Conservatives of ModDB
Entertainment & Press
We are a group of Right-Wing advocates of freedom and individual liberty, the right to life, right to own and carry firearms, freespeech, net neutrality, individual rights, constitutional republic government, separation of church and state, limited government, anti-globalist, freedom of association, property rights, the free market, mandating transparency, preservation of western culture, Christianity and the European people against feminism, Islam, marxism and political correctness. For those on Mod DB if you're a conservative, libertarian, traditionalist, reactionary, Christian, Orthodox, nationalist or New Right, for US, Australia, New Zealand, Canada or European nations join us to help defeat progressives.
"There are only two mistakes one can ever make on the Path to truth: not starting; and not going all the way." ~Buddha
"The first step toward finding God, Who is Truth, is to discover the Truth about myself: and if I have been in error, this first step to Truth is the discovery of my error." ~Thomas Merton
Great movie
not a biased movie at all...
Also I hate liberals, but the links you are trying to make here between them and European fascist are outstanding... Even the idea of well-fair state that drives to fascism is simply ludicrous. In 4 years, you, The Unbeholden, did not learn one single thing. You are still what you are, an agent of Nationalism and a puppet of your master's.
Why are you so afraid of social-democracy? If you really believe that the USA are going to turn into a soviet dystopia you are no better than the sheep you claim to be above of. Can't you see by now that awoke means blindness? Your enemy is not democracy, but still, you have chosen to go that path, despite these 4 years! I am profoundly shocked!
The enemy is pure democracies and social democracies, as that is the path towards being a "do gooder" that always costs somebody else as opposed to the centralized power when making the decision, the common nationalist suggestion is that we need "skin in the game" so that we side with the common good and aren't exploiting the people. The ideas of the "central banking", "the welfare state", "neo-colonialism", "monopolies created by state and big business", "Modern Monetary Theory", "fiat currency" and "centralization of coordination over the economy".
Some debates that highlight the differences between the two sides:
Dr Richard D Wolff Vs Dr David D Friedman | Socialism Vs Capitalism Debate | Podcast - Youtube.com
DEBATE! Capitalism Vs Socialism: Ben Burgis vs. JF Gariepy (Replay from Modern-Day Debate) - Youtube.com
Marx and Proudhon defined socialism in a different way then how Richard Wolff does now. Basically pro heavier regulations, welfare states (state intervening to provide social welfare safety net is to make people dependent on the state) and interference in the markets about what to create, for whom, when and where i.e. state rules, regulations and controls. And another kind of socialism according to Wolff is taking over and operate private enterprise. Wolff says the third kind is about transforming the workplace to be pro-democratic.
Social-democracy is bringing everybody down to the lowest common denominator, leveling the rich so that everybody gets to be somewhat poor. It doesn't matter to them to create real wealth i.e. wise investments, building up technocracy to put large amount of resources into technological improvements and cultural capital. Their strategy is to make everybody else to seem like exploiters, because we don't take into account natural coercion and save people from it. Its not our responsibility to save everybody from work, to give people the unearned, if we need to be protected nature's coercion then it trivializes coercion, and it forces governments to makes us all into mediocre poor slaves because then we aren't allowed the incentives to do well and prosper, and it means infinite needs will be catered to.
Needs when catered to carte blanche will eventually increase the needs in subsequent generations. Increasing the amount of people and therefore genes of those who are dependent on support. More and more babies are created that also become dependent on welfare. Infinite needs will require infinite resources making it a impossible system to maintain for very long.
New Liberalism is about making everybody else seem like inhuman monsters for not vouching for the "political and social equality" of people. There is no political voice allowed for tons of groups in the US liberal societies or liberal adjacent states. Modern liberalism is about the lambs voting about what to do with the wolves, i.e. the better off, the strong or the higher ups. Raising anything to the ground that doesn't conform to the dictates of the masses whims, opinions or assertions, i.e. voting for something using majority rule is merely mob rule, the mob voting to take away the resources and rights of those in the majority. But the average person is selfish. So the average person will vote for their self-preservation, status and economic incentives to reward merit. That creates populism within liberal states, which leads to ideologies being taken up by various movements, which then leads to counter-movements which are "figuratively" allowed to gain power under liberalism.
Techno-economic advancement and associated accumulation of cultural capital is the neo-reactionary take. And is the only path forward for prosperity, responsibility, property rights and personal advancement i.e. meritocracy. Neo-reactionaries will impose a fight against the lies of propaganda machines, and bringing economic and political freedom is by bringing political power to the truth. Classical liberalism is economic and political freedom, rationality, free market and laissez-faire economics, civil liberties, rule of law with individual autonomy, limited government, and the enlightenment values of free thinking, free speech, and free to take objective self-interested action and against initiating violence. Such a kind classical liberalism beats new liberalism and is whats actually consistent with most Western conservatives.