are currently 2 texts that can be of use to you, the first and second books.

Here is the main link for anyone interested: Mediafire.com

Drive.google.com (first book of the Sith)

Drive.google.com (second book of the Sith)

These are the collective writings Of the Sith Order, made by members of the Order.

Also readings from the Sith Realist/Sithist community called the Grand Book of the Sith: Mediafire.com

Good karma+4 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Conservatives of ModDB

People don't merely support a regime because it has useful or good formal rules, regulations, bonds, codes, laws, but because they believe in the myth and understanding of what the regime stands for, its ideas, values, tenets and precepts. What informs us with the what and why we should follow the regime and how we abide by a reason for existing, direction or the purpose behind the system. What makes sense of natural law and thus a sense of how to take concerted personal actions to break obstacles is a good step forward i.e. the obstacles that holds us back from forward momentum, whats keeping us from continually moving the ball forward and making the reality we desire or are passionate about, to be passion to produce the ends we wish to achieve, so that we believe in something compelling and true. Otherwise we are sacrificing for vanity or sacrificing yourself to feel important and unintentionally may be strengthening the regime we may oppose. All people within our system for it to be long-lasting needs a good enemy, they need someone to blame for shortcomings, and something to rally against when the goals have failed. Without an enemy to flex our goals in opposition too, we could be acting as a tool for the enemies purposes without being cognizant of it.

We're in great danger to be useful tools for the enemies purpose of being soft, easiness, complacency by accepting a progressive agenda, by just going along with "politeness" of social justice when it works against our collective interests, goals, will and identity. It also sometimes overrides individual rights which gets other groups riled up.

In the cosmopolitan view of man religious sect, local community, family, social class, ethnic identity, moral or virtuous character, are at best subordinate considerations and are considered to also be much of the time to be against the fulfillment of human potential. They see those things as artificial and obsolete barriers. Cosmopolitanism thus rationalizes the adoption of a mass framework of a modern regime and the collective disciplines that characterizes the managerial regime and homogenization of production and consumption, through which the multinational organizations and economics of which managerial capitalism operates in.-Samuel T. Francis "Leviathan and its enemies"

The real affect of mass managerial political and social reforms is to level the bourgeoisie differentiations to liberate the masses from tyranny of bourgeoisie or prescriptive institutions and homogenize the mass population and bring it under the control of the mass organizations, the alliance of mass and managers against the bourgeoisie is the basis of managerial caeserism.-Samuel T. Francis "Leviathan and its enemies"

Contrary to public opinion, the banks, the military and defense contractors aren't the problem, they are neutral on political-cultural issues in America.

Equality is flawed because it seems to produce a intention to destroy differences between human beings, to wipe away all the cultures and values that are inherent to particular ethnic or racial groups around the world, which is exactly what Free Masons and Globalists want to do. They at best want to accelerate that erasure or eradication of culture. Marxism for instance is for a complete equality, erasing the principle of ethnicity and personality. The culture, tradition, heritage and ethnicity makes a country stamped with unique civilisational traits, nothing like it can come about again if its erased. They try to tear down national independence, cultural elevation and economic independence with coercion and impossible solutions to things that are not honest social evils. They make demands which not only overshoot the goals but their realization is also practically impossible or ruins the economic independence of the nation.

Good karma+2 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Conservatives of ModDB

"But perhaps in thirty years they will be. Perhaps? I would bet money on it. And I would also bet that, by the time this principle is established, denying it will be the equivalent of racism. Us old fogeys who were born in the 1970s will be convulsed with guilt and shame at the thought that the US actually considered it ethically acceptable to turn away, deport, and otherwise penalize our fellow human beings, on the ridiculous and irrelevant grounds that they were born somewhere else.

So the Cathedral wins coming and going. Today, it does not suffer the political backlash that would be sure to ensue if the Inner Party endorsed opening the borders to… everyone. Still less if it actually did so. (Unless it let the new Americans vote as soon as they set foot on our sacred soil, which of course would be the most Christian approach.) And in 2038, having increased North America’s population to approximately two billion persons, none of them illegal, and all living in the same Third World conditions which it has already inflicted on most of the planet, our blessed Cathedral will have the privilege of berating the past with its guilt for not having recognized the obvious truth that no person is illegal. Ain’t it beautiful?"

