When your president kicks your ass and you don't know it! Thread

Taken from Slax0rNET : Slax0rnet.com

Pretty soon, the United States of America will be on their way to the voting booths. Hopefully, the people of the United States will restore our belief in humanity by not re-elected George W Bush.

This hope is not to spite Bush, but is because of the obvious mistakes and hardships that Bush has already brought to the ‘great’, ‘successful’ and ‘free’ country: Great for the wealthy, successful for the country’s debt and free of compassion.

Your president lied to you with a straight face and said that there were Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. When no weapons were found, Bush did admit that he knew this all along – he just didn’t admit it to you, the public. The weapons that they did find were the same chemical weapons that the USA had given to Iraq years before. They were found buried.

Amazingly, George W Bush took the largest economy surplus and turned it into the largest recession in years. He spent billions of dollars for the war on terrorism – one group that they have yet to destroy – and more billions of dollars were spent for the war on Iraq, which proved nothing. He depleted your treasury.

What Bush is doing is creating a large deficit that your children have to pay off. Yes, he did some tax cuts. He also cut the wages of your soldiers who are dieing on a daily basis off in Iraq for no good reason. He declared the war over, but it’s not. People are still dieing. He didn’t think about the reparations. Why would he? He doesn’t care about his country.

The United States government has magically granted themselves the right to invade other people’s privacy because they are of a middle-East race, or because of their last name. I thought America was supposed to be walking away from the days of racist remarks, racial profiling and just plain idiocy.

What kind of president is allowing history to repeat itself in plain view of everyone? President George W Bush is, but who elected him in and who is still supporting him? Well, at the moment, more than half of the United States citizens.

The “Patriot Act”, named sole for the purpose of citizen approval, allows the government to secretly detain citizens without reason, deport any green-card carrying ‘aliens’, access confidential credit reports without a subpoena, apply strict gag rules for those subpoenas by a grand jury, collect DNA from suspected terrorists and anyone else who might assist in a terror investigation without court orders, erase the restrictions with the use of secret evidence as well as many other freedom-stripping actions.

Bush spent all August vacationing… In his term of presidency, we can remember all of his public announcements and appearances, because he’s done so few in comparison to all other presidents.

He acted against the United Nations after asking permission. He dissolved more international treaties that any other president and currently, you only have three allies left in the United Nations.

Over 71% of the people in Europe view Bush’s presidency as the biggest threat to world peace and stability in the world. He set the record for demonstrators – over 15 million protestors stood in the streets all across the world to protest against himself, and rightfully so.

The list of things that Bush has done wrong during his presidency us so long, I can’t even begin to finish it.

Some sites you should check out:

Atlanta.craigslist.org

“I have removed more freedoms and civil liberties from Americans than any other president in US history. In a little over two years I have created the most divided country in decades, possibly the most divided that the US has been since the civil war.”

Bushin30seconds.com

“Freedom should have limits…"

BLA BLA BLA.

They didnt lie at all, just because I cant find dog shit on my lawn doesnt mean dogs dont shit there.

Simple fact; Sadam needed removing whether or not he had weapons of mass destruction.

Simple fact; It was not Americas job to remove him.

Maybe he invented some excuses, maybe he shouldn't have done that. Now he has a lot of fur in his tonge, but I really don't know, it is up to the people to say what is wrong with a president, I think.

- Edited By Chewbacca On Sat 24th, Jan 2004 @ 6:57:44pm

for those who say bush is bad........ check ya self......yes he is president.......but if his staff and his leaders thought he was wrong they would of impeeched him.

secondly, if we didnt remove him no one would have and if you honestly think he should been left alone to stock pile up his future nukes you can jump off a cliff cause I told you to and since you live in a box and you think your safe then this will prove it hurts when you land.

Nibbler wrote: Simple fact; It was not Americas job to remove him.

You honestly think the UN wouldve done anything? Saddam needed removing for the history he's smashed onto his servants; his people. He killed his own, he tortured his own, he made sure he wont elections and he was just a terrible dictator.

Im sure its easy for you to sit there and go 'its not our business'. Well think about it this way, if you was under saddams rule and your family have been killed, tortured, raped, bullied and god knows what; would you object to bush coming to remove his ass? I know I wouldnt.

I believe that Sadam needed to be removed, as do many other oppressive leaders in the world today, and until this is done we cannot have a hope of long-term peace in the world. However, the fact still remains that like many politicians, Bush is a sneaky little bastard and he should have realised that people were more likely to accept the invasion of Iraq if he didn't emphasize the "weapons of mass destruction" argument, and focused on the fact that for a large part it was a mission of liberation.

But then you have to remember that the US put Sadam into power in the first place, not thinking about the future, so where does that leave us with Iraq at the moment? Did they plan things properly this time?

I guess only time will tell...

