Comments - keen125

Did I just buy Crysis instead of Crysis: Warhead? Which game is this for?

Is it the whole single player campaign, or just a few missions?

Would you be interested in making a WWI mod?

That would be an amazing achievement!! I believe it can be done

Just wanted to say that you are right about the Spartans not using the Macedonian phalanx with 20 ft spears. They did have a phalanx of their own, but used it offensively. If you've read the book "Gates of Fire," the Spartans would sprint at the enemy formation with their shields overlapping each other and the 8 or so ranks behind the front line pushing their shields into their backs. Allowing the distribution of shock and would knock the enemy off their feet, break their spears, and leave them dazed and winded.

Ah, that's fine. I'd say that size of a map would only be helpful for medium range engagement and testing characteristics of infantry in a firefight. Basic infantry will react differently to special forces units. Regular infantry units may do spins around corners adn put their backs against walls, but more well trained soldiers will always be aiming at the side of a corner, the opposite direction of the street, or at rooftops and windows that will expose their squad. If you've played Full Spectrum Warrior, that's exactly how infantry will preform most effectively in combat.

I have some ideas. Most of which are 1st/3rd person shooters, but if I could, I would include an RTS role such as a command or asset role. I don't think this game is capable of supporting what I would like to do, but I was surprised about how much you could do that I was not aware of. There are a lot of variables in combat that I can say what needs to be changed about the characteristics of infantry (armor is very good in MoW), and I'm not really sure if they are worth mentioning this early. One of the best changes this game could have would be for the M16/M4 to shoot at an effective range of 550m, and implementing realistic LOS (Line of sight); the vision of each individual person on the battle field, blind spots behind buildings, optics improving LOS, ect.

Also, I think the models of humans in this game are very cartoonish. It would be a lot more appealing to people if you created your own, or bought a different one. Arma II has the best skins I have ever seen. The actual game itself is a failure because of how real they tried to make it, which is sad because it goes to show how hard it is. I'm not saying don't make it realistic, but I do think they gave up on it too soon.

Pretty much everything I have described you can find in Black Hawk Down. If you've watched enough history channels or played enough games to know a bit more than the average person, you might just know as much as I do. I'm just dying to make a game. I'm not too good with actually writing script, or understanding the way programming works, but these games are missing something and I know what they need. Who knows, maybe some day.

Do you have Xfire or steam? My xifre is keen125 and steam is keen1257

I personally believe that health should consist of three icons; Moderate, high, and critical (Yellow, orange, red). By increasing the accuracy and range of all weapons, you can slowly make this more realistic. Go onto wikipidia and look up each individual weapon and try to recreate the properties of these weapons as close as you can in MoW. The reason why not as many Americans died in the actual war wasn't because they had more "health," because obviously, that doesn't exist. Somalians were not trained at all, and were using old Russian AK-47s and AKS-74s which are good at close range, but inaccurate at medium to far range and in the hands on untrained militia, it was very one sided. All American soldiers are trained and use a very accurate 5.56 round with the M16 and M4 (mostly used by Special forces.) The only Americans who died were due to bad planning and chance.

So, if you still want health after knowing all of that, then I guess I did my best to convince you other wise.

Hello,
I am a senior developer in the mod, Modern Warfare of World in Conflict. I can give you quite a few pointers if you are interested in improving your mod. They might seem a bit harsh, but I mean none of it personally.

The map is too small. I'm not sure if you have a slow computer and aren't able to run the mod on a bigger map, or if the polygons on the units are too great. By increasing the map size, you then have the ability to put more realistic particle effects of the bullets, ie. ricochets, max-min effective range for small arms all the way up to artillery, a better picture of the way the units look, move, and react in combat scenarios.

Doctrines: Little birds do not hover around a battle field the same way Black Hawks did in Somalia. Even though, Black hawks pilots should not sanely fly low around buildings since they are attracting RPGs, which are other wise, very inaccurate. Little birds are used for fast insertion of a four man special forces unit and flight security with an armament of their gatling guns and rockets. They can support troops on the ground, but they are present on the battlefield only when requested as fire support from the ground troops.

I'll leave it there for now, and see how you respond.

Looks great, but why fps?

Hey Jose. I was wondering if you would like to use one of the sound tracks I just completed to publicize your map la Campana.

Moddb.com

We should make a black Texture

Online is the only way to go xD

Good day fellow followers