-----

So what does all of this mean, and what can we do about it?

A progressive resolution cannot override the civil rights that has been built up. "No person is illegal" will inevitably be propagated through the basically its propaganda "wing" of culture power. i.e. through the media, academia and serious artists, whom all work together on the manufactured "truths", that this social networks Mencius Moldbug calls "the brain" (the aforementioned media, academia and serious artists). Leftists of all kinds including progressives seriously believe in this proposition and push it whenever they can. Even libertarians that where on this group before but had no argument to push back on this point where shooed away from the conversation when it is was backed up against this stonewalling inalienable universal civil rights suggestion that we've been stuck with.

"No person is illegal" will be pushed harder then ever before. And will berate people for not creating a better state and version of things in the perverse affair that everyone will share in the dismal lackluster standards. Joseph McCarthy thought he was attacking a bunch of communists but he was really attacking the informal American cultural elite and elite establishment for continually moving further and further towards the left, heading towards this miserable utopia. Even if Trump materially approves of a staunch opposition or clash with these utopian changes, and materially improves the situation on legal restrictions on entry, punishing and expelling visa overstays, creating the wall. These culture power groups can overcome any of these challenges to instituting sanctionary cities, decriminalizing overstays, cancelling deportation and laxing these legal restrictions for illegals over time because these can become through their influence, control and dominance change the system to their suit agenda.

Trump may have been in office and may become president again but hes not the holder of power. The only way to win is complete reformation of the system from within. That is until the political components of the system are dismantled. "The Cathedral" which is all those elites who hold sway over the culture, which is the academia and the press, then theres political component of the civil service, the judiciary, congressional staffers, NGO's, corporate monopolies, corporate contractors, and congressional are the top-level bureaucracy that actually decides the supreme court justices that wield alot of power. It isn't the top-level of the bureaucracy that rotates every four years that we have to focus most on, the bureaucracy needs to be changed which sets the rules, budgets, the organization and makes the rules followed to the letter all over the country. Even Communist USSR was destroyed from within partially because many different ethnic groups where not molded into the bureaucracy, ethnic tensions in the Soviet Union where common place and still are prevalent in Russia. I.e. laws, customs and formal rules where not made to pander to separately to each ethnic group in each of its regions, that have different perspectives and tastes.

Someone commented awhile ago: "The soviets had a friendship of the people's notion (Order of Friendship of Peoples). Which was a ethno-national regional idea where they would emphasize ethnic cultural differences among regions." But even this did not stop that from happening and dismantling the USSR. Balkanisation or succession is likely to be future for the US rather than complete distrust and overhaul of the status quo if things remain moving towards "the Cathedral's" agenda.

Good karma+2 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Conservatives of ModDB

"We hit that one out of the park, didn’t we? Okay. So why is it ethical to label newborn babies as “American” or “Mexican,” due to nothing but the descent and geographical position at birth of their parents, and give the former a cornucopia of benefits from which the latter is barred—such as the right to live, work, and drink from drinking fountains in the continental United States? What makes Washington think it is somehow ethical to establish two classes of human, “Americans” and “Mexicans,” based only on coincidences of birth that are just as arbitrary as “black” versus “white,” and treat the two completely differently? How does this differ from racism, Southern style?

You think this is ugly? Oh, we can get worse. Let’s suppose the US, in its eagerness to treat these second-class humans, if not quite as well as possible, at least better than we treat them now, establishes a new guest-worker program which is open only to Nigerians. Any number of Nigerians may come to the US and work.

There are certain restrictions, however. They have to live in special guest-worker housing. They have to go to their workplace in the morning, and return before the sun sets. They may not wander around the streets at night. They must carry special guest-worker passes. Obviously, they can’t vote. And they are strictly prohibited from using all public amenities, including, of course, drinking fountains.

