sign me the FUCK up good shit go౦ԁ sHit thats ✔ some goodshit right th ere right✔there ✔if i do ƽaү so my selｆ i say so thats what im talking about right there right there (chorus: ʳᶦᵍʰᵗ ᵗʰᵉʳᵉ) mMMMMМ
I have created some videos showing off Brood War mechanics and briefly describing them.
In this video, I demonstrate how Brood War keeps units formations consistent and clean. Brood War kept it's formations very consistent by offsetting the unit's target order point by the distance they are from the center of the group they are in when being ordered. The group is determined by what the current selection is upon issuing an order.
This is my recreation of Brood War's formation mechanics. The code can be easily translated to almost any other engine and language. The biggest thing you'll have to do is slightly rework how you get the order points of each individual unit because they use WarCraft III's built in polar coordinate point system.
Ignore what I actually say in this video, most of it is wrong. Units do not wait the period before firing, they wait the Damage Point before firing then wait the Period again before waiting the Damage Point again to fire again. Everything else is just kind of rambling without much of a point.
This is a follow up to the previous video, showing how my modifications to SC2's system, SC2's base system, and Brood War's systems all compare in terms of micro and efficiency.
That's about it!
He makes some very good points here.
There is a REAL demand for Classic, Vanilla WoW servers to play the old versions of the game that people will have a funner time playing.
I don't even play WoW. I never liked WoW. But this is a pretty universal idea, here. Blizzard is a titan of a company. They have more money coming out of their money-stained anuses then they know what to do with. They can put up some Classic/Vanilla WoW servers, or hell let the people from Nostalrius set up and run the servers for them without even paying them and charge the people who play on it subscription fees! Why deny people something they want, something they know they want, something that 850,000 people were totally okay with and played on a regular daily basis. Why do this? It's stupid, if you ask me.
Okay, so, I've been considering making a game for a few months now. I've looked through lots of things, and have determine the bulk of my knowledge in games is under these 4 categories.
(TBoI = The Binding of Isaac)
Over the past 5 or so years, these are the types of games I've been playing. Me being hyper-critical and looking into details, I've been able to come across a lot of knowledge for these. So I'm curious, out of these which do you all think I could do the best?
As a bonus, here is a teaser of some of my knowledge explaining why I don't think Larva Inject in StarCraft II is a good mechanic.
Okay, so please keep in mind these are my opinions. Blizzard has no intention of messing with Macro Mechanics again, this much is obvious, but i never really got to say my opinion on the subject. So let's just keep this to fun and games.
I'm posting this here because hopefully this is a lot less bias than traditional General Chat (God I hope so anyway). This is copy/pasted from another thread though.
So, let's take the time to explain why Larva Inject is a bad mechanic the way it stands (The idea itself can work and StarBow is proof of this). It's a bit of an in-depth reason and it takes more than just saying "because it's useless clicks" but that is a glaring issue. The biggest issue, however, is fundamentally it does not fit Zerg's identity. The main problems as to why Larva Inject is the way it is seem purely due to a lack of understanding of the source material.
When we look at a lot of mechanics in BW, we see a lot of them have an underlining theme. They don't just require player input to work effectively. They take decision making. Simply pressing buttons that you have to press did not do everything for you like Larva Inject or MULEs do, you had to know what you were doing.
That is, the things that weren't purely technical limitations of the game such as selecting 12 units or 1 building at a time or the very small amount of the map shown on the screen at one time which were there not as a design choice, or at least not purely as a design choice, but because it was left-over code from WC2 that they did not have the time or interest to change.
What are examples of this claim? Let's look at how Zerg is different from BW to SC2 in terms of macro. Hatcheries were slowly added on over the course of a game, usually maxing out at 6 to 8. But there is a choice in this, the choice to either tech or throw down another Hatchery. It wasn't uncommon for a Zerg to skip an expansion or macro hatch and instead go purely for quick tech in hopes of tech-smashing the opponent (A tactic very common in the C&C series, as well). This element can be reflected into both Terran and Protoss, though it wasn't as viable.
But why does Larva Inject provide no tactical or strategic importance like this and why is this more important than what Larva Inject does? Larva Inject boils down to being a limiting factor for Zerg. Unlike macro hatches, which were a heavy investment and could be chosen against, Queen Larva Inject has neither of these factors going for it. Instead, it is a requirement to effectively play the race as well as results in numerous units being rendered cost and/or supply inefficient, which is the exact opposite of what Zerg's original identity was. The majority of units were generally efficient in either cost or supply or both, but because they were so cheap, and stats being addressed accordingly to this cheapness, they were still dealt with even in huge numbers. Why is this important when we look at SC2, though? It's a different game, after all. The answer to that is simple. We cannot exceed the predecessor if we do not understand why the predecessor worked. When we can understand this, we can understand how to make a sequel that is different and make it work. This is something that Larva Inject completely fails on.
