Posts | ||
---|---|---|
Genetic Diversity | Locked | |
Thread Options | ||
Aug 21 2002 Anchor | ||
We come to learn how to farm our animals now, but is this drying up the gene pool? In the future, will our farm animals be more exposed to disease? We now need a greater amount of animals to feed the people, and drying up the gene pool is not helping. We should be taking action now! -- We are Geelong, the greatest team of all |
||
Aug 21 2002 Anchor | ||
First off genetic enginering would improve animals health - there would be numerous changes to there immune system through engineering to ensure they are a better 'product'. How are we drying up the gene pool exactly?? Simply put if some wacko in a lab wants to create a new animal in say 15years it would probably be possible. For example a company is working on breeding sheep with spiders to create a twine that is 100 X more stronger than anything in exsistance - spidersheep anyone? As for mass feeding and cloning to help - more than likely. However USA in particular makes enough surplus to feed its own country. The UK on the other hand doesnt make a surplus on its meat and crop - thus cloning would probably be used lightly in the future. If you was refering to Ethopians and such : I doubt they can afford the technology, and I cant see the west having another loan for them. -- Why wont it save me? |
||
Aug 22 2002 Anchor | ||
It's funny how few people connect this issue of genetic diversity to the human race as well. -- Josh Bush |
||
Aug 22 2002 Anchor | ||
Indeed, but its the very nature of humans to make things revolve around themselves. -- Why wont it save me? |
||
Aug 22 2002 Anchor | ||
don't ask me what i was on when i posted this... anyway, farmers only get the best animals to breed, and thus the genetic diversity is limited to those animals. thats what i was getting at... -- We are Geelong, the greatest team of all |
||
Aug 22 2002 Anchor | ||
the best animals would have the best genes then, aswell so wheres the problem -- "What is it that we're struggling for? Blood and Tears, Sentenced |
||
|
Aug 22 2002 Anchor | |
Where's the problem? Well they are pushing and selecting which animals do and don't reproduce. So while one cow may produce some creamy milk, it maybe prone to some critical diease another 'rejected' cow was not. Hence in the future this may indeed pose a massive problem
Damn, would not wanna get bitten by one of those sheep, would wind up like spiderman -- Scott Reismanis |
||
Aug 22 2002 Anchor | ||
lol ye, but think of the benefits...they could make a new material (twine/cotton to such an intense degree) that has never ever existed but splicing a few genes -- Why wont it save me? |
||
Aug 22 2002 Anchor | ||
did you guys hear about the spider they genetically joined with a goat? how stupid is that? a silk/milk-making animal -- We are Geelong, the greatest team of all |
||
Aug 23 2002 Anchor | ||
thats what I was on about ! -- Why wont it save me? |
||
Aug 23 2002 Anchor | ||
"The best animal has the best genes" That's not how it works. Being a bit of a humanitarian, I think this is horrid when coupled with the fact that 90% of these animals don't exactly get what I'd call a happy life. Oh, and "Only the farmers get the best animals to breed with" sounds just a littttttttle sus. -- Josh Bush |
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.