Is it a more ethical policy to have this program, or not to have it? If you think no Nigerians could be found to take advantage of it, you’re quite wrong. If you have the program, should you cancel it, and send the Nigerians home, to a life of continued poverty back in Nigeria? How is this helping them? On the other hand, our program has all the major features of apartheid. And surely no-apartheid is better than apartheid.

There is a very easy resolution to this problem: adopt the principle that no person is illegal. This rule is perfectly consistent with “applied Christianity.” It is taught at all our great universities. It is implied every time a journalist deploys the euphemism “undocumented.” And I’m sure there are dozens of ways in which it could be incorporated into our great Living Constitution. There is only one problem: the people are not quite ready for it."

Good karma+2 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Conservatives of ModDB

"Of course it is not. It does not rest in formal interpretation of texts. It rests in ethical judgments. It is the job of the legislator to make ethical judgments, and the California Supreme Court is doing its job. It’s a pity it has to carpool with such a large bodyguard of lies, but that’s the modern world for ya.

And we know where these ethical judgments come from. They are Inner Party judgments, and the Inner Party’s ethics are Christian, Protestant, and Quaker in their origins. Fine. We all need ethics, and “applied Christianity” will do as well as anything else. What interests me is when these ethical judgments come about.

Imagine, for instance, that the California Supreme Court had decided in, say, 1978, that it was unethical—I mean, unconstitutional—for California to prohibit its male citizens from marrying each other. Is this a thinkable event? I think not. And yet the court’s writ ran just as far and was just as powerful in 1978 as in 2008. And ethics, surely, have not changed.

The Living Constitution does not adapt with changes in ethics. It adapts with changes in public opinion—as long as that public opinion is shifting in the direction of “applied Christianity.” Public opinion was ready for abortion in 1973—barely. It was ready for gay marriage in 2008—barely. It was not ready for gay marriage in 1973. What will it be ready for in 2033? One can see this as a noble concession to the great principle of democracy. One can also see it as the Cathedral getting away with whatever it can get away with, and nothing else.

Larry Auster, probably the most imaginative and interesting right-wing writer on the planet, who also happens to be a converted fundamentalist Christian with all the theopolitical baggage that you, dear open-minded progressive, would expect from such a person, has a good term for this: the unprincipled exception. Briefly, an unprincipled exception is a policy that violates some absolute principle of ethics held by the policymaker, but is not openly acknowledged as such a violation.

For example, dear progressive, why is racism wrong? Racism is wrong because all humans are born simply as humans, having done nothing right or wrong, and it is incompatible with our deeply-held ethical principles to mark these newborn babies with indelible labels which assign them either privileges or penalties which they have not earned. Such as the privilege of being able to drink at sparkling-clean water fountains marked “Whites Only,” or the penalty of having to go out back to the horse trough."

Good karma+2 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Conservatives of ModDB

Amazon.com.au

Readable version online: Unqualified-reservations.org

In that book by Mencius Moldbug mulls over the following:

"Take the recent decision of the California Supreme Court, who have just discovered that the state’s Constitution allows people of the same sex to marry. As a matter of policy, I have no objection at all to this. Quite the contrary. I think it’s an excellent and sensible policy. I do, however, have an interest in where this policy came from.

This is what, in the 20th-century progressive public-policy world, we call “law.” The craft of the lawyer used to be the craft of discovering how the words of a law were intended, by the officials who ratified the law, to imply that one’s client was in the right. I think it’s fairly safe to assume that the drafters and ratifiers of the California Constitution and its various amendments had no such understanding of their work. (Try reading the actual decision. It’s a fascinating hunk of boilerplate.)

Nonetheless, the drafters wrought better than they knew. The practice of drafting laws which are vague to the point of meaninglessness, then empowering “judges” to “interpret” them, is simply another way of abolishing politics. Congress legislates this way all the time. All they are doing is transferring the power of legislation to a more private body, which is not subject to public scrutiny and the other painful woes of politics. The great thing about the gay marriage decision is that no one in California has any idea who made it. I think there are nine people on the California Supreme Court. Who are they? How did they get their jobs? Who the heck knows? No one seems to care at all.

