The Debating Society
Hobbies & Interests
A place where ModDB members can debate civilly, and learn from each other's views.
Should A-holes be allowed to have Human rights?
(view original)
Post a comment
Description
The story: Moviepilot.com
So how do we decide who is an A-hole or isn't one? See what I'm getting at? It would be a great system if judgement was correctly done but that won't happen therefore to avoid mistreating some people that don't deserve to be mistreated we need to grant everyone human rights :(
Yes, as long as they don't step on the rights* of other humans.
*As written in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Human rights should be granted to those who respect them and for those who don't, it should be "balanced" according to what part did they "disrespected"
Well duh, Universal Human rights are Universal.
Yes they should, but it's normal to feel sometimes they don't deserve them.
It depends, with A-holes do you mean an ignorant/arrogant/unrespectful idiot or a murderer?
The first one didn't kill anyone. He may be an A-hole and a 'racist' person, but at least he didn't kill anyone.
The second one deprived a Human Being (Living being) of its right to live because of petty reasons.
Depends. By the typical definition of 'a person who is a ****', they should have rights. However, if by arsehole we mean criminals, certain rights and liberties should be denied as part of their prison sentence.
What an absolute ****. How extreme was that response or what? The simple answer is "Yes". All because someone hurt your feelings doesn't mean we should deny them their rights.