cSuTsOtRoYm Actually Remastered mod for Amnesia: The Dark Descent

MAN SHUT YO NEGATIVE PESSIMISTIC *** UP 🤣🤣🤣🤣

isnt that good right? content is content

Going to a widely popular restaurant where you have to wait for an hour for the best meal of your life vs going to a messy pub where they instantly serve you something from the nearby trash can. Suit yourself I guess

I think the Amnesia community suffers from toxicity far more than from poor mods. Everyone has the right to develop individually. Some can do small things, some big. Far more beneficial for the community are experienced modders, who try to help beginners than would-be objective critics who just drop beginners' confidence and demotivate them for further work. What is called low quality accompanies us throughout life. Just as you can go to a restaurant for bad food, you can also get a book or movie of low quality that is easily available. The further development of the Amnesia community requires mutual cooperation and quality interpersonal relationships. If I think someone is doing something wrong, I try to help him and support him. No one don't want shock treatment (respective toxicity).

1. They have rights to make, we have rights to rate
2. It's easy to distinguish beginner mods from effortless mods. Even by the length and attitude for example but there are many more factors.
3. Low scores exist for a reason. The justification is far more important. If someone gets demotivated because their average score is below 8.0 - they better give up
4. I've helped a bunch of people myself. Maybe even "gave" them impressive modding skills. You improve by fixing mistakes so by saying "everything aight you did great job" you only make them stuck in a belief they've reached the top. Thus things like"thehappymatt incident" happen
5. Your review on shyrtexx's mod

Everyone has the right to give rating and have opinion, but it is important in what form such an opinion is given. Every freedom of speech has its limits. Unfortunately, people have quite different views on this, which is exactly what causes frequent problems. I think that every reasonable person knows the difference between constructive criticism and obvious toxicity. Let everyone rate the mods as they wish, but let's refrain from any aggressive manifestations. If a creator can't cope with the level of his rating, it's just his personal problem. But that doesn't mean that we will treat him uncivilized. If we'll bring passive aggression into the community disguised as an objective opinion instead of a constructive approach, we'll not achieve anything positive.

If someone wants to do mods effortlessly, it is their right and free choice. Who can predict whether a person who makes mods effortlessly will one day become a good creator? Helping such people is the key to success. We can offer help to such people in a civilized way, not to force it on them or even to use inappropriate comparisons to poor food.