Comments - Modpappa

Jesus do you mean:
"Couldn't you all just stop-" or "Could you all just stop-"

To answer the latter, I wouldn't stop until pointless useless mods like this stop.

Well I didn't really say anything about the war.
But I do know history, if that's what you're questioning.

Sweden succeeded in a policy of "neutrality" while providing valuable intelligence to the Allies, But continued the trade of iron with Germany. While Denmark and Norway were occupied by Germany because of important strategic value.

They both fought in the war in their own ways, Sweden allowed volunteers to cross over and defend Finlands independence from the USSR, and Denmark fought Germany when it started operation Weserübung suffering losses of 16 dead and 20 wounded until surrender.

Although the invasion of Denmark lasted less than six hours and was the shortest military campaign conducted by the Germans during the war most of the fighting and casualties occurred during the occupation of Denmark.

So I do know that Denmark was occupied and had fought in the war.

Stop being such an imprudent fool macksehhy.

I recall it's missing two people by books and/or manuals, but there is not ever quite a time that everything in war is right by the books.

Yet surprisingly the other one of them could be the most important gentleman in a squad, as I don't see anyone holding a machine-gun the machine-gunner must be missing or void.

It's historically correct by a lack of numbers part, but the machine-gunners yielded the most firepower in a squad and so would be most important.

But this not a valid argument as it's not a typical unit, as I see that the user interface says that it's a "volkslandsergruppe" or a people's soldier group.

It's good.

I firmly disagree with you. Additionally, I suspect your sincerity knowing you from before about defending crap on a different mod.

I Agree.

Uh, here, I'll translate it to Scandinavian.
Slaget om kvicksilver floden?
If that wasn't amusing this is always hilarious.
Too bad less people know about denmark's prejudice of swedes.

What if people wouldn't and what would that even prove?

If I make a program with lots of errors I'd be seen as a crappy programmer even if the end user wouldn't know anything about programming languages.

He himself was a little childish whiner and supposedly 20 years old too.
I do not like they comment burying thing though as it won't let people see what he said.

The Battle of Mercury river?

This doesn't look finished, did your mapmaker say to publish these pics?

if

Hey Jesus, Why do you ask people to show their own better mods? What if they wouldn't? What does that prove?

Latest news are in, Swiss medics have arrived on the pacific front.

Who cares if someone made a better mod? You? Damn, I HAVE made a better mod than this so take that.

But also, take a look at PACIFIC THUNDER, a good mod which has the same idea this has but will be much better than this mod will ever be.

Stop telling people to shut the **** up like you have any authority or respect, that's what stupid teens do when they've yet to grow up.

Haha! Moomin are obese because they don't have those holes.
But this isn't a place to talk about lube and rape Macksehhy, please take it elsewhere.

My dog made a map last week, he's going to sue Jalle for copyrights.

There are stormtroopers and the Afrika korps representing the japanese? why?

I wonder what's so hopeless about a Finnish StuG.

Did you make this yourself Jalle? If you didn't, atleast mention who actually DID!!

It's true that Stalin used penal units and others for all kinds of gruesome things if just to slaughter those who would oppose him. But these were not proper and worthy military units, what I want to know is why do you believe that red army soldiers had to make do without weapons deliberately in the frontlines?

What do you mean with "these are just conscripts" and "it's also in EF"?
It IS in EF but that doesn't mean it's true to history or right by everyones opinion as many have pointed out at their forums that it shows neither sense or truth.

Rare occurences are rare and movies are mostly more wrong than true when it comes to depicting history, so would you tell me when were soldiers across the front sent into combat unarmed?

Why is numerical superiority represented as bigger squads? It doesn't make sense as the reason why the germans had less riflemen in their squads was because they wanted to have more operational units to be useful in outmaneuvering the enemy instead of bigger units.

That's what the red army also thought but they having more trained manpower available meant that they could make the same kind of squads the americans and the british could but still maintain a surplus amount of units for assault, manuevering and reserves.

That's not true, it would be far too easy to pick up a gun in the first logistics depot or the battlefield or like that. The real problem as most people should know is actually getting the stuff that is used such as ammunition because it's possible that an enemy with air superiority will choose to bomb your supplies and logistics.

Jalle, you should delete this as no one likes you spamming the moddb.

And regarding the soviet command:
What is the soviet doctrine to war, massed operational units or what?

sorry about double post.

Is there a good explanation for why the soviets are able to supply and train all their riflemen for a kalash?

I believe that even though the AK's were known for their and reliability and ease of maintenance (not for their ease of production until the AKM) they couldn't be able to train every rifleman with an assault rifle in the middle of a war.

Not sure how much your timeline in the mod differs though but could someone tell more about the morale and the officer corps of the red army in your 1949 timeline?

Though they didn't quite steamroll over the germans at 1945 now maybe you should give them conscripts a break from this "bad morale" and "poor officer corps" thing, wasn't this an issue only back in the start of barbarossa?

+1 lol!

stupid...