The US Constitution was the first and greatest offender in this department. Its drafters did not even agree on such basic matters as whether a state could leave the Union. In practice, it made the Supreme Court the supreme legislative assembly, which over the last 200 years (mostly over the last 50) has created a body of decisions, perfectly comparable to Britain’s unwritten constitution, that we call constitutional law. The idea that this legislative corpus can be derived in some mystical, yet automatic, way from the text of the Constitution is preposterous, and no one holds it.

Instead we have the Living Constitution, which always seems to live to the left. I’ve never heard anyone, not even the most deranged fundamentalist, propose reinterpreting the Constitution to provide rights to fetuses, an obvious corollary of this approach—if the Inner Party and the Outer Party were symmetric opposites, and the “life” of the Constitution was powered by political democracy."

Good karma+2 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Conservatives of ModDB

We use chaos or antinomianism to find niches, exploit people, to exploit opportunities and then we use rule of law to limit those possibilities and opportunities that we find incorrect or immoral. Thus antinominiasm is inherently opposed to rule of law. The natural human drive to exploit the people can be bucked or blocked by the move to build better institutions to use rule of law to limit parasitical behaviour and to create behaviours that are good or acceptable. We have a big problem here in the west, we have no solutions to deal with the industrialised propaganda, research institutions, schools, media and academy included in culture power as a form of progressive propaganda. I.e. against gender norms, stable nuclear families, morality and promotes a ethno-masochism, feminist opposition to masculinity and is misandry. We have problems that may are not overcome just merely by memetics. We have two things on our side. Truth and heroism. Remember the right supports peace, order and security. The left represents war, anarchy and crime (chaos).

Mencius Moldbug suggests we've been “swimming left” for 400-500 years starting with the Protestant revolution. As a believer in cyclical history, he’s well aware of the general rise and fall of civilizations and doesn’t project our current one onto ancient times.

In fact, Moldbug has recently been recommending an excellent book called The Ancient City on the Indo-European family cult which was the root of ancient society.

A video on the topic of "How the Cathedral Exercises Power": Youtube.com

Good karma+3 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Conservatives of ModDB

Nationalism accepts tradition, culture, common history, spirit, religion, respecting our ancestors and creating a future for our posterity, engaging in myth making and bringing heroic figures back as role models for future people. We need these kinds of localities back, we need that European spirit of striving for greatness and then we need to unite politically in order to win. For this reason we need to be able to combine philosophy, metaphysics and spirituality into a cohesive movement.

It's been often said that by people like Mencius Moldbug that the left = chaos and the right = order. This has been true for a very long time, and its only been proven to be true in the current era where all kinds of madness, dysfunctional or radicals are in the academia and media and they are getting away with pushing pro-immigration, deconstruction of gender norms, BLM, feminists, attacking conventional morality, destroying the family unit, globalism: Twitter.com

What Moldbug suggests to us two fundamental facts: 1) that the center is always defined relative to the existing political spectrum, and 2) that the existing political spectrum is almost perpetually shifting to the Left. That is what the "moderate" fails to understand. That is because of the shorthand Leftism is presented as inevitable and antinomian, the latter causes that leftward movement and the decline, moral and social degeneracy and promotion of things like narratives of victimhood, when what we need is narratives of heroism.

Also Elon Musk Just Announced HE IS ABOUT TO UN-SUSPEND ALMOST ALL THE BANNED ACCOUNTS! Man the meme cannons.

Good karma+3 votes
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Operation Reinhard - The Problem with Individualism

According to Oswald Spengler personal liberty is an issue with individualism and liberalism; "Liberation from all bonds of civilisation, from every kind and form of custom; pride and quietly born poverty, silent fulfillment of duty, renunciation for the sake of a task or conviction, greatness in enduring ones fate, loyalty, honour, responsibility, achievements, all this is a constant reproach to the humiliated and insulted", i.e. hes saying that liberty as a quest to remove all bonds, all rules, all codes, all laws, all compulsions, all restrictions, all prohibitions and therefore to place before us only a conception of hedonistic antinomian goals are flawed conception and they as a philosophy group of third position want instead a realization of the liberty of Spirit. i.e. to believe in the superior conception of an cult of an ideal. That was Thomas Carlyle, it's resolute growing of defeat of what stands in the way of survival and to adhere to our inherent traits. Thats what the ideal of the spirit comprises of.

