Atheists, Agnostics, and Anti-theists of ModDB
Educational
A group for those without religion, as well as those who oppose it. Atheism and Agnosticism and Anti-theism.
atheism isnt a religion
(view original)
Post a comment
Description
This is for all those who think atheism is a relgion
ATHEISM
Repeat with me
A-T-H-E-I-S-M
Dere juts hsa dyslexai
poor comparison
actually its a perfect comparison. religion= hair
lack of any hair =athiesm.
its one of the most perfect metaphors i have ever seen.
Atheism is not a religion, but the orgins theory as most atheists believe is not science but religion.
What "origins" theory? Evolution, Accretion, Abiogenesis and the Big Bang are all science, not religion.
creationists dont know what scientifiv theory means, they think it means the same thing as theory does in laymans terms
All of them are unobservable AND have problems.
"All of them are unobservable AND have problems."
We all think the same thing about you, but that doesn't mean you don't exist :S
Just accept science into your heart...
I like science, a lot:) however science cannot prove orgins, the best we can do is interpet the facts and come up with an idea. That doesn't mean the idea is right, it is just an interpetation of the facts. To find the truth we cannot rule out certain things, in other words we cannot be biased!
Heh what you said can be told 100% to christianity as well;) It cannot prove the origins and people only came up with an idea (or theroy) when they wrote bible;).
Except Noah saw the flood happening he wrote down an accurate observation of that event. Just like a bunch of other stuff was witnessed.
Your funny my friend. The flood never happend for starters. It was a story made up by some guy to make god seem kind and ****. What he didn't realize was that he made god seem like an extremist.
Anyways, the flood never, ever, happen. People like you blindly believe it did without even asking the true people who have knowledge about your faith. True religious people (aka, priests and ****) know that it is symbolic. For that I respect those people.
FYI: For 10 years of my life I was in a religious school so ik what I'm talking about, just that don't feel like explaining it in an "elite" form cause I'm lazy.
Youtube.com
I suggest putting God's authority above the authority of humans, since there is a bunch of evidences supporting the global flood. Please spare 1hr and watch that video.
but god doesn't exsist. And I surely can't put more authority to something that doesn't exsist then to humans.
And no that is a bs video that you creationists keep putting together out of your *** trying to desperatly convert even more people to you.
fine stay blind!
Elf: No, you don't like science. You hate science. You fight science.
"All of them are unobservable AND have problems. "
All of them are observable (and observed).
Have you tried reading the dozens of articles that point out the MASSIVE problems of your theory about orgins?
http://creation.mobi/startling-plant-discovery-presents-problems-for-evolution
http://creation.mobi/loopholes-in-the-evolutionary-theory-of-the-origin-of-life-summary
http://creation.mobi/origin-of-life-questions-and-answers
https://www.moddb.com/groups/christians-of-moddb/images/evolution-requires-blind-faith
he wont listen, he believes the flood was real, and he can't be shown reality.
kinda like my schizophrenic relative when she is off her meds.
funny fact, shes only a christain when her christain isnt under control
otherwise she's an athiest... wonder if there is a connection there.
correction condition under control not christain under control
oops, my bad
now remember kiddies this is why you dont take acid, lol.
here i will post the link again onehy the flood and noahs ark wouldnt work.
1.bp.blogspot.com
The animals ATE grass (they were all vegetarians) remember I pointed out the vegetarian lion?
You are so dumb...
because i point out the stuff that are hidden?
Just to point it complete it: a lion that eats grass is an evidence for evolution. A mutation that allows the lion to eat grass unless he gets sick of it and dies eventually, than you have the dawrin award for animalic stupidity. Its natural selection in action.
Besides, cats need to eat SOME grass for their digestion, if its not his main food.
same could be said about every fact. it could support either evolution, or creation. however this is my LAST debating post on this page, all the other ones will be on https://www.moddb.com/groups/religion-society-debates
Atheism is still a religion by definition. A belief that a group of people follow. Ie, the belief that "there is no God".
A non-belief is not religion, just like a non-smoker is not a smoker.
Wrong. The lack of belief in god DISQUALIFIES it as religion.
Its impossible to "lack belief". You BELIEVE that "there is no God". Because you do not know and cannot prove it it is a belief.
A religion is defined by the belief in a supernatural being. The non-belief in any being of that kind is simply not a religion at all.
The existence of a god cannot be proven so the non-existence is automatically proven.
That is certainly one definition of "religion"; but then, it is not the only one.
True, religion has many defination, but as far as I noticed none of them refer to atheism.
Atheism is as much of a belief as not collecting stamps is a hobby. So No, it's not impossible, you're just too ******* stupid to understand it.
You call me stupid, yet such a simple concept like what I'm trying to explain goes right over your head.
Your lack of bwainz is disturbing.
Your concept is lacking of logic. For the last time, its not "I believe there is no god" its "I dont believe in gods or supernatural beings". The first could be religious, like scientology or nature religions. The last one indicates atheism and seperates it from all beliefs.