It should be spent in the stabalizatiin of their economy and after that the improvement of their young's education followed by the entertainment of the populace.
A happy nation is a healthy nation.
Though keeping a good military is wise too. Instead of quantity ut should be quality, there are countless examples were a well-armed military took on a larger military.
The price of just one Tomahawk missile is enough to feed nearly 300 people for 5 years. If the US government directed 25% of their yearly military spending towards humanitarian and civil work, they could feed Africa for well over a decade.
That's also because their those are private companies developing and manufacturing american weapons. If those were state's factories, it would be much cheaper I think.
It should be spent in the stabalizatiin of their economy and after that the improvement of their young's education followed by the entertainment of the populace.
A happy nation is a healthy nation.
Though keeping a good military is wise too. Instead of quantity ut should be quality, there are countless examples were a well-armed military took on a larger military.
The US has arguably a quantative military.
Ironic since now Russia is turning for a small, yet very will equipped army.
In all honesty USA in now virtually becoming another USSR. Promoting and/or enforcing "Democracy" everywhere.
How cruel fate can be lol.
The graph speaks for its self. The US has a monopoly in military power; the most useless thing to have a monopoly over in the 21st century.
The price of just one Tomahawk missile is enough to feed nearly 300 people for 5 years. If the US government directed 25% of their yearly military spending towards humanitarian and civil work, they could feed Africa for well over a decade.
That's also because their those are private companies developing and manufacturing american weapons. If those were state's factories, it would be much cheaper I think.
hmm The state of the city of Hiroshima vs the city of Detroit.