Post news Report RSS An Open Window: PLD +30

After a month of developing, it's time to reveal more information about the MOD. Time to get philosophical and dive into deep matter, such as the concept of reality and quantum mechanics.

Posted by on

An Open Window: Project Launch Day +30

Today it's exactly a month ago I started this project. So far I've been able to give you some development news every few days, despite a few minor setbacks. However, I yet have to reveal a bit more information about the MOD itself.

The idea behind the MOD came to me when I was watching a documentary on quantum physics theory. While I'm not a science person, the philosophical aspect of the theory intrigued me. Quantum mechanics cannot be described in a few sentences but a part of it came down to the concept of reality. Scientists have proven that the presence or the actions of humans can alter, or better, define reality in the very essence of all matter in the universe, down the level of particles. This makes reality relative and unique to each individual interacting with it and the same applies to the concept of time. In quantum mechanics, the future affects the present just as much as the past.

While a lot of this seems strange or highly unconventional, there must be ways to somehow display this in a game. However, forget about time machines or strange futuristic devices you see in other games. I'm attempting to put some of these theories into a realistic scenario. A place where full reality is happening, but the player decides which part of that reality becomes his own and what is the present, future or the past.

The trouble with making such a thing is the sheer amount of possibilities. Even in 100 years, humans won't be able to make a computer or a game which can handle full reality. There will always be factors you cannot predict and even though you would like to give the player freedom, you will always need to limit their possibilities. Looking at it that way, this might also be the reason why people flee from reality by playing games. The obvious reason would be that people want to be that superhero they can't be in reality but the game also gives them a confined and underwhelming reality, which is far easier to grasp and has clear rules and goals. This is what psychology calls the burden of choice.

With that I'd like to conclude today's update, before it's turning into a psychological wall of text. The framework has been laid out and in the next article I will expand on the role of the player and the mechanics behind the MOD. As this article, the Question of the Day requires some thought and I eagerly await your comments on this one. Thanks for reading!

Question of the Day:
Do you think the reality of games is more attractive than the actual reality?

Post comment Comments
Goldendeed
Goldendeed - - 263 comments

I think.... my brain hurts.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Hackadoll2号
Hackadoll2号 - - 158 comments

this question can depend on the person's view of their reality.
In my reality, games are less attractive simply because your choices will always be in some way limited. Reality provides freedom to do virtually (no pun intended) anything.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
macacos2
macacos2 - - 525 comments

You mean games that try to simulate our reality, or a reality of their own?
I kind of like the majority of realities in videogames ( Mainly Fiction ) most of the time when they're not about routine-and-repeat like our world is like ( for now ).

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
DarkPivot
DarkPivot - - 699 comments

You seem to have an idea for a very original mod. I'm now much more excited to see what will come out of this.

To answer your question:
It all depends on what's going on in my actual reality. Video games can be nice to remove yourself from reality, but only temporarily. Maybe if I'm having some trouble in life, I can always escape momentarily in a different world, even though its existence is fictional.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
BillyJBarter
BillyJBarter - - 8 comments

I depends what game I am playing, when playing an 'open' game I often get more frustrated at its limitations, where as when playing something liniar I just accept its limitations and enjoy the game.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Otter.
Otter. - - 1,355 comments

I agree with your comment mostly.
But for me it also depends on how creative I feel.
If I'm in my creative mood the imaginary/virtual world fascinates me more then the real world like creating little world of my own on paper or computer.
But if I'm looking for inspiration or don't feel like creating anything the real world is more interesting.
Man, I can waste like hours in Google Earth for a quick example. Looking all the little islands in the ocean, imagining who lives there in what kind of environment.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
HmTervapuro
HmTervapuro - - 532 comments

Reality´s way more attractive and rewarding, for sure.

If I drink a cup of coffee in real life, I sit down, sip at it for half an hour, linger, look around, talk random stuff, calm down, and thats the best there is. If I sip a cup of coffee in a game, I lose a gem or something, my character does some animation, and then I go kill some rats for more money.

Silly example, but that would go for anything really-- Swimming, driving, fights, scares, laughs, sex, work, training. Games are, ultimately, emotionally quite cold. Escapism can be impressive, but yeh..

I get more out of reading people´s faces in morning bus rides than out of killing an epic dragon in a rpg.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
xXMaNiAcXx
xXMaNiAcXx - - 4,807 comments

Yes.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+1 vote
Alvar_Hanso
Alvar_Hanso - - 36 comments

Hm. I like games, but I don't think there's any substitute for something like a mountain range or outer space. Scale is the important part, I think. The implications of scale. For instance: Blogs.discovery.com

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account: