This group is for everyone who like tanks, sci-fi tanks, real tanks, funny tanks, you can put here tank mods, tank maps, simply everything with straps, armor and gun :D

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Tweet Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
Spetsnaz_Reaper Feb 23 2013, 2:40pm says:

Never compare the T-72 tank to the battle that the Iraqis had against America, as they were using old, worn down Polish T-72 tanks that the Poles had sold to Iraq basically as scrap. The barrels were even past their life time operation.

T-72 tank was a good tank for its time.

+8 votes     reply to comment
rkraptor70 Author
rkraptor70 Feb 23 2013, 3:15pm replied:

It still is. The BM variant arguably outmatches the M1A2 is terms of protection and firepower.

+3 votes   reply to comment
VWV Feb 23 2013, 3:59pm replied:

Except for the fact that even last T-72 versions have so-so optics...

+2 votes     reply to comment
cordenand Feb 23 2013, 2:53pm says:

i read somewhere that T72s have poor protection vs say like RPGs thats even if the warhead does not pen the armor the crew inside will still feel the power of the blast badly is it true?

+2 votes     reply to comment
The_Integral Feb 23 2013, 9:43pm replied:

Most T-72's still in use are encased in enough ERA that they'll have, at a minimum, a fair chance again most light infantry AT weapons, although generally they would still be worse off than Western tanks.

The Soviets followed a Cold War doctrine of overwhelming enemy ground forces with a large quantity of armor, and as a result their tanks were much smaller, cheaper and lighter than Western tanks (most Western tanks like the Abrams or Leopard II range from about 25%-50% heavier than the T-80 and T-72). While the smaller size of the tanks negates some difference in weight, the Soviet tanks were generally not as well armored as comparable western models.

Arguably this has made Soviet armor not age very well, since the type of large scale ground warfare the T-72 was built for has (thankfully) began to seem unlikely to occur anytime soon.

+5 votes     reply to comment
Spudman619 Feb 24 2013, 3:42pm replied:

I'm glad someone has the sense to understand this. Most, but not all, people are just like OMG I KNOW IT'S NAME AND IT'S RUSSIAN SO IT MUST BE GOOD!!!1ONE!!!

+2 votes     reply to comment
Panzert Feb 24 2013, 9:17pm replied:

The_Integral always provides great insight with his comments, unfortunately you only see him every blue moon.

+3 votes     reply to comment
Post a Comment
click to sign in

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) which we encourage all contributors to do.

2000 characters limit; HTML formatting and smileys are not supported - text only

Image Details
Feb 23rd, 2013
Embed Thumb
Report Abuse
Report media
Add Media
Members only