A place to discuss rationality (Bayesian or otherwise), science and the scientific method, debunking superstituion, conspiricies, and urban legends, and generally just get away from a world where you're the only one whose learned how not to be crazy. Anyone interested in learning more about rationality, this is the place to ask.

Add media Report RSS Accuracy and precision (view original)
Accuracy and precision
embed
share
view previous next
Share Image
Share on Facebook Post Email a friend
Embed Image
Post comment Comments
BluishGreenPro
BluishGreenPro - - 534 comments

I remember this being mentioned at the start of my Grade 10 Science class. For example, if you shot at a target and hit in a cluster around the outer ring, it would still be considered "accurate", just not precise. Precision would be proximity to the center of the target.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+3 votes
CommanderDG
CommanderDG - - 1,389 comments

haha! We had this discussion about a year agowith my friends, about if the accuracy of the mesurement of the precision of the mesuremant was the most important. Personnaly I think the accuracy is what really matters but again this is debatable because science is made on reproductible result.

Reply Good karma Bad karma+2 votes
Post a comment

Your comment will be anonymous unless you join the community. Or sign in with your social account:

Description

"Accuracy indicates proximity of measurement results to the true value, precision to the repeatability or reproducibility of the measurement."