Posts | ||
---|---|---|
Mod Database Version 2 | Locked | |
Thread Options | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 66 | |
|
Apr 16 2003 Anchor | |
Ok this may come as a bit of a shock to you however I shall shortly commence creating Version 2 of the modDB which may as well be an entire recode. Firstly, don't expect to see anything soon, this shall just be a part time task that I will put 10~15 minutes into everyday so I suspect it shall not be unveiled until the conclusion of this year. What will be different about the new version you ask? Pretty much everything, only with the basic underlying modDB structure underneth. The primary goal is to make this site more like a database. What I mean by that, is clear, clean and simple, yet shows all the details you want everytime. I am presently contemplating making the design skinnable... it be great to do so, but I do not believe it is really essential. Instead i am going to strive to create an image independent design that looks funky thanks to some nice CSS work So yeah it'll be damn quick to download, and easy to follow. Here are all the major changes planned
Now, this means that changes to this site will be seldom if at all... I shall address the last remaining requests of features but unless something important comes up it shall be ignored (until version 2 anyhow). Rest assured all my loyal forum posters, (yes you!) shall be the first to view and test it when it is able to be viewed. Now the purpose of this thread, is to a). suggest things you would like to see in the new version and b). MORE IMPORTANTLY, suggest things you think the modDB presently does that a). you reckon can be done better, or b). are just usless and should go... I have a fair vision in my mind of what I am creating but all suggestions are welcome! -- Scott Reismanis |
||
|
Apr 16 2003 Anchor | |
if u get rid of dots, can i keep mine to look cool? most of the things that i think would be cool have already been suggested... random colours would be pimp, the in site irc room... file server... a server section, that shows members on (if possible) or just number of ppl... i dunno, some stuff like that -- ___________________________
|
||
|
Apr 16 2003 Anchor | |
An aim which I reckon i will be able to easily achieve with this new site is 50% cut down in bandwidth useage and I mean the site already is running pretty damn well, so yeah this new version should be awesome -- Scott Reismanis |
||
Apr 16 2003 Anchor | ||
I think the color scheme looks cool already, but if you are ready for a facelift then by all means go ahead. The things PF mentioned are cool, and using css would probably save a lot of little details and redundancies. |
||
|
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | |
I am very happy about those cut-downs, as alot of my bandwith seems to just disappear after forum posting. Were the hell did you learn CSS?! |
||
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | ||
CSS? Style sheets? They're not hard. |
||
|
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | |
|
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | |
The new version of the site will be 100% color customisable... therefore if you like the grays, well you shall be seeing a gray site! You may even like blue and white... there will be options Oh and I am thinking of making it so that if you visit classic.moddb.com you would see the old design.. however some of the changes such as the user permission would mean that would not work, so unfortunatly that may not be an option -- Scott Reismanis |
||
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | ||
Oooh color options eh? Honestly INtense I don't see how this site could get any better, but if you want to tinker with it then by all means, tinker away! |
||
|
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | |
|
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | |
|
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | |
user selectable colour schemes eh? nice. I wanna keep the dots , or maybe something like: split extra functions into levels like present |
||
|
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | |
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | ||
Assigned dots. Everyone else has no dots, why would a peon need a dot? Dots should be there to show power. Changes Id like, well for starters the colour thing is wicked, but really I think you could just hax and fix bugs and add some other features and modDDB would become version 2 pretty easily. -- Why wont it save me? |
||
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | ||
A proper logo! Imagine a symbol, possibly mascot orientated that you could just instantly recognize something is modDB related, a font with words really doesnt count as a logo! -- Why wont it save me? |
||
|
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | |
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | ||
|
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | |
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | ||
But changable dots. -- Why wont it save me? |
||
|
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | |
i do do news... does do do make sense? it all depends on if it's coded by section (news, forums, features, mods, users etc.) or if it's much more by actual action (auth news, write feature, ban user, edit user, edit posts, delete posts, award awards, add logos...) |
||
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | ||
no, thats somewhat rediculous, I don't think that would be reasonable either :/ that would require a hell of alot of people |
||
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | ||
How about gold chains instead of dots? I'm hesitant to leave my beloved gray scheme, but skinnability is cool. --
|
||
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | ||
Why is it? the colours wouldnt be that extreme but it means INtense could make SA a news and mod auther but not a forum mod or member editor, would make the site more areable and clean. -- Why wont it save me? |
||
|
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | |
tbh I like the present system, you know exactly who can do what. The other benefit of the present system over the proposed one is, for example, any of the mod team can clear the news auth list instead of having to wait for a news admin to sort it. |
||
Apr 17 2003 Anchor | ||
True dat, but it would make more focus, like INtense could assign a list of 4 people for the forum, 3people for news, 5 people for modification. They could overlap. They both have ups and downs. -- Why wont it save me? |
Only registered members can share their thoughts. So come on! Join the community today (totally free - or sign in with your social account on the right) and join in the conversation.