-jEFF

BlueWolf72 wrote: for those who say bush is bad........ check ya self......yes he is president.......but if his staff and his leaders thought he was wrong they would of impeeched him.

secondly, if we didnt remove him no one would have and if you honestly think he should been left alone to stock pile up his future nukes you can jump off a cliff cause I told you to and since you live in a box and you think your safe then this will prove it hurts when you land.

his cabinet? impeach him? you mean the people in his company? the ones who have massive amounts of stock in halliburton? the company that was assured contracts to rebuild Iraq after the war? pfft, YOU NEED to get your head checked.

besides, if we impeach him, the next person in is cheney, the CEO of halliburton. no thanks...

and azz0r, did we remove castro? anything bad happen with him in power? we meddled in affairs we did not belong to. we are not the worlds policemen. If you're gonna say "saddam killed thousands of people!!" take tha number, quadruple it, and that the number of innocent people the US has killed over a shorter span of time by dropping bombs on the country. WEEKLY. is that justice?

"Im sure its easy for you to sit there and go 'its not our business'. Well think about it this way, if you was under saddams rule and your family have been killed, tortured, raped, bullied and god knows what; would you object to bush coming to remove his ass? I know I wouldnt."

It is our business, and it makes me mad when you presume that people are happy that the US has done. Think about it, are there not terrorist attacks raging in Iraq? Isn't that a big enough sign that THINGS ARE NOT OK?

The us was in it for the oil, the oil they steal. Do you think that Iraq won't have to pay for this war because of all the oil the us gets? I don't think so, the USA will squeeze every penny from Iraq and then demand more.

Iraq only has one country to blame for everything that has happened since Saddam was put in place, America. For putting Saddam in power in the first place, and supplying him with weapons of mass destruction, and for the war, and now for the civil unrest.

Now, how is having a dictator any worse than having a leader like bush who gives so little support to the working classes that each year more and more people end up homeless? These people DIE for the sake of his profit and the profit of the big businesses.

DO NOT VOTE FOR GEORGE BUSH???

well.....it SEEMS he became the US President even though he DID NOT get the greater amount of votes.....CONGRESS put him in the office, NOT the American citizens.

anybody have a problem with that???

didn't think so.

Come on! For christsake the man can not even SPEAK english. He doesn't even have a basic understanding of grammar. He is a nit-wit, Daddy's boy who was groomed to be a FRONT for his daddy and his daddy's team mates.

'tis a dangerous business going on here. very, very dangerous.

So, to the rest of the world it looks like the American people MUST be followers of this Living Idiot (I hate him so bad I could explode).

Yes, there are the gung ho dim-wit Americans who don't know their butts from their heads who are blind and ...well, frankly I don't get it. It's kind of like the jock thing...like it's a ball team or something. Like, we have to root for OUR team and Bush is the Coach so we can't go against the coach and the coach is always right.

Bush has not done one thing FOR the Americans. Not One Thing!!! Except everything he can to destroy not only THIS country but the entire World.

He...and all the politicians are very, very dangerous indeed and care not for anyone not in power. It's all just a game...a big, bad game.

They can destroy us because we are all so apathetic. We only care about our own little boxes we live and work in...it's the old "well...what can I do about it, anyway" syndrome.

Tis a sad state of affairs.

Yes, thats good!

PROTEST!

People need to learn to think for themselfes again and go out and QUESTION their leaders motives instead of just accepting that all will be well in the end because all will not be well in the end!

I'm glad to see not every one in the world are brain washed idiots. One thing you guys over looked. George bush the first is head of the CIA. Do you know what the CIA does? It deals friggen drugs! Back when the DEA was new they were haveing shootouts with the CIA because they were making drug busts and the CIA were the people selling the drugs! Not only that but the bush family also funded hitler in the 30's. I hope I don't sound like a conspiricy theorist, because all the stuff is true. Also, what did Dick chainy (spelling) order the U.S. troops to protect when there was mass rioting? The musiums? The schools? Of coarse not! that would be usefull to the populess. The Oil feilds! These are evil people. And the democrats are a friggen comody act! I say vote third party. If every one votes third party, then there will be blatent lieing going on to re-elect George Bush II.

Another great post!

azz0r: Enough 'if's I'm not under Saddams rule and neither are you so you can't even HOPE to tell us what its like.

I mean, yes saddam was evil, and yes he needed to be removed, but they could have sent in assasens if they wanted him dead. The attacked Iraq for the oil! And no other reson, the people there know it, and that's why they're killing americans. Think about it, 500 americans have died since the war "ended". That's alot to die when theres "no war" going on. Ohnestly! Come on!

Even better, so far we know this:

- the USA attacked Iraq for oil.
- they don't give a damn about people in Iraq (let alone their OWN country)
- Bush has a criminal record.
- the CIA are/did deal drugs.
- Bush was wrongfully elected.

That will do for now I think.

Obsydian wrote: ...If you're gonna say "saddam killed thousands of people!!" take tha number, quadruple it, and that the number of innocent people the US has killed over a shorter span of time by dropping bombs on the country. WEEKLY. is that justice?

