This group is open to everyone who likes any kind of aircraft

F4F On Carrier
embed
share
view previous
Share Image
Share on Facebook Post Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
Sakura Matou
Sakura Matou - - 8,388 comments

They sure are not :) We should play a game together one day I think I have seen you in game actually.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
SunnyBittern
SunnyBittern - - 638 comments

You could always try scheduling an event. Im sure a lot of people in this group fly the skies of WarThunder.

I play too, but I am more of a WoWp person, and not really good in either of those.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Sakura Matou
Sakura Matou - - 8,388 comments

WoWp.. Shudders. Tried it for a week quickly uninstalled it but play what you enjoy :) Also I'm to lazy to make an event hahaha

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
SunnyBittern
SunnyBittern - - 638 comments

Heh, I understand. Even though I like WoWp, I wont deny that at the moment WT is your go to game and overall better product.

WoWp needs a lot of polish, but given time it most likely will get there.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Sakura Matou
Sakura Matou - - 8,388 comments

I sure hope so because as it is now even with the updates I would hardly call it a game.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Jack__Sparrow
Jack__Sparrow - - 620 comments

I have a question. I bought this exact plane and if you ask me it's not that good. For money I gave for him I was expecting it to be a lot better. So my question is it just me or F4F really sucks?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
GriffinZ
GriffinZ - - 4,719 comments

it's a great plane, although ingame stats-whise it seems to be inferior to buffalo in most every way, including rate of climb, top speed and turn time...

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Hideyoshi_Raian Author
Hideyoshi_Raian - - 250 comments

Your'e using it wrong.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Jack__Sparrow
Jack__Sparrow - - 620 comments

well you could say that since im not using it at all :)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Hideyoshi_Raian Author
Hideyoshi_Raian - - 250 comments

btw my WT nick is Hans_Waldmann

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Sakura Matou
Sakura Matou - - 8,388 comments

Oh ok so not VonBrauhn guess I had the wrong guy :)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Sakura Matou
Sakura Matou - - 8,388 comments

A few things that turn me off right away to WoWP. Aircraft have life bars... Loaded with paper planes ((concepts)) at the expense of planes like the Ju-87 and FW-190? No British Tech tree O_o Really? Clunky controls..Poor flight models. I just don't know what Wargaming was thinking.. Also anyone who wants my WT name feel free to ask :)

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Hideyoshi_Raian Author
Hideyoshi_Raian - - 250 comments

WT Name?

Reply Good karma+2 votes
Sakura Matou
Sakura Matou - - 8,388 comments

War Thunder name. Or are you saying you want it? PM me if you do.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
SunnyBittern
SunnyBittern - - 638 comments

I can see you watch Mighty Jingles videos.

Life bars aren't a problem for me, at least they make sure you don't suddenly get one shotted.

Planes like Ju-87 and FW-190 need their own branches, which will come.
The same goes for British, they will come.

Wargaming goes for the more exotic and lesser known designs.

The rest I can't say, for I think both are sufficient.

Besides, as far as I know, WT uses already ready engine while Wargaming is making their own from almost a scratch, so of course WT will have better gameplay.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+4 votes
Sakura Matou
Sakura Matou - - 8,388 comments

Yeah I have recently :P But I had that complaint before I know who he was. But my friends and I think the same as do a lot of people. Also WoWP is using big huge world. The same engine as WoT.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account:

Description

Apparently, those Carrier crews are not known giver of fucks.