Very different yet its not a quest to be freed from everything that could curtail your desires, aspirations and egotistical ambitions but rather a quest to affirm what is most important in man to find himself or herself again and stand proud as a worker, innovator or creator. The things we most ponder as our purpose or goal as part of a integrated whole rather than merely as individuals. I think alot of people would say that infringement on personal liberty is going to be a common argument for those who disagree with collectivism. It balances responsibilities with liberty rather than going full on with either one, taking care to take into account both individuality and collectivist ideology and synthesizing the two.

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Operation Reinhard - The Problem with Individualism

Merely cultural and heritage values are good, there is aesthetics too but the bulk of it is values and we simply cannot hold onto to those values for long without a system in place to promote a worldview that takes into account spirituality, philosophy and metaphysics that we can be proud of.

The more important argument against this Leftist position is that the dominance of an ethnic super-majority group in society ought not render that group politically nor morally impotent. On the contrary, to be the historical majority elevates the importance of that majority's interests in the society and culture above all others. The founding people of the nation ought to have the primary say in the future and direction of the nation, and to argue otherwise is to favor subversion and ethno-cultural destruction over self-determination and traditional continuity.

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Operation Reinhard - The Problem with Individualism

What eventually lead to the fall of Rome (March of the Titans and another good book on this topic is Race or Mongrel) as well when the mixed together with barbarians, and basically caused the absolute eradication of the ethnos, the culture and the civilization that they had grown. All was completely eradicated which weakened the empire since without the biology, the genetics that create that culture and civilisation, then you eventually have foreign group's interests, identity, culture, traditions and customs replace your own since that foreign group's has a stronger will to power and collective will and push to replace that culture that they don't like. Which is what has happened time and time again throughout societies that decided to go multicultural.

What was radical (yes radical) about Ancient Athens is that we're going to intentionally displace that which makes your people, your blood, your soul, your nation, your power, your identity, your happiness, your prosperity, your mind, your education, your overall perspective on the world, we're going to demand that those things instead of being utilized for a homogenous people to decide what goes on, your going to have it replaced by a rootless cosmopolitanism and citizenship idea to replace all of that with foreign cultures that aren't as individualistic and completely overthrow the old order. You can't have a specific identity, state of your own (nation state, i.e. ethnos with a state), history, tradition, culture and heritage if your white but if your non-white (or if you where a barbarian in ancient athens or Roman empire) then your culture still matters and you're allowed to vote and undermine the formerly majority white European culture, aslong as that foreign group is allowed to vote as a big voting block or coalition of foreign interests that can undermine all of that then you are disallowing a true singular identity or order to reign. Instead you get balkanisation or intergenerational ethnic conflict until the civilisation dissolves and increasing welfare spending outstripes the capacity to get money through taxation as the amount of incomes you can get is heavily reduced because the spending required to buy votes is outstripped by the amount of people who are no longer productive who can keep the net gain of prosperity for that society to keep going. Which results in defacing the currency by huge money printing now but used to be by reducing the amount of actual gold or silver in the coins, so that they can keep on issueing more and more money to the public to buy their votes while the actual coffers of wealth for the nation overall and of the state are drying up. Rome suffered severely from this. Instead the other non-white foreigners have a net negative on the overall prosperity of the country and instead decreases the net contribution to that country (i.e. per capita lifetime budgetary impacts of whites, blacks and hispanics). I.redd.it

In other words, there is no culture and civilisation for European people without the white working class or middle class to help build up the wealth and keep that culture and civilisation going. Thus suppressing the white majority eventually as the foreigners out vote you, outstrip you of your rights (basically cause balkanisation where different national cultural enclaves exist which want different norms, culture and rights i.e. non-white norms, culture and rights) just because they hold citizenship then they are just legitimate as you are in creating something completely foreign to your culture and civilisation. I got redpilled on this by Joel Davis:

Snippet here: Youtube.com
Full video here: Youtube.com

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Operation Reinhard - The Problem with Individualism

Heres a post I made on a video I linked below about Liberalism and its devolution into something alien to our people. Well worth listening to the video in full. All the principles that we used to believe in was correct until Western civilisation started getting it wrong, and experienced de-evolution, producing ideas and trends that we end up enabling the logic behind.