Larva Inject is a complete misunderstanding of what made Zerg work in the previous installment. Zerg did not work because they could produce tons of units really quickly. Zerg worked because they had highly cost-efficient units that could be produced kind of quickly. Larva Inject, contrarily in SC2, fails at this entirely by producing units too fast and making too many at one time. This resulting in units having to be toned down, which gives a wealth of other problems. Look at how StarBow's Larva Inject works. It is significantly better design wise because it slowly trickles in Larva. It has a bonus for having a lot less maintenance. As well, the Queen has an ability that increases the construction speed of buildings, breaking the second-biggest problem with macro hatches in SC2 - they take too long to build. So you could choose to go with Larva Injects, or make more Macro Hatches. (The other problem with Macro Hatches in SC2 is fixed as well but it's fixed by completely rebuilding the game from the ground-up, it cannot be bandaided easily though I won't say it's impossible.)
Larva Inject has no tactical or strategic purpose. It serves as a dump to raise the difficulty floor, which is something that should be as low as possible, and actually lowers the difficulty ceiling, something that should be as high as possible (Or at least with my understanding of an E-Sport which I will admit is lacking compared to actual game design). The complete removal of Larva Inject, as well as some buffs to Macro Hatches and rebalancing across the board for Zerg units (Totally not hard to do as long as you got the right picture in mind), would see Zerg being more Zergy and less death bally. There would be more time to focus on multiple points across the map as a Zerg.
So, the main points here:
1. Larva Inject is more of a hindrance than beneficial.
2. The way Larva Inject works is a clear misinterpretation of Zerg's identity. (There is absolutely NO reason to change their identity. You can change up all their mechanics all you want, hell you could even remove Larva and Zerg could still work, but changing their identity is something that should never be touched. You'd be better off making a new race.)
3. Larva Inject is pointless clicks, it makes a hard entry-point barrier but makes Zerg easier than BW once you get the hang of it, which is the exact-opposite of what Blizzard and the community as a whole wants.
4. Remove the Baneling, Widow Mine, and Disruptor.
Well, even though I tried as hard as possible to make it descriptive and objective, this is still rather weak and bias. But it should still at least get the point across. I have no hopes Blizzard will actually fix these issues that I see, but at least it is good knowledge to pass on for the future.
I'm gonna try and do ... Something here to help out. Spreading the word can really do that. This is a very, very important thing. I really can't explain it well, but this video does it EXTREMELY well.
*Drool* Good music *Drool*
There's SO MUCH MORE, but these are my favorites.
Approaching Nirvana is a small 2-man group. I don't know a whole lot about them, as I have only recently started listening. Whenever I take the time to learn more, I might edit this blog with more info.
In the mean time, I'll talk about the music. It's great electro/dubstep, real electro/dubstep. This isn't the generic WUB shit, this is actually very complex music that you have to listen to multiple times to hear everything, to fully experience it, and to feel the emotions it's giving you.
I can't actually figure out how to input these "IFrame" videos, but oh my god...
This is absolutely amazing, and it's called yellowBird.
I don't have anything else to say other than this is absolutely amazing...There's no way to describe it in any other way possible.
Just...Just watch, read, and laugh at how stupid bill-makers are getting these days.
TotalHalibut - Used Games
Steam can be a a huge distribution method, I feel like the consumer on Steam should have the ability to sell the games they bought back to the developer, so people can buy that used, discounted copy from the developer. Edit: Maybe for it being "Used", the CD Key can't be used for online play due to it already being activated.
Ad space for Servers in games can help a lot for server support. This would have to be tinkered with.
Microsoft and Sony should develop a platform like Steam for the next-gen consoles.
With Valve hopefully making a console soon, they can help the Console-market with Used Games sale, again combined with the consumer being able to sell the game they don't want anymore back to the original developer or publisher.
It's very simple to set up, it is!
Firstly, you need to set all the basic flat terrain (Not cliffs, water or waterfalls) to this
Morphable = True
This tag does 2 things, it stops the tile from changing it's height and it stops other tiles from overriding it.
Next, copy the entry for GAPAVE from Tiberian Sun from Rules.ini and Art.ini and paste it over to RA2. Next, make sure the ToTile= tag is set to Pvclr01 so it doesn't look ugly. If you set it to PAVE01, it doesn't edge out the Terrain.
This works in RA2, and YR and allows pavement to be placed on most flat terrain just like in TS!
This is a list of which quotes I like better for the unit, from SC1 or SC2.
Marine - SC2.
Firebat - SC2.
Goliath - SC1.
Vulture - SC1.
Wraith - SC2.
Battlecruiser - SC2.
Science Vessel - SC1.
Ghost - SC1.
Medic - SC2.
Siege Tank - SC1.
All in all, I have mixed feelings about the unit quotations in SC2.
No blogs were found matching the criteria specified. We suggest you try the blog list with no filter applied, to browse all available. Join now to share your own content, we welcome creators and consumers alike and look forward to your comments.