Post news Report RSS Exploding Things

We've introduced locational damage for our vehicles, which will make tank combat more interesting and dynamic. We've also got some new destruction animations for the latest buildings. Plus some infantry teaser news!

Posted by on

Instead of me posting an update for APB the past couple of weekends, we had TruYuri and ChopBam both give you some pretty informative blogs on what we've been looking into, and I ended up doing a recap of the TSR release last week. If you haven't read them, take a look, there's good stuff there.

We've been talking about some rather ambitious plans to overhaul infantry and tank combat for A Path Beyond, which have actually been coming together quite well. I've alluded to being able to hide better with infantry, and ambush passing tanks. I'd like to explain how some of that works, now. A recent change Saberhawk made exposed tanks to the existing damage scaling subsystem, and a proof of concept was made shortly after. We then posted the following video to our ModDB and YouTube pages:

In the above example video, the Heavy Tank is set up to need just over four shots to destroy it. However, the tank has specific weak points. These numbers aren't final and are just there to illustrate the concept, and we're going to be conducting testing to find the right balance to reward ambushes and superior maneuvering/positioning -- without making tank battles end before they can really begin. The areas that take damage on the Heavy Tank are pretty well defined, however, and are about the same for Medium Tanks as well.

7WBzGo4.png

For the demonstration, the damage settings were as follows:

  • The green area, the main armor, receives 100% damage
  • The yellow area, the tracks, receives 150% damage
  • The red area on the top and rear receives 300% damage
  • The red area on the very bottom also receives 300% damage

The fuel barrels on the back themselves do not have any damage bonus, and actually partially obscure the main weakpoint of the tank. Splash damage is basically unaffected by this, so it does not matter whether your tank has its front or back facing a V2 explosion. This also means that you cannot simply multiply the damage a tank takes from a head-on shot by 3x to find the damage that would be dealt to its back, because some portion of the damage the front took was from splash damage; it will be a little bit less than 3x, therefore, in practice.
Last blog, we showed off the new helicopter refill pads. Bases will often have extra service depots and helicopter refill stations, to help you get ready for your next attack faster instead of spending time waiting in line. Cuddling, who's totally back now and it's awesome to have him around, has also made destruction animations for these. Have a look, they come complete with Cuddling's usual taste in music:


Keep in mind there will be sparks, fire, smoke, sounds, and the works when you see them in-game.So that's news on tanks and buildings, but we've also got some exciting changes that were successfully tested for the infantry aspect of the game. I won't go into it all right now, but hints are fun! If anybody was hoping for snipers to return, there is now a chance for a marksman sort of unit if it fits into the balance scheme well, although the days of "kiting" other soldiers while banging off easy headshots will remain a thing of the past. If anybody was hoping for an end to bunnyhopping as the dominant strategy, you're going to be pleasantly surprised at what we're testing. We'll have more on soldiers next week.

Post comment Comments
UsedC
UsedC - - 177 comments

(buried)

I don't really think that locational damage fits C&C style.

Reply Good karma Bad karma-6 votes
UsedC
UsedC - - 177 comments

Dislikes for having an opinion? ModDB in a nutshell.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Jeffman12
Jeffman12 - - 1,475 comments

This is typically how agree vs disagree systems work. These votes are for a critical standpoint. If "C&C shouldn't have hitboxes" had garnered significant support, the devs would be encouraged to look at it and possibly reevaluate the decision.

I for one think it's a move in the right direction as tank battles will no longer consist solely of two tanks revving back and forth constantly in a futile attempt to not get hit. There's more /strategy/ to a game derived from a strategy franchise. Now I just wish there was something done with infantry so they weren't just bunnyhopping healthbars with different flavored guns.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+5 votes
Chronojam Author
Chronojam - - 413 comments

People who love to bunnyhop are going to be very, very disappointed and will probably slam the "disagree" button hard when they see next week's update :)

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Chronojam Author
Chronojam - - 413 comments

It's OK for people to agree/disagree, but unfortunately the ModDB system hides posts by default if they are disagreed with enough. Since not everybody wants to make a post to say they agree/disagree they just use the +/- buttons.

Reply Good karma+2 votes
Glarg
Glarg - - 112 comments

It's not a "dislike"

It's a "I disagree with that opinion but feel no reason to make a post"

It's just how these things work.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Guest
Guest - - 689,484 comments

this makes it more interesting

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
mathwizi2005
mathwizi2005 - - 45 comments

well consider the fact that Tiberian Sun was SUPPOSE to have directional armor (taken straight from the devs themselves [Westwood o wo7])

it makes the RTS style more tactical then just unit spamming to hell

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Lavama
Lavama - - 199 comments

Destroying a Heavy in two hits...


OMGHAXORZNOOB1V1MEBROIPRORIP-*Is shot for insanity*

Looks nice. Should be interesting to see how quickly I can down those Reddies now.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Jeffman12
Jeffman12 - - 1,475 comments

Yes, quite refreshing that light tanks now stand a better chance when going head to head.

Although, I don't know if two hits is that great, I think the fire rate doesn't allow the tank the opportunity to turn away in time.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
Chronojam Author
Chronojam - - 413 comments

I think the firing rate might come down a little more for Medium/Heavy tanks compared to what you see in the video. It is pretty important to let people retaliate when attacked, after all. Don't worry about the numbers given in this update, they're just to illustrate the system. We're working with the testers to get a good balance on it right now.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
SC90
SC90 - - 132 comments

damn i have to play this sometime again :D used to play it few years ago -_- nice news!

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Tesel
Tesel - - 740 comments

will infantry with fast firing weapons gain same buff?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Chronojam Author
Chronojam - - 413 comments

Yes.

Reply Good karma+1 vote
Lucífer
Lucífer - - 3,393 comments

What's the point in the green if its not going to shave off at least 10% from full damage? Doesn't this just mean that all weapon damage has to be toned down to accommodate such wild percentages? Or are all the vehicles made out of aluminium?

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Jeffman12
Jeffman12 - - 1,475 comments

I always imagined the vehicles in red alert being made of putty.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
GOLANX
GOLANX - - 236 comments

i liked the weakspots they did in Star Wars battlefront 2 they were usually in hard locations often making them trickshots and hard for other vehicles to exploit, gave a good fighter with a missile a chance though

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account: