Last updated: 05/11/2011
--------------------------------------------------------------
Q: This mod must be so bad you have to add sexuality to it just to make it interesting.
A: No, but clones are normally naked. Babies are naked too.
Q: How you will add Weapons to Portal? The Source Code is not Open.
A: We will whipe up a completly new code if we cant get the original one.
Q: Will the final version contain any Left 4 Dead or CSS Content?
A: The final version will use: Some CSS Content, L4D Content is not decided yet.
Q: Can i have your < Content name here > ?
A: I gues you are not serious, are you?
Q: It's not fun to shoot through a portal and kill zombies, which can't see you!
A: The mod will have its own AI for path finding for the NPCs. Please note we will not have Zombies.
Q: When does the mod come out?
A: UPDATED: It comes out when its done, and definatly before 2015.
Q: Do you will change to Portal 2?
A: We will see. We have to look which game supports our concept better.
UPDATE: Currently it looks like Portal 1 has the better Mod support so it looks like we will still use Portal 1.
If A.M.M.D. see any of this Questions in the comments again he will bang his head against the next wall.
"this Clones are born in his Vats and dont left them." Are you freaking serious, that has more grammar fails than I can count, but cool answers all the same.
awesome.
That release date isn't serious is it?
Also, seems like no one can accept me using a bit of CSS and L4D props. x3
Well considering if your not requiring people to own those games to play this mod your essentially stealing content from valve and giving it to people for free
I actually meant: It seems no one can accept me using L4D and CSS props as place holders.
So I will need L4D2 to play this mod?
No, L4D is not needed.
And this FAQ currently isnt correct, but a corrected version will be up asap.
FAQ Updated.
NOT CSS!!!! CSS is Cascading Style Sheets!! LOOK MORE IN GOOGLE AND WIKIPEDIA!!
CS:S - Counter-Strike:SOURCE
CSS - Cascading Style Sheets
Guy, your arguments are invalid.
oh yeah? well all your bases are belongs to us...and he's right. css is cascading style sheets, and cs:s is counterstrike source. use teh punctuationz
and wow...2015. hope this mod's good enough for the wait...I mean, it looks pretty good, but 2015...you're not pulling a black mesa are you? lol
The punctation In CS:S is not an official variant and you cant say css is just for cascading stylesheets.
...karma down?? for what??? FOR THE THINGS THAT YOU DONT KNOW?????
Example: write in Google (www.google.com) "CSS" or "CS:S", and you will see the difference...
Guy, Google tags short forms for popularity, but CS:S is not any official short form of Counter-Strike Source, and now stop complaining about such a stupid non-fact.
Ok, now it would be Counter-Strike Source(now source part of name of the game, and it doesnt show that it is a eugine of game...)
blah, stupid war =(
ok, from now! lets stop it!!!
for you:
CSS - Counter-Strike Source
for me:
CS:S - Counter-Strike: SOURCE
CSS - Cascading Style Sheets
i can see your argument, but it's a hl2 mod, why would you even think about cascading style sheets?
CSS is counter strike source for lazy people.
I <3 css
lol
i'm very lazy...
before 2015.. lol :D , nice date for waiting :D
we will look forward!
Hope we get a better release date!
The problem is the code!
Thats not the actual release date, its just the latest termin for release.
@Kizzycocoa
Are you kinda trying to troll us?
In our hole game there is no single child, so please, leave right now.
If you make such a attemp on breaking AMMD's rights again, we need to sue you.
Your unqualified comment was deleted.
(He mentioned something about child pornography guys)
I was merely saying, to say babies are naked is not a good reason. in fact, it is bordering on him saying that it is acceptable to see babies naked in mods, and to kill said babies.
just saying, it's a VERY bad example :S
and I'm not trolling. I am merely saying that to say that is the equivilent of saying that it's ok to see babies naked.
sorry. small grammar problem there.
I meant:
"and I'm not trolling. I am merely saying that, to say that naked clones is ok because babies are naked at birth, is like saying that it's ok to see babies naked."