Try "no"... Sadam has been directly or indirectly responsible for FAR more deaths than the US invasion caused. However, this said, I don't believe they went about it in the right way; screw weapons of mass destruction, they even knew they didn't have them. With today's satellite technology, surely they could track Sadam after he made a public appearance, then accurately bomb where he was. You'd think there would be a lot less resistance once he was dead...

:/

-jEFF

Nibbler wrote: Even better, so far we know this:

- the USA attacked Iraq for oil.
- they don't give a damn about people in Iraq (let alone their OWN country)
- Bush has a criminal record.
- the CIA are/did deal drugs.
- Bush was wrongfully elected.

That will do for now I think.

you can add the US backing Saddam's political reign in the seventies and arming him with weapons to help fight iranian contras. The US intelligence agencies shoot theirselves in the foot alot. I mean, we also supported Osama Bin Laden back in the days when russia invaded afghanistan.

and Psycho, if you think that then the media has brainwashed you good. watch MSNBC often? You do know that the media giant is owned by GE right? the company that makes military arms and aircraft? I'm sure they'd hate to see people die in a war... no matter how much it fattens their wallets....

another thing... during the afghanistan war, the UN would drop relief to the people. they used bright yellow packets with food and other such things in them. alot of children loved to pick them up and show it to their parents... unless it was a bright yellow US cluster bomb. since those things were relics alot of them didn't explode on impact... so we have a bright yellow object about the same size as the packets being dropped. so children were killed, mangled, or severely injured. It's nice to know that the US did the same thing in Iraq too. with the same bright yellow color.

DIE INNOCENT IRAQIS!!! DIE!!!! there we go, now i'm a patriot eh?

oh yeah, I never said the US "invasion" as you did, i said the bombs dropped over 10 years whenever the US felt like it. I said bombs, not invasion.

- Edited By Obsydian On Mon 26th, Jan 2004 @ 12:22:35am

Nibbler wrote: Another great post!

azz0r: Enough 'if's I'm not under Saddams rule and neither are you so you can't even HOPE to tell us what its like.

I dont need to throw ifs out, theyre facts, I was just trying to curve your views by letting you think of yourself being in that situation.

Wilhelm_III wrote: I'm glad to see not every one in the world are brain washed idiots. One thing you guys over looked. George bush the first is head of the CIA. Do you know what the CIA does? It deals friggen drugs! Back when the DEA was new they were haveing shootouts with the CIA because they were making drug busts and the CIA were the people selling the drugs! Not only that but the bush family also funded hitler in the 30's. I hope I don't sound like a conspiricy theorist, because all the stuff is true. Also, what did Dick chainy (spelling) order the U.S. troops to protect when there was mass rioting? The musiums? The schools? Of coarse not! that would be usefull to the populess. The Oil feilds! These are evil people. And the democrats are a friggen comody act! I say vote third party. If every one votes third party, then there will be blatent lieing going on to re-elect George Bush II.

a) Paragraphs
b) Spelling
c) Thats all bullshit

Nibbler wrote: Even better, so far we know this:

- the USA attacked Iraq for oil.
- they don't give a damn about people in Iraq (let alone their OWN country)
- Bush has a criminal record.
- the CIA are/did deal drugs.
- Bush was wrongfully elected.

That will do for now I think.

- Says you.
- Thats funny, why do you think this??
- OH NOES!!111 99% of the pop does
- History, doesnt mean they still do
- I like how you can pull complete bullshit out your arse to prove non-existant facts

- Edited By azz0r On Mon 26th, Jan 2004 @ 8:22:10am

1, well what else are they getting out of it?
2, your joking right?
3, if I remember correctly, people with a record are not allowed to vote or run for presidency.
4, like I said, 'are/did'.
5, have you bothered to look at the facts?

Stop accusing me of pulling shit out of my ass just because I CARE about MY FUTURE.

azz0r wrote: c) Thats all bullshit

So you're saying that they are not stealing Iraqi oil? You're telling me that Iraq won't owe some huge debt for this war?

- Edited By Nibbler On Mon 26th, Jan 2004 @ 4:11:31am

My god azz0r! How can you say this? Fine, you got me with A) and B) but C) is wrong! Do you live in america? Have you researched any of this? At all? Comr back when you have proof that I'm wrong, because I can supplie proof I'm right.

... have you seen the other cantidates? George Bush dosent look so bad next to them :/
also probably about 90 percent of the stuff you hear from the public including local news, international news, every internet website, and the government is not proven.

- Edited By hatel3reed On Mon 26th, Jan 2004 @ 10:43:54pm

Ahh, but all my info is from books. And as I said in an earlier post, the democrates have become a comody act.

Semantics, and I wont get into them. You can make any argument boring by bringing up points you cant prove.

If we where at war, and language was a weapon, you would have lost by now.