This group is for everyone who like tanks, sci-fi tanks, real tanks, funny tanks, you can put here tank mods, tank maps, simply everything with straps, armor and gun :D

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
The Original Tank?
embed
share
view previous next
 
Post comment Comments
_w_
_w_ Feb 11 2012, 2:27pm says:

I wouldn't call it tank, because it doesn't have firepower.
maybe a torques with some kind of defensive attributes could be considered a tank.
thoughts lorddracnar?:p

+3 votes     reply to comment
Lord.Blackthorn Author
Lord.Blackthorn Feb 11 2012, 2:38pm says:

Sometimes archers,where hidden in the middle,or spearmen. There's some firepower,Maybe.

+3 votes   reply to comment
romanius24
romanius24 Feb 11 2012, 3:10pm says:

maybe the armored war elephant or the cataphract...i'd say those are "tanks"

+2 votes     reply to comment
‡vlado32‡ Creator
‡vlado32‡ Feb 11 2012, 3:40pm replied:

Yea elephants that Hannibal Barkas used against Romans were used similiar way as tanks now

+2 votes   reply to comment
Lord.Blackthorn Author
Lord.Blackthorn Feb 11 2012, 3:20pm says:

I totally agree.War elephants were brutal on the battlefeild.

+2 votes   reply to comment
=СРБ=Ori`verda
=СРБ=Ori`verda Feb 11 2012, 3:37pm says:

The earliest form of "armor" were horse driven units like the Chariot and later the Knight, this also includes the War Elephant. This is merely a defensive manoeuvre which has proven very effective and could be counted as "armor" considering the fact that they wear iron armor and when they combine in this formation they are though to crack, thus they are armor :)

+1 vote     reply to comment
_w_
_w_ Feb 11 2012, 4:51pm says:

torquere = "to hurl smth"
torques means pretty much every roman siege weapon.
i'd say their mobile siege towers were the real 'tanks' because they ussually had a ballista inside it and they were plated with wood or iron and sometimes they added wet animal skins to avoid flaming arrows.
here you got armor and firepower

+1 vote     reply to comment
Lord.Blackthorn Author
Lord.Blackthorn Feb 11 2012, 5:41pm says:

Does anyone out there watch "Battles B.C.? on the History channel.

+1 vote   reply to comment
ideLOLog
ideLOLog Feb 12 2012, 8:08am says:

It is more correct to call this an original IFV.

+1 vote     reply to comment
redferoz
redferoz Feb 16 2012, 2:49am says:

just a "moving bunker" hehe just joking :)

+2 votes     reply to comment
Commissar_Delta
Commissar_Delta Jun 1 2013, 12:01am says:

it does not support infantry. IT IS INFANTRY therefore not a tank

+1 vote     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Description

Hi,thought this was pretty Funny but true.The Roman Army used this formation was used for centuries.the (testudo-formation).Any thoughts on this, would be interesting.Does anyone have more Roman photos?

Image Details
Type
Concept
Date
Feb 11th, 2012
Size
1024×768
Options
URL
Embed (big)
Embed
Share
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only