That actually isnt funny and a direct conflicgt with the german (And I gues most other countries) law to say such things about other things.
Like Ive told you before, If you do such a thing again, you will hear from our lawyer.
wtf? it is illegal to SHOW it. not to SAY it. you need to learn about law.
I am just saying, to use that argument is silly. I'm sorry if you can't see it from where I stand, but to say babies are born naked isn't a reason. it's biology.
we're born naked too. but we dare not stay naked in public. why? it's indecent.
you could use the argument they're created naked. fine. people will still argue, but that's fine.
but you shouldn't give babies being naked as a reason. it's illogical to give an illegal example to make your decision right :S
You said he likes childporn, that what breaks the law.
You cant just tell stupid lies about others.
Learn law.
From now on you will be ignored by our team (As long as you do not hit us again)
I said it sounded like he was ACCEPTING
accepting doesn't mean like.
also, I think you'll find that all my input thus far has not been trolly. and tbh. I don't care. I want to help. whether you accept it or not is your decision. I'll be glad to see the mod tear itself apart a bit. however, I am not the cause of it at all. you are. and I don't cling to petty disputes, so I don't troll.
also, have to add, this is a WEBSITE.
people could come in and say ANYTHING. post ANYTHING. link to ANYTHING.
it was too obvious, I couldn't not say how bad the argument is.
and FYI, you can't sue someone over what they say you like, even though I said he was accepting. 2 different meanings alltogether.
I could accuse anyone a number of things and not one of them would be sueable. however, that would be "trolling". and I'd be banned from moddb. non-the-less, the comment was meant to be a joke. you could tell by the way it was written. and you went and blew it out of proportion to make it a warped accusation.
and I'll be damned if people think I'd accuse and insult someone like a lowlife troll. I have never maliciously insulted or abuse anyone. and never will.
and for the record, the comment was before AMMD told me he didn't karma-abuse all the pages. so if it were after that, I'd have said P:C. not AMMD.
oh, delete my comments about how I said ACCEPTING?
seriously. learn2comment.
I said accepting.
and ONCE AGAIN, for the record, I would have not said AMMD if I had known he had not trolled my page.
it was a joke. it was staring me in the face how bad the argument was, and I showed you. then you turned it into this malicious comment.
also, FYI, I -could- say anything. I could say things WAY worse than something as petty as that. even I have a cynical side to me too. but I don't use it. what that was was jokey. if I wanted to insult you, I'd be permanently banned for sure.
congrats btw. first person to threaten me with a lawsuit.
and either delete the whole convo, or leave this comment alone. I have it saved on here, and I will repost if you try to make it look like I'm being malicious again.
now undeleting it? this page is starting to look like a massive one-sided argument x.x
just saying, I do try to help. despite how much you think "he's trolling!!!1!", I am just trying to help. this whole thing could have been diverted if you just saw using babies is wrong for an example.
I am not saying I don't accept the fact you're using naked people. it's not my business to decide that for you. I was trying to be helpful by showing how the argument in your FAQ could be taken in a undesirable way. it's the first thing I thought when reading it. all you have to put is "they're born naked", and that would suffice. I just wanted to help you see that bringing babies into the midst would stur it up more.
I did not undelete it, that must have happened when the ModDB team reviewed this.
They should have contacted you.
ah, yeah. I don't think we can talk about that though :S
well, seems this is all over now.
feel free to delete this if it clutters up the page.
but please consider changing it. the first thing that I thought when reading that was about acceptance of CP. and I very much doubt any one of you like that at all. I just wanted to help by pointing it out.
regardless, delete it if you wish.
Why the hell are you commenting so much when he's ignoring you? You filling the whole freakin' page!
old reply is old
idk why this is even still here. I'd thought that it would be deleted.
Arguing on the internet is like the special Olympics.
hell yeah, there should be a FWOTY award on moddb.
1st place, portal combat vs kizzycocoa flame war.
then we get to flame each other about who gets the money after.
By the time this is done portal 3 episode 2 will have come out.