This member has provided no bio about themself...
I can see every tire out there.
I like this open area,the skybox with those mountains fits just perfectly.
Looking good,very good.
Is it the lighthouse?
So you removed some stuff from this place i see.
Looking good,but i just dont like the sprites on those bushes,the distance should be set higher.
Where are your weapons?
Looking good,just needs some props.
Like i said,it's just a shorter loadingbar texture.
Its just an illusion,a texture made in Photoshop.
If you would copy the default FC loadingbar it would go all the way to the end,just like in Far Cry.
Latest version of it is even better.
Yes that one is totally different from Far Crys & most other games.
It was inspired a little by Doom 3.
So No.1 you say.
No.1 has now a % in the loadingbox,before it was empty & also the Loading text is moved to the left,beginning of the loadbox.
I like No. 1 & 2,what do you guys think?
I am working on a few different versions,will post them once they are done so we can choose the best one.
A few weeks ago my HDD died on me & lots of game files were damaged,some even totally.
I managed to save the most & the rest i added from a old backup i had,the rest ill redo,but the most important thing is that the game is not dead.
So i changed the loadscreen a little,looks better now.
Not too sure about the color of the level name,should i change it & to what?
OPCL/DEVKID at "Very High" (Textures set to High & Bumpmaps to off) results with 34 fps!!!
Not possible to test at "ULTRA"!!!
ET at "ULTRA" results with 66 fps!!!
Both OPCL/DEVKID & ET use almost the same % of CPU(33% for OPCL vs 38% for ET)but ET uses up to 99% of GPU while OPCL uses only 50%.
Vram usage of OPCL is also lower than for ET(OPCL 472MB vs ET 900MB),this is all by testing both OPCL & ET at start of the level.
Cant say if OPCL will use above 512MB of Vram further in the level,but ET surely will use up to 1.2GB or more.
Scaler set to aggressive!!!
"Medium" - 37 fps
"Very High" - 33 fps
Its worse then with Scaler set to off.
Setting my cpu speed to 3.91GHz gave me 2-3 fps more,not worth it.
-Distance scaler off!!!
Looking to the river/city i get 42 fps
Looking to the river/city i get 34 fps
So you have 85 fps on your Windows 7 machine & i got 166 fps on mine.
Its 20 fps better then on your XP machine.
My cpu can go up to 3.91GHz
I use Windows 7 for modding,not Windows 10,due to 3ds max not working on Windows 10,but both Far Cry & ET are running fine.
On memleak map i have more fps then you,above 100 i think,will test again later.
My PC is old too,i have only a new gfx card,the rest is a few years old.
Q9550 @ 3.4 GHz
8GB DDR2 Memory
R9 380 4GB Gpu
Nice,but it needs more props added.
Textures look great.
Good work there.
Hell yeah,this looks so so good.
I am finally happy with it.
Replaced the old textures with the new high res ones & this is the result.
You don't pay attention to cpu usage in far cry,that's fine but has nothing to do with ET since its not far cry,it's a cryengine 1 game.
The first % is the gpu usage & the second is fan rpm & it's set to 50%.
Did you notice in the top left corner the cpu/gpu/ram usage?
It uses 2,98GB of memory,2 cpu cores & 873MB vram & thats just a screenshot taken at 25% of the level.
The final amount of vram used will be around 2GB i think.
Good that i have a gpu card with 4GB of vram.