Comments - Inferussian

The model is really bad. Author of the model has seen T-90 only once and in videogame for sure.

Write here because because I'm interested in mod, and I want to convey my thoughts to the developers!

What guys are very good!
But Rhino and Sledgehammer require a redesign.
Soviet tanks from RA3 have pronounced features of futurism of the 50-60s.
Your models do not match this.
I believe that Rhino should be made on the basis of the T-54 or IS-7, with characteristic inclined shapes and a rounded tower.
The tank destroyer looks directly like Object 268, which is not good. I’ll also pay attention to it, the tracks are open, on the original tanks from RA3 all the chassis do not have fenders.
The Soviet heavy tank, the last in the video, generally a copy of the Overlord from the Generals. And for some reason, he has an exhaust manifold for exhaust gases on the tower, which is very strange.
Excellent processing of the Apocalypse, now it looks better than a toy for a 3-year-old child. Without sarcasm.
Excellent smoke effect at start! Like a real diesel engine)))
If, suddenly, you are interested, I could offer options for how I see these tanks, with these abilities, but with a different appearance)

Проще говоря, я б хотел увидеть в игре Армату просто. Вот такой вот фетиш.

А если сделать одну из, так сказать, генеральских специализаций (прости, не знаю, как правильно называется) вроде "проекта Армата"
То бишь, там будут всякие Арматы - Т-14, 15, 16, БРЭМ. К примеру в "Браун Бере" угадываются черты корпуса Арматы. Можно сказать, это будут передовые танковые части?
Так, например, основной танк - Т-14, вместо БМП-3 можно взять Т-15 или Курганца. Из артиллерии - тоже на базе арматы. При этом, конечно, они будут дороже. Или так: вместо ИСа-7, или Голема, можно воткнуть Армату, а в качестве ОБТ, вместо Рино и Кадьяка - Бурлак, Т-90 с необитаемой башней. Возможно, стоит оставить одну из моделей Кадьяка, только чуть-чуть её переделать, фич каких-либо добавить, вроде того же КАЗа.
Взамен же превосходства танков, можно было бы урезать пехоту или авиацию. Например, вообще шокового солдата исключить, как и всякие тесла-технологии. Уж прости, если идеями тебя и так задалбывают, спасибо за этот превосходный аддон!
Бурлак: Yaplakal.com

General of Nyash-Myash

Давайте посмеёмся над этой несмешной шуткой.

Как всегда, ничего нового, русские плохие, злые. Ещё они медведи. Отлично. Слабо сделать игру, где агрессором выступит Европейский союз или США?

It's "AK-74S" with folding stock

Штурмовая винтовка - это автомат, как и ПП. Тогда автомат будет переводится и как ШВ, и как ПП. Ну?

Будет ли КАЗ "Арена" или "Афганит"?

How is it possible something ?! SpetsNaz never uses AKS-74U, or at least only with a silencer. For him, created compact machine SR-3 and SR-2. There is a variant of A-91 or 9A-91.

Не,АКС-74У это же не ПП(SMG, а простой малогабаритный автомат, ты что!

А как же НУРС?

Очень прикольно получается,не то что ROTR

Question to all: if the tank on Abrams like?

Twinblade is returne

The absence of any modification of APC in Russia I was somewhat surprised

Показан перевод для запроса Мне кажется,что моё мнение имеет место быть.
Искать вместо этого перевод для Мне кажется,что моё мнение имеет место жить.
I think my opinion is the place to be.

It seems to me that the All too cumbersome and is not suitable for the role of the Russian forces, which are almost always choose the speed gun or armor (such a policy in armor was founded in the twenties of the twentieth century) in this regard, it can replace pereemnik - more nimble Armata. It has a standard anti-aircraft machine gun (anti-aircraft and infantry) and "Arena". T-64-to-year war (2035 I think) is already heavily outdated, it would be necessary to replace not just "bling" such as active armor and replace other tanks: T-72, T-80, T-90. The action takes place in the future, here and give future - the C-400. And also, perhaps, it would be necessary to replace the badly outdated, to the Mi-24 time of the fighting in the more modern Mi-35. Perhaps you are interested in anti-tank helicopter Ka-52 helicopter and invisible Ka-58 "Black Ghost"

Can I ask? Where Armata, T-90, T-80, S-400 Triumph and BTR-90?

The only thing that happened in the modification of the authors, it is the appearance excluding special effects (explosions, shadows, etc.). That is, the equipment and buildings, as well as soldiers. They are made so clearly and correctly, it seems that they use the original texturing

More, not developed the animation of many buildings

I have the feeling that the modification of the author does not know the original Generals 2. Even banal cursors of the second part is not. But such a simple little modification already exists. Really hard to realize the vision of an open roof in construction building, without scaffolding. Well, actually themselves scaffolding are not like their counterparts in the original. And the original, or at least partially, the original voice of units? You can simply record sound from vidio on Generals 2 and select the desired areas, where it is said (responding, listen, I do not know how to say) unit. It is necessary to add a second crane in some construction. Probably also possible to do so, that would put a roof crane in the final stages of construction. as well as to scaffolding fell away, and not just going down, as in the first part. Even interface could not be positioned as it is necessary, whatever the button "to fight" is at the top, and add images, as in the second part.

На русском.Да.

whether it is possible to make the crane hoisted on the roof of the building, like the original Generals 2?

Did you see the menu in this Generals 2 ?!