Original liberalism did have gender norms, Christian faith and ethno-nationalism (atleast in the American and Australian context). Citizenship of classical liberalism and liberalism in general where based on citizenship. That once you have it, and it may be difficult in yester year to get it, but when you got it you essentially had all these rights and standards given to you and gets worked out between citizens. It didn't even need to be theorised at the time is that ethnicity, race and gender roles and all these normative markers of identity. Basically my point is that liberalism is realizing is something older than the enlightenment, as citizenship as the core locus of order, as the main political unit. There was an intention in ancient athens to break up aristocratic families or clans and breaking them up and break up their sovereign power by making them, forcing them to marry their children out and thus dispersing their wealth out to the lower classes. Then what socrates did a hundred years later is that we're going to intentionally displace that aristocracy because the people don't have the power to disperse their own prestige or political influence over society that liberalism was meant to provide them with instead a equal vote or share of the ability to choose the top reigns or the very top of the political system to order the rest of society and create its bureaucracy exactly as the people want it to be. Athenian democracy then was about pursuing the common good as opposed to "collective-like" clan interests. What was normal at the time before Athenian democracy was to create these clans, tribes, sects, covens, cells or gangs to create the most powerful ideological group, kinship group, honor group or familial group in a society.

Thats what was natural (committing to your clan, tribe or kinship group) thing to do since if you can gain power through your individual will, reputation (character) and jostle for influence by being the most true that you can be (being right most of the time compared to others) then you deserve to have a share of the power in that system. Athenian democracy threw that on its head and said, "doesn't matter how qualified you are, how smart you are, how resourceful you are or how talented you are, your say is the same as any body elses" without evidence, without a real perspective just aslong as 50 percent plus one decide that way, then suddenly the thing voted on because "moral", a "standard", "right" and "true". Again without any kind of qualities within the person to give that opinion, decidion or right any real weight to it. Just what people think and that's it. That's the end of the discussion. The incognito decision without any responsibility, legal right, in complete anonymity, just any body will decide the fate or overall outcomes for millions of people. It was ridiculous. And still is.

Good karma+1 vote
DravenTheCrow
DravenTheCrow - - 28 comments @ Natural law

The beliefs shared here which have remained unnamed for some reason is what coalesces with the Identitarian philosophy of ‘The Great Replacement’ – the conviction that the policies of global elites are intentionally replacing native European populations with non-European ethnic groups, in a ‘Genocide by Substitution’. Its about eradicating white people through forceful integration, displacement of ethnic culture, national identity, traditions, practices and shared history or past. I support the idea of using our constitutionally guaranteed rights to self-determination and right of free association - its only utilizing whats already available to the community and ethnic group to selectively associate with whomever they like.

I'm sure that nobody here is talking about Pagan gods, self-sacrifice or working with the enemy. We're all basically on the same side because we want the same thing for America. We want economically liberal/progressive and socially conservative positions/stances to win out and for the state to crumble, which is inevitable.

But first you must make a commitment to the rejection of idolatry, universalist liberalism, hedonism, feminism. Depravity or sleaziness only breeds a weak opposition. The part to realize coconcurrently with rejection of what has gone wrong is to favor and participate with destiny and order. We can believe that we are duty bound to our goals, and the character-driven goals or demands set the stage for a new order. Our goals of our duty can include to create an organic or strong political organic body politic. A society where each organ of nation does not contradict or work to the detriment of the other organs, so that each works efficaciously to be the truth, to remain strong, and to work tirelessly for it's totality. This means making a spiritual, political and economic force.

Good karma+2 votes