Imagine accusing a Wolfenstein game of 'historical revisionism' for removing a few photos of irl holocaust victims.
These people realise that Hitler didn't actually die in a mechsuit, right?
Imagine accusing a Wolfenstein game of 'historical revisionism' for removing a few photos of irl holocaust victims.
These people realise that Hitler didn't actually die in a mechsuit, right?
(buried)
If freedom of expression is the only thing that matters, then why do you have an issue with the developers wanting to keep their fantasy entertainment version of WW2 separate from the horrific reality?
Yeah im not going to lose sleep over your opinion, it's clear from your comments how immature and uneducated you are despite calling others illiterate.
Blade of Agony wasn't scrubbed of swastikas or references to Nazism, though: the few things that the devs removed have no business being in a pulpy fantasy version of WW2. Even in TNO, the sudden trip to a concentration camp felt out of place and completely unearned given how tongue-in-cheek the game had been up to that point.
Incredible game - I can't believe this is free! The passion that the devs have for the project is clear from the detail and variety in each map as well as the pleasing feedback of each weapon. I haven't done enough playthroughs yet to know the differences between the difficulties but gunning through the Hard equivalent was an absolute blast: it felt like there was just the right amount of health and ammo in each level, and the right level of aggression from the enemies, to make every encounter tense without feeling unfair.
I was a little hesitant after seeing negative feedback, because I suspected that - like RtCW and the new Wolfensteins - "censorship according to German law" meant that ALL references to Nazism, Hitler, swastikas, etc had been removed. This is absolutely not the case.
In summary: GET PSYCHED!
jcstudies6962
James joined
This member has provided no bio about themself...