A place where ModDB members can debate civilly, and learn from each other's views.

  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
  • View media
RSS feed Report content Should A-holes be allowed to have Human rights? (view original)
Should A-holes be allowed to have Human rights?
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Tweet Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
ElfFriend Creator
ElfFriend Apr 15 2014 says:

So how do we decide who is an A-hole or isn't one? See what I'm getting at? It would be a great system if judgement was correctly done but that won't happen therefore to avoid mistreating some people that don't deserve to be mistreated we need to grant everyone human rights :(

+2 votes   reply to comment
Kalga Creator
Kalga Apr 15 2014 says:

Yes, as long as they don't step on the rights* of other humans.

*As written in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

+4 votes   reply to comment
TyXo Apr 15 2014 says:

Human rights should be granted to those who respect them and for those who don't, it should be "balanced" according to what part did they "disrespected"

+2 votes     reply to comment
Cervi_Messias Creator
Cervi_Messias Apr 15 2014 says:

Well duh, Universal Human rights are Universal.

+1 vote   reply to comment
elMengu Apr 16 2014 says:

Yes they should, but it's normal to feel sometimes they don't deserve them.

+1 vote     reply to comment
TheTriangulum Creator
TheTriangulum Apr 16 2014 says:

I never knew there was an impartial omnibenevolent human who could judge whose rights go to who. Please introduce him/her to me.

Aside from my sarcasm :P srsly it is inane for such actions to be allowed no matter how A-holeish someone may come across to be. Usually A-holeish behaviour is collectively looked down upon in society already and hence no need for an authority body to strip their rights.

+2 votes   reply to comment
BioDestroyer Apr 16 2014 says:

It depends, with A-holes do you mean an ignorant/arrogant/unrespectful idiot or a murderer?

The first one didn't kill anyone. He may be an A-hole and a 'racist' person, but at least he didn't kill anyone.

The second one deprived a Human Being (Living being) of its right to live because of petty reasons.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Spudman619 Apr 16 2014 says:

Depends. By the typical definition of 'a person who is a ****', they should have rights. However, if by arsehole we mean criminals, certain rights and liberties should be denied as part of their prison sentence.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Cure Optimism
Cure Optimism Apr 20 2014 says:

What an absolute ****. How extreme was that response or what? The simple answer is "Yes". All because someone hurt your feelings doesn't mean we should deny them their rights.

+1 vote     reply to comment
Post a comment

You are not logged in, your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account:


The story: Moviepilot.com

Apr 15th, 2014
Embed Thumb
RSS feed